T-IV transmission fluid vs ATF WS (6 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
7,366
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Posing this question since most of the posts I've searched seem to be people asking if it's OK to use Toyota ATF WS in their older vehicles spec'ed for T-IV fluid. I'd like to know if anyone knows or has experience doing the opposite - using T-IV in a modern transmission designed for ATF WS?

Was at the dealer (who I've generally had good prior experience with) a week ago for my post road-trip 120k service. (I'd considered doing this myself but my garage is about to be demolished and replaced so I'm trying to avoid doing any work in it which could potentially result in my truck sitting there immobile for any length of time for any reason). One of the things on the list was a 12 quart transmission flush.

The drive home was uneventful. After I got home I noticed on the receipt they had "00279-00ATF" listed at $4.79/quart for the service. Google doesn't turn up that part # for a Toyota fluid, though 00279-000T4 does come up as the older, non-synthetic A/T fluid. 00289-ATFWS is what shows up when I search for the (semi?)synthetic Toyota ATF WS and seems to run about $6.50/quart or more retail.

I haven't driven in a week but I made a run to the store this weekend and I noticed the transmission shifts felt "spongy" or kind of lazy. There wasn't obvious slippage (like the engine revving up during a shift), they just did not feel as defined as before. I flipped on ECT PWR and similarly felt as if hard throttle from off the line wasn't as tight or jumpy as before. This could of course be my imagination, or it could be the result of using fresh fluid over something that was ~30k old but had ~12-15k of towing on it, perhaps. I tried running the gears out (e.g. holding 2nd to ~45 and then manually allowing 3rd) and again it felt like the shifts were slow and soft. I also noticed what sounds like a slight high-pitched whine when I was holding 2nd at 40-45mph but the pitch changed after shifting. My initial thought was transmission whine, though I'm pretty sure they just used bulk 75 or 80W gear oil in the transfer case (not 75W LF) so perhaps that's related

I called the dealer and the service manager said he spoke to the mechanic to confirm but that "00279-00ATF is just their internal code for bulk ATF WS fluid and we only use WS in these transmissions". He said they avoid the 00289-ATFWS part unless they're just topping off and someone requests it because the single quart bottles are more expensive.

The service manager has always been pleasant and helpful. He said "if you think something doesn't feel right, bring it back and we'll take a look". I set up time Friday morning for them to check it out.

What I'm wondering is:
  1. Aside from sending an oil sample off for analysis, is there any way to tell what's in the transmission right now? I understand T-IV is heavier than ATF WS but is it easy to extract a few tablespoons and confirm the fluid, or is there no easy way to differentiate?
  2. Has anyone else in the group has any experience with using the non-synthetic T-IV fluid in their transmission, or has very similar experience with a fluid change like this? I'm wondering if my experience with shifting and/or slight noise is indicative of the wrong fluid, or if I'm just insane (which is entirely possible)
  3. If they did use T-IV, any serious/lasting damage after ~30 miles? (I'm thinking not, but figured I'd ask).
 
I also wonder about fluid level.

Personally them showing me their part number listing and how that might be different for bulk/bottle T4 would go a long way. If the number they listed turns out to be identified as their bulk WS somewhere in the place.. supports their story.

You could always pull a sample and keep it for future evidence in the event of problems. Or send it off.. the viscosity of WS is much lower so should be easy for someone with the right equipment to tell which it is.
 
I also wonder about fluid level.

Personally them showing me their part number listing and how that might be different for bulk/bottle T4 would go a long way. If the number they listed turns out to be identified as their bulk WS somewhere in the place.. supports their story.

You could always pull a sample and keep it for future evidence in the event of problems. Or send it off.. the viscosity of WS is much lower so should be easy for someone with the right equipment to tell which it is.
Whether they used the right or wrong fluid, I suppose they could always argue "mechanic used the right fluid but accidentally undercharged you by punching in the wrong part when updating the work". Or they could claim to do another fluid swap with the ATF WS part # and then actually do nothing but hope that it's purely mental. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I may pull a sample if they are steadfast in their "it's correct" explanation.
 
It will be stupid move for a toyota tech to use T4 fluid to flush the transmission. Toyota switched to WS since 2008. It will be a bad move to fill transmission that use WS with T4. Since it's dealer serviced, I'll bring back to dealer. If there is any damage caused by wrong fluid, they will need to cover the damages. Also, Dealer don't use bottle for fluid exchange. They have drums of WS fluid. So, I won't worry about the part no. listed on service invoice.
 
It will be stupid move for a toyota tech to use T4 fluid to flush the transmission. Toyota switched to WS since 2008. It will be a bad move to fill transmission that use WS with T4. Since it's dealer serviced, I'll bring back to dealer. If there is any damage caused by wrong fluid, they will need to cover the damages. Also, Dealer don't use bottle for fluid exchange. They have drums of WS fluid. So, I won't worry about the part no. listed on service invoice.
Yeah I agree it would be stupid. But mistakes do happen.
 
Aside from dropping the skid checking fluid level is darn easy since you have the OBDII tools. Just monitor your trans temp up to the set temp on a cold start, and open the fluid level port. Even with dropping the skid it's 30 min or less. Probably could take the skid off while the truck is warming up . . .
 
You are so tuned into your cruiser that I’m convinced either the level or type of fluid is wrong.
 
FWIW Toyota changed to WS fluid in 2004 on the Cruiser. The 2003 and 2004 share identical transmission with identical BoM’s.
 
FWIW Toyota changed to WS fluid in 2004 on the Cruiser. The 2003 and 2004 share identical transmission with identical BoM’s.
Interesting.

I suspect in that case the older transmissions operated fine with the newer semi-synthetic fluid. I’m wondering if the inverse is necessarily true though?
 
Interesting.

I suspect in that case the older transmissions operated fine with the newer semi-synthetic fluid. I’m wondering if the inverse is necessarily true though?
You and I sound aligned on being highly adept to how our trucks drive.

If you’re like me, I won’t sleep until I knew for sure I had WS in there and double and triple checked per the correct thermal testing procedure.
 
You and I sound aligned on being highly adept to how our trucks drive.

If you’re like me, I won’t sleep until I knew for sure I had WS in there and double and triple checked per the correct thermal testing procedure.
I’m not going anywhere until Friday so at the moment I’ll sleep just fine. ;). But yeah, for as much heavy driving as I do I won’t be happy until it’s right.

I may try to check it myself but my garage floor is incredibly un-level, so I need to find a flat parking lot somewhere if I do it myself… hence why I just payed the dealer to do it initially (and why my garage is about to be demolished and replaced)
 
When I looked into doing the transmission fluid flush of the 4Runner, I found out the certified shop used 'alternative or equivalent' fluids at times. Ended up sourcing the correct ATF WS fluid myself (along with the OEM diff gear oil GL-5 75W-85 and Transfer Gear oil LF 75W), and spent the day observing the mechanic doing the swap procedure.

Driving off felt like a night and day improvement. Center/ rear diff locks were quick, shifts felt more crisp, and off the line reaction started slightly earlier in the rev range and felt almost like driving with a new clutch vs a slightly-slipping older clutch with the worn out fluid.

I'm expecting the same impressions with the LC200 after a fresh swap. Anything less could be a sign something wasn't done right.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom