with all the bearings problems and new motors needed on the new 600, makes me sadEspecially the Overtrail version of the LX600 and LX700.
i had high hopes for the 600 being the 200 replacement—- however with this trash motor it is an embarrassment
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
with all the bearings problems and new motors needed on the new 600, makes me sadEspecially the Overtrail version of the LX600 and LX700.
I have always preferred n/a engines, particularly V8’s, the noise, the instant throttle response. From what I have read the Toyota 300 series diesel (australia), it is a capable and efficient engine by many accounts, but to me it’s still laggy and completely underwhelming. No soul. No smiles.Willstroo,
Would you expand on this? What was wrong with the 300?
I have been thinking that the LX600 was the best successor to the LC200 available to us.
This last sentence cuts deep.Thanks for the input.
I have no intentions to replace my 200. But it’s always good to have a plan just in case.
At some point it will be harder and harder to find a 200 or 570 that’s in good shape.
I will repeat what I stated in 2019 when the new BMW Supra was introduced. The Armada/Patrol is not a Toyota product, so from that alone.. its not a successor to me, regardless of how reliable or capable it might beI don’t think so. In my opinion, there are two “successors” until/unless we get a real 300.
The LX600 is the first that comes to mind for reasons that everyone here already knows. But it has two problems that make it not a clear successor to me: 1) It is a compromised product by way of its completely impractical front grille
2) Gaudy exterior and image. The appeal of the LC was it not being completely obnoxious yet extremely comfortable and capable. The. LX600 is in my opinions the most obnoxious looking bof vehicle on sale.
-The 200 is from the factory ready to tackle any terrain, even in stock tires, and the Toyota badge and exterior design is understated and powerful.
The 2025 Armada/Patrol. It has a comparable, yet not equal, reputation for reliability and capability throughout the world where the real models were sold (ME, AUS, etc). It has 3 rows, better out of the box performance in Pro4X trim than a 200 (rear locker standard), and is cheaper than a 200 series.
Glaring issue: it’s not a toyota.
GX550 is just not comparable from what I’ve read. Between that engine, poor build quality, gaudy exterior, 2 rows, impractical bumper… problems too numerous to a be successor.
I believe the new 2025+ Armada is the best overall successor to the 200 series for the same reasons I purchased a 200.
And it will get harder and harder to get parts.Thanks for the input.
I have no intentions to replace my 200. But it’s always good to have a plan just in case.
At some point it will be harder and harder to find a 200 or 570 that’s in good shape.
With Toyota products like the 3rd gen Tundra, are Toyota products Toyota products in 2025I will repeat what I stated in 2019 when the new BMW Supra was introduced. The Armada/Patrol is not a Toyota product, so from that alone.. its not a successor to me, regardless of how reliable or capable it might be![]()
Touché. But at least its a Toyota and hopefully those 3.4 issues have already been resolved, particularly in the GX.With Toyota products like the 3rd gen Tundra, are Toyota products Toyota products in 2025![]()
they never resolved them in the LS500, and continued that trash in the GX/LX/TundraTouché. But at least its a Toyota and hopefully those 3.4 issues have already been resolved, particularly in the GX.
Right. I remember that initially, but thought the Tundra/LX 3.4 recall resolved (or in process of).they never resolved them in the LS500, and continued that trash in the GX/LX/Tundra
they are always being "resolved"Right. I remember that initially, but thought the Tundra/LX 3.4 recall resolved (or in process of).
I consider the valley plate leak part of the normal Toyota V8 experiencethey are always being "resolved"
like my first ISF had valley plate leak
wife's RCF has same problem 12 y ears later... ridiculous..
diff problems in the LC... etc etc
One can dream.I do hope they relax on CAFE regulations and we can get one last hurrah for V8 platforms.
Trash motor? Not the first time I have heard things about new vehicles but I have little concern long term.with all the bearings problems and new motors needed on the new 600, makes me sad
i had high hopes for the 600 being the 200 replacement—- however with this trash motor it is an embarrassment
yeah we make excuses for TOyota all the time..I consider the valley plate leak part of the normal Toyota V8 experienceThat's a 2 banana 6 pack of beers job. Foreign material on 3.4s engine bearings is another question lol.
new vehicles - motor bearings go - and motors go kaput? That is normal on new vehicles?Trash motor? Not the first time I have heard things about new vehicles but I have little concern long term.
I have both and the G is such a wonderful beast in its own way. But it is not a replacement or successor to the LC.If one was looking to replace a 200 Series, what about one of those German things. What are they called?
Oh, yeah. A Gelato Wagen.
Is that right?