The benefits of aftermarket links

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

NCFJ

Supporting Vendor
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Threads
218
Messages
10,589
Location
Chesnee, SC
I posted this thread a while back over on the FJ Cruiser forum. I figured I'd post it here as well, it answers a lot of questions.


I have been getting a lot of questions lately from customers in regard to rear upper and lower links so I figured I would try to answer them in a thread. The main question is,” What are the benefits of aftermarket links for my FJ”
The benefits of aftermarket links are basically two fold. The first benefit is strength. The stock links, both lower and upper are anemic at best and in my opinion under built. Anyone that has wheeled their FJ in the rocks has either bent a lower link themselves or seen it done by others.
2987197617_8d40373797_b.jpg

The worst case of this is that the link gets a kink in it and then tears on the link leaving the vehicle without a major rear axle location component. The tube used on the OEM links is 1.25” in diameter and has less than a .120” wall thickness. That is less than 1/8”. Our replacement links us 1.5” X .250” wall DOM tube on the standard links and 1.75” X .250” DOM on the adjustable links. The standard links can also be ordered with the 1.75 DOM tube as well.
2981455568_a54cafc86d_b.jpg

Bending can also be an issue with upper links. These links use aprox. ½” tube. The photo shows a link from my FJ that was “stress” bent. The only explanation I can give is that the suspension moved farther than the link could handle and it bent. It was bent down. Our replacement links use 1.25” X .125 wall DOM tube, far stronger than the tube it replaces.
4332696810_377c060224_b.jpg

5234695058_8e452dafa1_b.jpg

The second benefit of aftermarket links is the use of better end links. In our case we use a Johnny Joint on one end that provides 30 degrees of side movement and a high quality, graphite impregnated urethane joint on the other end. What the combination of these joints does is allow the rear suspension to move freely.
I am often asked if our links provide more travel of the rear axle. The answer is no. If pushed hard enough the stock links will max out the available travel of the rear axle. What the Johnny Joints and urethane rod ends do is allow the axle to move much easier. You will notice this most in the area of droop, where the old links held the axle back, the new links allow it to get to full droop without the links holding it back.
The problem with the OEM links is the rubber bushing used, both upper and lower. The way this bushing works is at the heart of the problem. The inner sleeve, where the bolt goes through the bushing, gets locked to the axle and the frame when the mounting bolt is tightened down. The sleeve can not move. The rubber bushing is fused to this sleeve and also to the outer sleeve. The outer sleeve is then pressed into the rod end.
5487222001_fd2e47b48c_b.jpg

What happens is that when the link rotates on the bushing the rubber twists and creates tension. If you were to remove the 4 bolts holding the upper and lower links to the axle and remove the panhard bar and remove the axle from the rig this would leave all 4 links hanging in space from their frame side mounts. If you were to pull down on any of these links and release it, it would spring back to it’s original position.
The Johnny Joints and urethane joints both swivel freely and would simply rotate down until something stopped their travel. The Jonny Joint also allows 30 degrees of movement side to side, or in “twist”. This is more movement than the stock geometry of the FJ will allow, thus only one Johnny joint used.
One more point. For those of you that have added a lift to your rig and have the stock links in place. Go out and loosen the mounting bolts to all 4 of your links and then tighten them back up. This will release the tension stored in the rubber bushing that was put in when you installed the lift. What happens is that when you lift the truck you change the ride position of the links, they swivel down. But the links are still locked in and this twists the rubber in the bushing causing the bushing to be under stress while just sitting there.
I hope that this helps answer some of the questions I have been hearing.
 
Did you ever get the measurements you needed? Just realized I'm a short drive down the road from you in Newberry.
 
The problem with the OEM links is the rubber bushing used, both upper and lower. The way this bushing works is at the heart of the problem. The inner sleeve, where the bolt goes through the bushing, gets locked to the axle and the frame when the mounting bolt is tightened down. The sleeve can not move. The rubber bushing is fused to this sleeve and also to the outer sleeve. The outer sleeve is then pressed into the rod end.
Curious, at the lower control arm's fully extended and/or fully compressed position (and disconnected at the axle side), approximately how much force is actually required to hold the LCA in place?

I wonder, considering the weight of the axle/wheels and the weight of the vehicle, is this really a problem?
 
Curious, at the lower control arm's fully extended and/or fully compressed position (and disconnected at the axle side), approximately how much force is actually required to hold the LCA in place?

I wonder, considering the weight of the axle/wheels and the weight of the vehicle, is this really a problem?

Any tension present in the link ends, which are the joints between the axle and frame, inhibits how smooth and free the suspension moves.

This system is installed on a great many FJ Cruisers. I have noticed and a great many customers have told me that they notice better performance from the rear axle.
 
Curious, at the lower control arm's fully extended and/or fully compressed position (and disconnected at the axle side), approximately how much force is actually required to hold the LCA in place?

I wonder, considering the weight of the axle/wheels and the weight of the vehicle, is this really a problem?


I don't see the tension in the bushings as being a big issue. The forces to compress the spring and shock is way more than that. It is correct to loosen the bolts when you have done a suspension install just to remove any constant tension on the bushing due to height changes.

However when you take the force needed to compress the axle up, what percentage does the bushing actually contribute to the force needed? As for droop, again how much does that restrict compared to the weight?

When we have pulled axles out and the links are still attached to the vehicle frame, you can easily move it with one finger.
 
What is cost of the fixed length LCA's with the 1.75 X .250” wall DOM?

Thanks.
 
I don’t want to get into a debate here. My point is simply that the OEM bushings are a built in source of tension. Yes, I too can move a stock arm with stock bushings that is locked down on one side and then move the other end with one finger. When I let go it comes back to the original position. Now multiply that tension by 8. Sure you can move it with the weight of the axle, my point is that with aftermarket bushings there is NO similar tension.

Try twisting that same link with a bar in the other end of the link, not so easy. The OEM bushings will also wear out rather fast in an off road setting from the added twisting as the axle cycles up and down.

It is up to the consumer to decide if improving the movement of the rear axle is for them or not. The tension in the bushings is not a huge issue, it is an issue that can be delt with when building aftermarket links. The lower links require stronger tube than OEM, using bushings that continue the issue of tension and break down faster when twisted just makes no sense to me
 
What is cost of the fixed length LCA's with the 1.75 X .250” wall DOM?

Thanks.
Fixed length lower links with 1.75 tube is $ 295.00 per pair

Stan
 
What is your experience with bushing on the 100 and the longevity of them vs a Johny joint? We hardly ever replace the bushings due to wear. Maybe now in the 80 series due to age, but it is simply not common for the rubber to fail. I would venture that the maintenance on a Johny joint is going to be more than that of a rubber bushing.

There is also the whole debate of should the suspension always move free and is it a good thing? Some tension to prevent sudden unloading when you drop off a ledge is a nice thing to have. But that is for another day.

Stronger arms, yes that is needed, but the additional noise / premature wear of joints that loosen up is simply not worth it for the little gain in "freedom". Just my 0.02c.

Some urethane bushings have the center sleeve separate from the bonded piece. So that provides the same unrestricted movement.

Just for the record, I am commenting in this thread since the title was benefits of the arms. This is exactly where to discuss the options. This is not a comment on the vendor or the products they offer. I stayed out of the thread where the arms are offered for sale.
 
No offense taken. Just my point of view and my solution to the subject at hand. I have been playing with vehicles of all sorts all my life and they all have one thing in common. Once you modify it from it's original state you increase the level of maintenance. Some people won't want to grease the links let alone rebuild them down the line.

I disagree with you on if the links are worth the gain in freedom. The links on the FJC and the 100 use the same type bushings, the FJC uses smaller bushings on the uppers. The FJC has improved movement of the axle. Yes, the suspension should always be free to move, good shocks will take care of sudden unloading and bump stops and limit straps will handle full droop if it becomes an issue of any binding or the springs floating.
 
Thanks NCFJ & Christo. I'm partial to the OEM bushings since reliability and low maintenance are high up on my priorities... the LX 'to do' list is already too long as it is. It's not a rock crawler nor race truck either.

It is nice to have choices. I think most will agree the OEM arms are fairly easy to bend. So far, these are the choices I've seen:

OEM (1.25" x .120?)
OEM sleeved or reinforced w/ angle iron
Slee (27.4mm Solid steel w/ polyester bushings)
Wild West Fab (1.75" x .250 w/ OME poly bushings)
HFS/Toyoutfitters (1.5" or 1.75" x .250 adjustable w/ JJ & Urethane bushing)
SpressoFAB (1.5" x .375 w/OEM rubber bushings) *NLA

And then there are a few more extended length choices for the 80 series... but they are geared towards 4+" lift.
 
Well stated hoser!
 
I'm definitely way out my league here but I've also read somewhere on here that the LCA's are relatively weak to provide an easily replaceable weak link in the rear suspension...as opposed to a harder to replace and more expensive piece....
 
Spressomon:
You ever going to do another batch of your arms with the rubber bushings for the 100? If you were, I would be in for a set. Hint hint hint!;)
 
Shelved...too costly to build.
 
The stock links seem to be good for about 200,000 miles. There is no way you are going to bend the upper links. Lowers are a different story, just turn them over and wait for them to bend back straight or weld on angle as many others have. Those pictures are FJ cruiser parts and not relative to the 100 series or this forum. This thread is not tech but advertising for NCFJ. No?
 
farinvail said:
This thread is not tech but advertising for NCFJ. No?

I for one have found the dialog helpful in thinking about the relative merits of upgrades on this front....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom