94 vs 96 FZJ80 Engine Mount Difference?

[rcracin]

Does anyone know if the two part numbers are different?

12361-17011​

12361-66030

I have a set of 12361-66030 mounts and a 96 80.

 

[Broski]

The mounts should be the same

 

[cruiserdan]

They are NOT "the same".

They look the same but the compounds are different. The 17011 is also used for diesel engines. The later 1FZ also uses them. The difference probably has something to do with NVH. Do not mix them, replace only in matched pairs.

 

[Broski]

They are NOT "the same".

They look the same but the compounds are different. The 17011 is also used for diesel engines. The later 1FZ also uses them. The difference probably has something to do with NVH. Do not mix them, replace only in matched pairs.

Thank you for the correction !

 

[rcracin]

Thank you guys.

Both are the same so I’ll go ahead and use them.

 

[cruiserdan]

Thank you guys.

Both are the same so I’ll go ahead and use them.

It appears you missed a key point. They are NOT THE SAME!
It is essential that you use a matched pair of either variant.

 

[OGBeno]

@cruiserdan … for the millionth time in his life….

 

[Broski]

It appears you missed a key point. They are NOT THE SAME!
It is essential that you use a matched pair of either variant.

I think he meant that the two that he has are the same !

 

[Broski]

If you mix and match you well blow a head gasket

 

[rcracin]

Correct @Broski. The two mounts I have are the same part number so they are same compound and suitable to use.

Thanks @cruiserdan for being an excellent source of information.

 

[Kabanstva]

Which ones are recommended to buy?

Is the newer part number (ending in 17011) favored?

There had to be a reason Toyota updated the mounts? Maybe it’s a softer compound and better at reducing engine vibration? Just a guess.

Anyone know? I got a 94.