Ok, good point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It's important to others who read this thread to know if he has any actual experience with this product. If he has run them or seen them in action then his opinions are valid. If he has not ever run them or ever seen them in action then they can draw their own conclusions about the validity of his comments.
It's important to others who read this thread to know if he has any actual experience with this product. If he has run them or seen them in action then his opinions are valid. If he has not ever run them or ever seen them in action then they can draw their own conclusions about the validity of his comments.
For your application the aftermarket UCA's offer ZERO benefit over OEM. OEM cost less, last a long time as you know and require ZERO maintenance.
Aftermarket UCA's offer almost ZERO benefit to a rock crawler style of wheeling.
I can see their use ONLY if somebody has some certain driving style where they need to fit a special shock that does not fit in the stock fashion.
UCA's can offer more benefits on certain other rigs...on the 100 they are mostly worthless.
Bringing this one back to life, guys. Thanks.
Time to replace the OEM UCAs on my '98 LX. 150k miles and the DS is starting to get some play in it. So, question is:
To those of you who have now been running aftermarket UCAs for a while now, was it worth it with regards to squeaking and maintenance? I really don't do much articulation-necessary driving on hard core trails. I do, however, plut a lot of miles on the truck, fully loaded, on back roads throughout the US and CA.
Need to get this done prior to a 6k miles trip to Guatemala coming up in Dec. The cost b/t OEM and aftermarket is more or less the same. I drive Christo's old pearl white LX, btw, with OME lift, Slee diff drop and resi shocks, and 315/70/17s.
Any thoughts on which way to go? You guys who have done the Carl's or Total Chaos, would you do it again or go with OEM?
Thanks for the help.
Wes
NOBODY who drives paved or regular-ole forest roads and/or moderate trails benefits from an aftermarket UCA on the HUNDRED SERIES. It's not rocket science and they will NEVER be installed onto my 100.
Go tell that to the N74L doubters like you're telling it to me about the UCA's.
NOBODY who drives paved or regular-ole forest roads and/or moderate trails benefits from an aftermarket UCA on the HUNDRED SERIES. It's not rocket science and they will NEVER be installed onto my 100.
Bringing this one back to life, guys. Thanks.
Time to replace the OEM UCAs on my '98 LX. 150k miles and the DS is starting to get some play in it. So, question is:
To those of you who have now been running aftermarket UCAs for a while now, was it worth it with regards to squeaking and maintenance? I really don't do much articulation-necessary driving on hard core trails. I do, however, plut a lot of miles on the truck, fully loaded, on back roads throughout the US and CA.
Need to get this done prior to a 6k miles trip to Guatemala coming up in Dec. The cost b/t OEM and aftermarket is more or less the same. I drive Christo's old pearl white LX, btw, with OME lift, Slee diff drop and resi shocks, and 315/70/17s.
Any thoughts on which way to go? You guys who have done the Carl's or Total Chaos, would you do it again or go with OEM?
Thanks for the help.
Wes
Comparing UCA's to exhaust. I rest my case.
This thread has nothing to do with the N74L.
Do you have any actual experience with this product, yes or no?
Can you answer this?
Ya...enough to know they are a dumb buy for 99% of the 100 owners. We're not talking Tacoma's and other vehicles. We're talking 100-series.
Is this the best objection you can come up with? Answer = Yes...because you cannot list a CREDIBLE list of benefits to the mod becuase there are none.
So will the Z06 kill my Rx8? Can you not answer because you don't drive BOTH? ANYBODY who would spend 5-minutes on-line could learn the true answer and they wouldn't have to go buy and drive both.
Yukon LX said:Can you answer this?
They are 100% uneccessary on 99.9% of the 100's out there on the road.
Reality is they provide almost ZERO improvements while they offer some negatives.
- Better alignment (easier to get tighter to spec).
Not better...100's running aftermarket lifts get alignments in spec every day.
- 1"+ increase in droop (You can be up higher and still get your minimum 2 inches of recommended droop).
Extra droop not required. Extra droop would be a plus IF it did not come at the cost of extreme CV angle...and the angle is already extreme as CV leakage is already an issue.
- Stronger (Cromo/DOM construction vs. stamped steel on OEM).
OK...true...though it's meaningless on a part that does not break in the first place. We're not talking axles from a Jeep. We're talking UCA's on a 100 and there have been ZERO breakages.
- More clearance for larger tires (this is especially true when airing down 35s).
OK...though again not needed whatsoever. IF the tire you're contenplating rubs then consider ANOTHER TIRE. Don't waste $1000 on arms so you can fit the ONE tire model you want. There's a boatload of 315's out there that fit without rubbing and without wheel spacers.
- More clearance for aftermarket shocks and their associated remote reservoir runs.
This is the ONE thing I said that merits the buy. But how many 100-owners NEED to run this ONE rare model shock? Under 1%?
Probably more, but this is off the top of my head. Every one of these points is FACT. If you can't prove me wrong on these points in three posts or less then you have to agree to stay off of this thread for 30 days...Agreed?