4 banger LC, thoughts? (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Even though it looks unexciting, it gets you where you need to go" :lol:
I'm thinking a Toyota rep shouldn't be saying this on camera... Just thought this was funny but also my thoughts while standing there.

:hmm:
Pretty sure they already did, I just sat in

Lexus …. Mmm ya, so nice
 
On the flip side of this is how everyone is saying this is a "bargain" when compared to the debut price of the 100 and 200 (when adjusted for inflation).

Yah it's not 90K but is not that kind of Cruiser. It's closest Toy model is a 4Runner and under that lense a stripped down one at 55K is pricey IMO.
I still want it of course but I was hoping for a truly affordable stripped down Cruiser not an air quote "affordable" Cruiser.
Let's say, hypothetically, the lc250 shared the exact same rolling chassis and drivetrain as the lc300. Would that fit the idea of cheaper LC even if it has a turbo 4 instead of the T6? What if they put a 4.6 V8 in? Or the 1GR?

It seems like a turbo 4 in the lc300 would have been doable at the same price point. Would that be more acceptable/desirable?
 
Last edited:
Let's say, hypothetically, the lc250 shared the exact same rolling chassis and drivetrain as the lc300. Would that fit the idea of cheaper LC even if it has a turbo 4 instead of the T6? What if they put a 4.6 V8 in? Or the 1GR?

It seems like a turbo 4 in the lc300 would have been doable at the same price point. Would that be more acceptable/desirable?
I have a feeling the same people would still be complaining. Because that’s basically what we got just different sheet metal.
 
the design of the LC300 would have not been exciting enough to cause the same hype the 250 did.
That is the reality of it. Regardless of everything else.

The 250 is eye-catching. Even if you don't like the design it will turn heads. The 300 body style would blend with the highlanders and I own a 300 and I am being honest.

I still kind of think the 250 looks abit clownish but still eye-catching.

The body style of the 250 is exactly what is IN right now design wise and they will get a lot of sales out the style alone.

The LC300 even the GR sport in stock form is pretty conservatively designed and has a more mature design, and nothing wrong with that as it does fit in better with the flagship role. They can have little more fun with the Prado design.

The goal of the Prado is to be the cheaper LC that attracts people and gets them into an LC and the LC250 is going to be doing that very well. Cheap is obviously relative here but you get the point.
 
Last edited:
the design of the LC300 would have not been exciting enough to cause the same hype the 250 did.
That is the reality of it. Regardless of everything else.

The 250 is eye-catching. Even if you don't like the design it will turn heads. The 300 body style would blend with the highlanders and I own a 300 and I am being honest.

I still kind of think the 250 looks abit clownish but still eye-catching.

The body style of the 250 is exactly what is IN right now design wise and they will get a lot of sales out the style alone.

I have to disagree. The plethora of unpainted plastic parts on the 250 is an eye sore. Did Toyota really have to cut out the cost of painting the full rear bumper? Where else are they cutting costs?

Have you seen the backlash from the unpainted bumper trim on the new Subaru WRX?
 
I have to disagree. The plethora of unpainted plastic parts on the 250 is an eye sore. Did Toyota really have to cut out the cost of painting the full rear bumper? Where else are they cutting costs?

Have you seen the backlash from the unpainted bumper trim on the new Subaru WRX
That stuff can be fixed with future updates, anyway I don't mind unpainted bumpers, I would rather replace them when they get scratched than having to worry about painting them and even if they get scratched they don't look as bad as scratched painted bumpers.

As for cost cutting, without a doubt the interior will be not as nice as the 300 to touch or feel but it is not meant to be.
One thing I noticed is it has a manual hood prop instead of hood struts like the previous gen.
That is disappointing for a vehicle like the Prado.
 
Last edited:
Lol I’m still blown away with how bent out of shape people are about this. Toyota never said it was a 200 successor. Watch the Toyota international press release. Says it fits in between the 300 and the 70.
What is actually hilarious is how you cannot accept that others have a different opinion than your own. You get bent out of shape whenever someone says something you disagree with and cannot help but react and comment!
 
What is actually hilarious is how you cannot accept that others have a different opinion than your own. You get bent out of shape whenever someone says something you disagree with and cannot help but react and comment!
Nah I just don’t suffer ignorant people.
 
Are you sure they're unpainted? I think on the 4Runner some black plastics are painted. Some aren't.

I do think it looks funny to have the full rear bumper plastic be black. Looks like an unfinished bumper put on after a crash. The black bumper on the OG trail 4R looks good to me. I'd paint the upper half body color.

1693366976838.png
 
That stuff can be fixed with future updates, anyway I don't mind unpainted bumpers, I would rather replace them when hey get scratched than having to worry about painting them and even if they get scratched they don't look as bad as scratched painted bumpers.
As for cost cutting, without a doubt the interior will be not as nice as the 300 to touch or feel but it is not meant to be.
One thing I noticed is it has a manual hood prop instead of hood struts like the previous gen.
That is disappointing for a vehicle like the Prado.

For the majority of the people driving the 250, most of them will be using them for mall crawling in the States, and the likelihood of the bumper getting scratched is minimal for this use case. Why would they go after a look where it looks like a $800 beater car driving down the street found an unmatched replacement bumper at the local junk yard? It’s something Toyota should be called out for.

Along with KDSS being nixed, there’s a plethora of cost cutting measures which should have been an optional package at the very least.
 
Are you sure they're unpainted? I think on the 4Runner some black plastics are painted. Some aren't.

I do think it looks funny to have the full rear bumper plastic be black. Looks like an unfinished bumper put on after a crash. The black bumper on the OG trail 4R looks good to me. I'd paint the upper half body color.

View attachment 3414898
From the photos we have seen so far it seems all LC 250 have unpainted rear bumper but like I said I think this stuff can easily be fixed in future model years.
I personally don't see it as an issue. I really like the mid grade / base LC100/105 with the unpainted bumpers.


100:105.jpeg
 
For the majority of the people driving the 250, most of them will be using them for mall crawling in the States, and the likelihood of the bumper getting scratched is minimal for this use case. Why would they go after a look where it looks like a $800 beater car driving down the street found an unmatched replacement bumper at the local junk yard? It’s something Toyota should be called out for.

Along with KDSS being nixed, there’s a plethora of cost cutting measures which should have been an optional package at the very least.
That is true lack of KDSS is a surprise but also keep in mind the same thing happened to the LC 300. Only the GR sport currently has E-KDSS on the 300s, KDSS was more commonly available on the 200.
I think this stuff might be fixed with future model updates. It is still early and they usually fix this stuff with customer feedback.
 
The turbo 4 makes roughly the same power at 2k rpms as the 5.7 and a lot more power than the 4.7 did. The ttv6 is about double the 5.7 output at low rpms. The torque curve is almost perfectly flat because it's ecu limited to be flat from 1600-4500 rpms. The T4 should out pull the 100 across the full rpm range even without the hybrid. It's not until about 3000 rpms that the 5.7 starts to pull away. On the long passes the T4 is going to struggle with big trailers. Just like the smaller v8s and v6s do.

Open question on fuel efficiency when towing. Turbo gas engines need rich afrs to manage exhaust temps so they tend to burn a lot of fuel. But compared to the outgoing v8s it should still be better.
I have a 22 Tundra with the TTV6 non hybrid. I get around 19/20 combined mileage around town and commute. Towing a 25‘ camper up “The Ike” I got about 6 or 7, on more regular roads about 10. Driving a brick while pulling a brick you are not going to get great mileage. But the power and torque from this engine is absolutely glorious. It will tow like no one’s business.

since the LC hybrid system will be set up similar to the Tundra, which is inline with the transmission and leans towards power and torque instead of efficiency, I fully expect this LC to have PLENTY of power. Look at GM with the 2.7 and Ford with the 2.3, 2.7, and 3.5, all quite beastly little turbos and coupled with the battery, this Toyota powertrain is going to crush it.
 
From the photos we have seen so far it seems all LC 250 have unpainted rear bumper but like I said I think this stuff can easily be fixed in future model years.
I personally don't see it as an issue. I really like the mid grade / base LC100/105 with the unpainted bumpers.


View attachment 3414899
1693367521274.png

I like this look better. Not sure if it is real or a render. But it's what I would probably do. Wouldn't be terribly expensive to get it painted.
 
You know what I am really waiting to see?
What the most basic LC250 is going to look like.
So far we have seen what the most basic US market LC 250 looks like ( 1958 )

I am waiting to see the base GCC spec version or the Toyota Gibraltar version.
One thing we can be sure based off the global press release and different engine/transmission options is no more manual transmission and I also remember reading that the back door spare tire carrier is no longer available.

To give you an idea
this is currently the most basic LC150.



lj150-gkmee-C1.jpg
 
The biggest problem is the parking sensors can’t be painted very easily. It makes it cost prohibitive.
They're okay to paint. I think most are intended to be painted because they usually come unfinished and get painted to match in collision repair.
 
One thing that's cool is for the side fender flares on the 300, Toyota actually sells them painted with the specific color code of each vehicle.
So if you damage the original ones you can easily replace them and not worry about painting them.

I still hate them do they keep lifting on my 300 in the rear and its such a hassle but they give the option for people to easily put after market fenders when installing wider tires.

I imagine that in 20 years they will sell them unpainted.
So i guess its nice to enjoy the perks of getting spare parts for a vehicle that's actually in production.

I think you could also get ready painted lc80 bumpers but not sure if those are still in production @OGBeno probably knows the status.
 
They're okay to paint. I think most are intended to be painted because they usually come unfinished and get painted to match in collision repair.

If they tune them from the factory to not have paint on them, I would have to imagine the sensitivity would be out of whack if you throw a layer of paint and clear on them. This is pure conjecture, but it seems logical.

Maybe a body repair specialist can weight in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom