Why would Toyota go to a Li-lon then a LiFEPO then back to a Li-lon battery?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Threads
121
Messages
2,488
Location
USA
Why would Toyota go to a Li-lon then a LiFEPO then back to a Li-lon battery?

EV car plans.

toyota battery plan.jpg
 
Driving range?

It’s interesting to see the solid state. I hope that works out.
 
Probably to navigate the complexities of procurement and scaling.

Each chemistry has its advantages. Generally, Li-Ion is considered higher tech with higher power density but LiFePO has its own advantages such as long term durability and higher SOC tolerance.

IMO, sometimes the general public reads too far into the enabling technologies. What's almost more important is the integration and final product and specs at the system level. Done right, each of these battery chemistries are highly viable.

The distinguisher might be completely unrelated - like Toyota being way behind with no compelling EVs, infrastructure, and game changing performance/tech. I say that as a frustrated Toyota fan. They're currently throwing around marketing thoughts of some notional future solid state battery... that will delivered by other competitors first. And who ever thought hydrogen cars (aka EV with a hydrogen battery) was a good idea?
 
200-series tech?
 
Why would Toyota go to a Li-lon then a LiFEPO then back to a Li-lon battery?

EV car plans.

View attachment 3493431
Right their in the header: Popularization (ie lower cost, bigger market) focus over Performance, later as costs come down they were start to merger performance and popularity.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom