SWUtah said:That does it I'm trading my 99 in for a 2003 Mercedes SL500 before it starts falling apart.![]()
Go for something more sexy and *trouble free* like a new 2007 Z06 Vette... misery loves company.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
SWUtah said:That does it I'm trading my 99 in for a 2003 Mercedes SL500 before it starts falling apart.![]()
a990dna said:Go for something more sexy and *trouble free* like a new 2007 Z06 Vette... misery loves company.![]()
Jim_Chow said:It seems from the posts here that the 100's up until '04 have been pretty much problem free (other than the exhaust manifolds, starter contacts due to age). Then the '04's debut w/ nav bugs, '05-06's with other problems. I wonder if the QC issues on newer LC's has anything to do w/ Araco not assembling them anymore? It could (and more likely) also be that the QC/assembly gurus w/ 40+ yrs experience in LC's at Araco retired and some new, less-experienced guys replaced them. This is a problem/concern for Japanese (and US) companies these days.
NMuzj100 said:This thread would be more useful if the posts were limited to those with more than 100k. I am pretty sure that most of our trucks would go 100k with no PM and still have no major problems.
NMuzj100 said:This thread would be more useful if the posts were limited to those with more than 100k. I am pretty sure that most of our trucks would go 100k with no PM and still have no major problems.
a990dna said:I agree with calamari on this too ... maybe the topic should be changed and made a sticky.
I'm guilty of being a picky when I spend $60K for a vehicle... I expect my money's worth. I could have paid cash for a GM and stayed out of debt.. but I didn't want to spend all my time at the dealer seeking repairs.
As a follow up to my new Land Crusier problems. They finally reset the T-bar pre-load on the driver-side. Its the way it should have been adjusted from the factory. Both front R/L side ride heights are even, and the spring rate feels the same now.
That was the easy part..
As far as the knock coming from the suspension... they had it for five (5) days trying to figure this out with Toyota engineers involved. They found the layers in the frame were coming into contact and popping when the frame flexed... causing it to knock intermittently, no rhyme or reason. I spoke with the lead mechanic at he said it drove them crazy trying to locate the source.
I'm still unclear how they actually fixed it.. saying something to the effect they located the area through the holes in the frame and tapped or separated the inner layers so they don't come into contact.
I asked if Toyota had a TSB on it.. they said no, but the engineers heard of this happening before.
I still may follow up with a Toyota field engineer for a re-inspection.
NMuzj100 said:If SWUtah is happy then OK.
But these are two totally different sets of problems
1. Things that wear out or require attention at high miles (100-200-300k miles).
2. Quality control issues for new vehicles (Generating a list for new buyers to inspect while still under warranty or even lemon-law status)
97k - Fluid changes/serpentine belt replaced - Only problems Cat shield rattle (not yet addressed) and TSB sensor problem (2x 20,000 miles ago) not fixed but no further problems either. Still on OEM battery and planning my 90k service. The truck also needs the T-Bars reindexed to correct a 1/2" lean to the left on the front.