CruisinTiger said:
I have been following this thread daily for I am about to do a 4 wheel disk conversion. I have a 79 axle that I am swapping into my truck and I am going to use rear disk brackets with rotors and mote carlo calipers in the back. I have a link with the part numbers needed for the rear disk conv. My question is, why is everyone having different problems? Is it because everyone here has different "brands" of calipers, rotors etc. Is it because some are running a boosted master and others aren't? Is it because some are running mini truck or corvette masters? Trollhole has 4 wheel disk setup with no prop valve, the PO put in a mastercylinder/booster from a 94 TLC(I believe that is the year) and he has no problems. Could it be that everyone is tryin to adjust them on there own and it's a trial and error thing, where as if you took it to a mechanic he could adjust them in no time flat and you would be good to go? Could it be the type of brake line you are using if it expands or not(don't think this is the case)?
My feeling is it has to do with the Master cylinder whether it is boosted or non boosted. And the type of calipers you are using...monte carlo or mini truck.
Sorry for all the questions, just trying to sum up all that I have read here. Thanks for all the help in advance.
Chuck
For reference, I'm using:
1975 TLC 1" bore drum/drum master cylinder with residual valves removed.
1979 FJ40 booster
Front Brakes:
1979 FJ40 Land Cruiser Disk
4-piston TLC Calipers (1-small and 1-large piston on each side of each caliper)
Raybestos pads and vented rotors with no slots or holes
Rear Brakes:
Mid-70s Metric GM Intermediate floating Calipers with single 2.6" piston
Calipers are mounted in upper rear position (I don't think caliper position matters but throwing it out there)
Rotors are Mid 90's GM truck - don't know brand but they cost about $25 each
Raybestos Pads
I'm using a proportioning valve on rear brake line. Its attached to master cylinder rear output within about 8" of master cylinder. I think the brand is Stainless Steel. Its basically adjusted all the way, maybe 95% of its adjustment, to limit rear brake pressure.
I'm using OEM style rubber brake flex hoses and 1/8" steel hard brake lines. I have 3 flex hoses on front axle and 3 flex hoses on rear. FT and RR Center hoses are about 20" each, FT sides are about 7" each, RR sides are about 10" each. So total flex hose length for FT is about 34" and RR is
about 40".
I'm NOT using the factory proportioning valve.
Braking:
On a hard stop, the fj40 stops nice and straight and pretty fast but I can still lock up rear tires. This setup is much better than the factory disk/drum for panic stops. The disc drum setup would always lock up one or the other rear tire on a panic stop.
I think the proportioning could be better, but I'm ok with the way it is now.
Just thinking if perhaps using different stype pads or rotors front vs. rear might help with front vs. rear tire lockup but I'm not sure I want to go to the expense or the trial and error testing at this point in time.
I believe my cruiser is pretty heavy in the rear vs. front. I carry a lot of spare parts, tools, gear, etc out back as well as a family roll cage. Up front is a SBC with alumimum heads, intake, water pump and radiator so definitely lighter than those running F or 2F . It does have a winch up front. I'm running 37" MTRs on steel wheels.