Malleus
Far west of Siegen
As long as you don't put two clutch plates back to back, it doesn't matter where you put the extra steel. It's just taking up the gap between the clutches and the piston/spring retainer.Thanks everyone. My new steel plates and clutches are from the Transtar kit. Since this pack consists of 7 steel plates and 7 clutches, a tiny thickness variation might easily explain why my gap came in a bit large. I still have all of them so I could make those measurements to check that. However, things are not quite so clear cut.
The FSM and various parts diagrams such as, EPCdata, are not always in agreement with each other or reality. This situation we are discussing here is a good example of that. On page AT-59 of the FSM, there is a nice drawing for this first & reverse brake pack. The problem is, the drawing does not match what was in my transmission. That drawing shows 8 plates and 7 discs/clutches in the Land Cruiser pack. Mine had 7 of each. I watched a decent video of an A343F rebuild and that transmission also had 7 of each. If you look at the EPCdata drawing, it shows 7 plates and 7 discs/clutches, which matches number-wise, but the order they show is not correct.
My Transtar kit had 7 plates and 7 discs/clutches, which agreed with what I removed, and so that is what I replaced in mine. But, when I discovered that the gap was a bit too much, I will add back 1 plate taken from my old plates. Doing that, I will get the gap right in the middle of where it should be. So, funny enough, when I am done, I will have 1 flange, 8 plates, and 7 discs/clutches, which matches the FSM...
The only remaining question is where to place it. My plan was to add that extra plate directly on top of the flange, creating a thicker flange. But oddly, the FSM shows that 8th plate going in at the top of the pack. In effect there are 2 plates back-to-back at the top. SO I will need to think about that.