Is there a noticeable difference in rear 2nd seat leg room between an 80 series and 100?
100 vs 80 2nd seat room
- Thread starter gray rider
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
If you mean between the front row and middle row, then yes, the 100 series has more foot room for middle row passengers.
Not a huge amount but it is noticeable.
- Thread starter
- #5
Because I wanted to know. And I thought this would be the place to ask, assuming some 100 owners may have previously owned 80's.
- Thread starter
- #7
@spressomon:
Thanks very much for the link!
Just what I needed!!
Thanks very much for the link!
Just what I needed!!
the 100 is bigger all around, at 6'4" the 80 I used to own was hilariously small inside compared to the exterior mass of the vehicle. It didnt bother me much from the drivers seat but my passengers (especially in the back) complained at times. in my 100 series I have yet to have a complaint about the back seat room.
Yep, the seat goes forward a lot... but not back much. And, the rear leg/foot room is pretty weak for a truck this size. I drive with the seat all the way back, my 5'9" daughter has to sit behind my wife or she's eating her knees. If the 80 has less room, that must really suck.
It really sucks. I can't put my son's rear facing seat behind me or I'd be kissing the air bag. In my 80 btw.
I've owned several 80's and 100's. I don't sit in the back, ever, but, my kids will tell you, there's no discernible difference.....
I needed more leg room so traded my 200 
to get a tundra double cab. Kept my 80 and will add land tank extenders. Sorry back seat passengers on the 80 you will have to ride in the tundra limo.
to get a tundra double cab. Kept my 80 and will add land tank extenders. Sorry back seat passengers on the 80 you will have to ride in the tundra limo.