2007 LC with AHC. Shortly after purchasing my LC in 2022, it was recommended that I swap out the rear springs and torsion bars for non-AHC stock springs and torsion bars because I planned to add a new roof rack and tent, and a drawer system. I followed the recommendations. It has driven poorly since.
Things I've replaced (that have proven unrelated): sway bar bushings, sway bar links, brake rebuilds, AHC globes, front AHC "shocks", front upper/lower control arms.
I now suspect the rear springs are too stiff. Not sure if torsion bars can also be too stiff. One, both, or a combination seem to be the problem. I finally got Techstream (I have no idea why I waited so long) and have measurements that I'd like help interpreting.
"As-Found" Heights:
Front Left: 20 1/4"
Front Right: 19 1/2"
Rear Left: 22 1/8"
Rear Right: 21 5/8"
"As-Found" Pressures (measured twice to ensure accuracy):
Front: 3.5
Rear: 4.5
Rear Pressure: This seems like a clear indicator that I need to revert to AHC springs (or perhaps Kings).
Front Pressure: I was surprised by this. I don't know how to correct for this. Do I really crank my torsion bars 18 turns each side? If so WHICH WAY DO I CRANK? COUNTERCLOCKWISE FOR BOTH LEFT AND RIGHT? Or, is this ridiculously low pressure an indicator of something more than torsion cranking?
Thank you. Alas, I no longer have the original springs or TBs. Believe it or not those pressure readings are with rack, tent, drawers and me sitting in the drivers seat.
I’ll go back and review the page 1 instructions. Does it make sense to swap out springs and keep the existing TBs to check the ride? Or do the front numbers indicate the TBs need to be swapped period?
@DubR
Howsitgoin with the suspension?
The whole idea with the AHC system on the 100 is that all the suspension damping is handled by the valves in the actuators, which then work the same way as normal shock absorbers. One prerequisite for this to work is that there is enough pressure on the ahc system and that the "shocks" are carrying enough weight to be able to control damping. The mass of the truck has to be shared between the 4 steel springs and the 4 nitrogen spheres for this to work. When you get enough pressure on the ahc fluid and the nitrogen spheres, you also get enough movement of the hydraulic fluid through the actuators to dampen the suspension movement. Without this, you get a jarring ride and a potentially dangerous road handling.
If you offload the ahc system by installing stiffer/stronger steel springs; the ahc valves, shocks and gas springs might not get enough pressure to work with; and that is what I believe has happened in your case.
For the front, the standard non-ahc torsion bars will definitely be too stiff, unless you add something really heavy up front, like 600 pounds extra.
For the rear, according to what I've read of others' experience and added to my own, it looks like King springs would be good for you.
Non-ahc rear springs could be viable if you have rear steel bar with swingouts and bike rack etc, in addition to a heavy rack and drawers, i.e. if you go over the rated max rear load.
I have seen that the rear springs (coils) do wear out pretty quickly. After 5 years the capacity is reduced so much that I consider changing them out. This has been the case with both the 80 series and the 100. The fronts can luckily be adjusted to compensate for wear.
I run the strongest OEM ahc rear springs (Brown color dot), and manage to keep pressures within range in normal, daily use. If I load up the car with 5 people and a full boot, the rear pressure will be too high, and I can't get to High without shedding some load.