Torque value for aluminum wheels

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Is it lug centric or hub centric?
 
Not really a true answer, but on this Tacoma forum the SCS vendor account says 85ft/lbs:
@cruiserdan has as post that I believe is the definitive torque spec for 70 series. I don’t have time to look it up and post it, but it’s not in a Taco forum!
 
90 ft lbs
do a few passes around the lugs though
 
thats what toyota recommends for my tundra's aluminum wheels
the lugs do have a captive washer tho so idk if that makes a difference
 
Last edited:
I’ve been using 90 lbs for my F5’s since I got them. I’ve got them on both Cruisers.
Those splined lug nuts are the best I’ve ever used, solid threads and they lock down
perfectly in those wheels. Just remember to check ‘em after 100 k or so.
 
IIRC the factory 80 series aluminum wheels that use those shank style nuts calls for 76 ft/lbs.
 
My alloys, I torque them by feel.
I figure it's no good if I can't remove a damaged tire on the side of the road.
Too much for AL
I agree 90 is too much.
 
Does the Toyota 70 series owners manual specify torque spec for 'alloy wheels'? I contacted SCS directly and the answer
was owners manual. Would not provide a torque spec for their wheels/lugnuts combination.
 

FJ HJ BJ 60 70 73 75 Series Chassis & Body Manual From 10/84 thru 1/90 36262E​


I downloaded the only manual I could find after looking thru another that actually had a listing for wheel lugnut torque
spec. It specifies 101 ft/lbs . My personal feeling is it's not the wheel that determines the torque but the stud diameter
and thread. I could be wrong. I listed the page number and location in manual in title of attached pdf
 

Attachments

Do your alloys have steel inserts? I don't think they do as I believe you have shanked (not conical) lugs.

I have a set of aftermarket two-piece wheels, the rims are cold spun and the centers are machined from billet, Japanese made articles (Epsilon). They are hub centric and have steel inserts at the seat of each lug hole to fit a conical lug nuts. I use steel torque specs (101-109 ft/lbs) per the makers. If they were regular cast alloys with no inserts I would have not exceeded 76 ft/lbs.
 
Hello,

The owner's manual says 116 ft lb.

Chances are it is a bit too much for aluminum wheels.

It may be wise to use the copper grease rule, i. e., torque to 70% of the specification value. This would be 81.2 ft lb.





Juan
 
My personal feeling is it's not the wheel that determines the torque but the stud diameter
and thread. I could be wrong.

With the aluminum 80 wheels there are 2 types, one that uses the shank style lug nut, and one that has a steel insert in the lug holes that use the conical style. The wheel is identical otherwise, but the torque specs are much different. Same stud diameter.

Pic stolen from somewhere on mud...

1715796321616.png


I have shank style on my 81 and the conical style on my BJ74.... this reminds me I need to go knock a bit of torque off one and add a little to the other :lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom