Who has the most miles on their 100 with the fewest problems? (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

SWUtah said:
That does it I'm trading my 99 in for a 2003 Mercedes SL500 before it starts falling apart. :)

Go for something more sexy and *trouble free* like a new 2007 Z06 Vette... misery loves company. :flipoff2:
 
a990dna said:
Go for something more sexy and *trouble free* like a new 2007 Z06 Vette... misery loves company. :flipoff2:

I just love the looks of the 2003-2007 SL500's. I know the 2006's have improved quality but still not up to Toyota standards. I can pick up a 2003 with around 20-30K miles for between $58-62K but I think I would need an extended warranty :) Plus a 2 seater as my only vehicle would not be good so I would need to buy a $1000 beater for the bad snow days when they did the salt. O'well I'm just dreaming. My LC still looks and drives new and only has 67K miles. Wish I had more money :)
 
1999 w/ 123,000 miles. I did the timing belt at 120,000, and starter about 100,000. No repairs beyond that. My last LC was a 1988 with 160,000, and I never did any repairs on it!
 
It seems from the posts here that the 100's up until '04 have been pretty much problem free (other than the exhaust manifolds, starter contacts due to age). Then the '04's debut w/ nav bugs, '05-06's with other problems. I wonder if the QC issues on newer LC's has anything to do w/ Araco not assembling them anymore? It could (and more likely) also be that the QC/assembly gurus w/ 40+ yrs experience in LC's at Araco retired and some new, less-experienced guys replaced them. This is a problem/concern for Japanese (and US) companies these days.
 
my 06 lx 470 13,000 miles
1 passenger mirror broke
2 sunroof rattle and grind when operating
3 rear hatch leak (2x's fix lets hope its done)
4evac sens failure (vsc problem)

wish i had my 99 back it had 82k when i traded it in and nothing ever broke (except the radio; cd got stuck inside) but that does not count. if anyone is listening the older units i think 03 and down are still better; better quality control i guess.
 
Jim_Chow said:
It seems from the posts here that the 100's up until '04 have been pretty much problem free (other than the exhaust manifolds, starter contacts due to age). Then the '04's debut w/ nav bugs, '05-06's with other problems. I wonder if the QC issues on newer LC's has anything to do w/ Araco not assembling them anymore? It could (and more likely) also be that the QC/assembly gurus w/ 40+ yrs experience in LC's at Araco retired and some new, less-experienced guys replaced them. This is a problem/concern for Japanese (and US) companies these days.

Jim I think you are right. I was thinking about getting a 2004 but my 99 only has 67K miles and it's good to go until I hit 90K miles and need to change driveline fluids (did the tbelt and water pump at 58K miles). Mine has some cosmetic issues, bodyside molding peeling (fixed with touchup paint). Since mine is paid for and low mileage it might be stupid to buy a 2004 with 30K miles for an additional $23K. I guess nav and traction control and a perfect body isn't worth a $350 a month car payment for the next 72 months :)
 
Yeah, it seems like we are experiencing some kind of change in quality. Could be related to the people fixing them as well regarding their experience and technical abilities. Some of the things I've complained about (other than above) are nit picky, but they are things that you just want fixed and don't expect on a 60K vehicle. I can say I have never been completetly happy with a new vehicle and I thought I would be with the Flagship Toyota. You buy a new car for the convenience of it not breaking down or having to take it in for minor fixes. That being said, for an equally equipped SUV (and you can pick the brand) I have found nothing compares. I'm sure a bunch will agree (since this is the Landcruiser/LX forum)
:)

I expect 4-5 years from now we could ask the same question and get similiar answers as today: Timing Belt, Brake pads- hopefully they have figured out the manifolds for our rigs. All the other stuff for us new model owners will be a faint memory.
 
Last edited:
I have a 1999 coming up on 88k miles. I've owned it since 3/05 and done only routine maint. (60k service, pads, rotors, oil, etc). The only issue I've had is the parking brake never worked. I never looked into it b/c I'm in South Florida. About 2 weeks ago my brakes quit (almost completely) and my ABS light came on and buzzed. I limped into the shop and it was diagnosed as my brake 'power booster motor and accumulator'. It cost me $1860 after taxes and labor. The parts were a little over $1300. The dealer said it is very uncommon for that to go and they had only seen it 1 other time. Lucky me! I'm in the middle of selling the truck too. Anyone interested let me know and I can send the autotrader link. '99 TLC, 88k miles, rear locker, $16500 OBO. Otherwise it has been a great truck, as I expected. I'm curious to see if there really is a quality control issue with some of the newer LC's. I would like to get an '04-'06 in the next year or two. Unitl then, I'm getting a 4-runner and freeing up some cash to finish my FJ40. That is my comprimise.
 
Mine's a 2000 with 136K miles.

Failed and Replaced:
Driver's door electric lock solenoid assembly.
Power radio antenna.
Couple of taillight bulbs.
Oxygen sensor (1 failed, but replaced both front ones)

Failed, but not repaired/replaced:
CD changer. With XM, it's not a problem for me.

Preventive Maintenance:
Oil & Filter every 5k miles.
Timing belt at 95k miles.
Serpentine belt at 95k miles.
Air filter element at ? miles.

That's all that comes to mind.
 
02 with 35K on it. :flipoff2: :flipoff2:
 
Last edited:
This thread would be more useful if the posts were limited to those with more than 100k. I am pretty sure that most of our trucks would go 100k with no PM and still have no major problems.
 
NMuzj100 said:
This thread would be more useful if the posts were limited to those with more than 100k. I am pretty sure that most of our trucks would go 100k with no PM and still have no major problems.

I disagree. I think it is useful for potential buyers to see what sort of PM their used vehicles are looking at, early on and later on.
 
My wife's 99 LX470 has 87,000 miles and no major problems...just been changing the fluids and brakes/belts. Needing to do the full 90K service soon though...
 
NMuzj100 said:
This thread would be more useful if the posts were limited to those with more than 100k. I am pretty sure that most of our trucks would go 100k with no PM and still have no major problems.

I agree with calamari on this too ... maybe the topic should be changed and made a sticky.

I'm guilty of being a picky when I spend $60K for a vehicle... I expect my money's worth. I could have paid cash for a GM and stayed out of debt.. but I didn't want to spend all my time at the dealer seeking repairs.

As a follow up to my new Land Crusier problems. They finally reset the T-bar pre-load on the driver-side. Its the way it should have been adjusted from the factory. Both front R/L side ride heights are even, and the spring rate feels the same now.

That was the easy part..

As far as the knock coming from the suspension... they had it for five (5) days trying to figure this out with Toyota engineers involved. They found the layers in the frame were coming into contact and popping when the frame flexed... causing it to knock intermittently, no rhyme or reason. I spoke with the lead mechanic at he said it drove them crazy trying to locate the source.

I'm still unclear how they actually fixed it.. saying something to the effect they located the area through the holes in the frame and tapped or separated the inner layers so they don't come into contact.

I asked if Toyota had a TSB on it.. they said no, but the engineers heard of this happening before.

I still may follow up with a Toyota field engineer for a re-inspection.
 
a990dna said:
I agree with calamari on this too ... maybe the topic should be changed and made a sticky.

I'm guilty of being a picky when I spend $60K for a vehicle... I expect my money's worth. I could have paid cash for a GM and stayed out of debt.. but I didn't want to spend all my time at the dealer seeking repairs.

As a follow up to my new Land Crusier problems. They finally reset the T-bar pre-load on the driver-side. Its the way it should have been adjusted from the factory. Both front R/L side ride heights are even, and the spring rate feels the same now.

That was the easy part..

As far as the knock coming from the suspension... they had it for five (5) days trying to figure this out with Toyota engineers involved. They found the layers in the frame were coming into contact and popping when the frame flexed... causing it to knock intermittently, no rhyme or reason. I spoke with the lead mechanic at he said it drove them crazy trying to locate the source.

I'm still unclear how they actually fixed it.. saying something to the effect they located the area through the holes in the frame and tapped or separated the inner layers so they don't come into contact.

I asked if Toyota had a TSB on it.. they said no, but the engineers heard of this happening before.

I still may follow up with a Toyota field engineer for a re-inspection.

Good post a990dna, this is the kind of stuff I wanted to bring out in this thread. I also think this kind of thread should be made a sticky with the BS posts taken out. Gives people a good feel for problems based on miles/model year and maintance.
 
If SWUtah is happy then OK.

But these are two totally different sets of problems

1. Things that wear out or require attention at high miles (100-200-300k miles).
2. Quality control issues for new vehicles (Generating a list for new buyers to inspect while still under warranty or even lemon-law status)

97k - Fluid changes/serpentine belt replaced - Only problems Cat shield rattle (not yet addressed) and TSB sensor problem (2x 20,000 miles ago) not fixed but no further problems either. Still on OEM battery and planning my 90k service. The truck also needs the T-Bars reindexed to correct a 1/2" lean to the left on the front.

Edit to add: "D" light out but I really consider that a improvement.

Edit 9/23/2007:
- Replaced starter contacts at 103k when I was turning the key but not getting a start all the time.
- Had to replace the battery at 106k. Went with a regular Group 27.
- Had a single CEL/limpmode caused by the TPS problem (Code P1128) at 114k. All was fine after turning the vehicle off and a restart. I haven't decided if I should order the parts and fix it or just see how long it goes before the next CEL. Once every ~20k isn't too bad.
- Fried the stock trailer wiring converter box and replaced it with an after market unit.
- Sunroof wind deflector finally broke and I haven't missed it yet
- replaced two taillights
 
Last edited:
NMuzj100 said:
If SWUtah is happy then OK.

But these are two totally different sets of problems

1. Things that wear out or require attention at high miles (100-200-300k miles).
2. Quality control issues for new vehicles (Generating a list for new buyers to inspect while still under warranty or even lemon-law status)

97k - Fluid changes/serpentine belt replaced - Only problems Cat shield rattle (not yet addressed) and TSB sensor problem (2x 20,000 miles ago) not fixed but no further problems either. Still on OEM battery and planning my 90k service. The truck also needs the T-Bars reindexed to correct a 1/2" lean to the left on the front.

Might need two sticky's to address 1 & 2. But it would be a good source of information and give everyone a feel for whats happening with different model year LC/LX's
 
1999 UZJ100.
125,231 Miles

Did the 90,000 at 102,000 and was told that the waterpump was good. I hope that doesn't come back to bite me. I did the spark plugs at 122,000 and the PO did the brakes right before I bought it at 87,000.

I also had the power booster motor and accumulator fail on me TWICE around 115,000 Like Rumbum said it is close to a $2000 job especially if you need a rental while they get the part. They had never done the job before at the Homestead Dealership.

It took 13 days for the Homestead Dealer to return my truck, just for it to fail again 260 miles later. Luckily I got a lifetime guarentee on that part and the second one was free and included more parts. The dealer in Lakeland also replaced the fluid reservoir in just 3 days over the weekend and gave me a camry to play with. It didn't pull the boat like the cruiser, but beggers can't be choosers. Needless to say, my big jobs are going to Lakeland Toyota from now on. The booster that failed after 260 mi did not look like OEM, there were no yellow stickers and it was more bronze in color. The last one that Lakeland put in looked exactly like the original, only much cleaner and it has been fine for 10,000mi. "D" light just went out 2 weeks ago and I like it that way.

Travis,

PS. My driver side lumbar has never worked since I bought the truck, but a rolled up sweatshirt does the trick.
 
My 2001 has 112K on it; did the full 90K right on schedule. I also had the timing belt replaced at 90K along with the serp belt, water pump and idler pulleys just for peace of mind.

I change the fluids (all synthetic) every 5 to 10K since most of the miles are highway; more often if I've done some off-roading.

I have a slight ticking sound in the left exhaust manifold which I'll take care of someday but other than that it's been (knock on wood) one of the most rock solid and reliable vehicles I've ever owned.
 
98 98,400mi, lumbar switch out, one tail light replaced, D light out. 90K done, Lost RR caliper at 92K. (poor choice of mechanics by previous owner, who also removed the cats) DUMB A** Slee sliders & Dif Drop, arb/warn winch, kaymar, OME, BFG AT 305's and a plastic propeller in the hitch. Beats driving the old rusty 64FJ40 everyday.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom