greynolds
SILVER Star
Sean04100 said:I'm not worried about Toyota not covering it, the only reason I think it probably isn't sold in North America as a dealer option, is because , there isn't a big market for it here, same reason they don't offer a turbo diesel or a 105. The few Landcruisers that come to the US are marketed as fully loaded luxury vehicles. Not the case in other parts of the world like Australia where they sell far more Landcruisers
The way I see it is Toyota designed theyre brackets and bullbar to work at the same crush rate as the cheap bumper, they have crash tested it, unless gravity is different in the Southern hemisphere a crush rate is a crush rate. That and the fact that I haven't seen anything stateing "not for use in North America" or "for offroad use only".
Well, gravity works in the opposite direction in the southern hemisphere because it still has to pull the item in the opposite direction in order to hit the ground.

On a serious note though, if you honestly think that Toyota would actually cover damages incurred to your vehicle or (more importantly) people in any way related to installing something that they don't sell in this market, I really think you'd get a serious reality check before you'd get a dime out of them. If you're even remotely concerned that you may some day have an accident that might be air bag related, you'd really be well advised to at least try to get something in writing from Toyota that they stand behind the bumper in this market. Toyota North America has a very easy out in the event that there is serious injury or death that could be attributed to the bumper you're installing that they don't import into this market, Toyota Genuine Part or not. Another factor is whether the bumper is DOT approved or not - it obviously isn't given that Toyota doesn't officially import it to the US (the ARB and TJM bumpers probably are either).
So perhaps I spent $300 to $400 more than I would have with an ARB or TJM , but I think it's defintely worth it.
Here is a pic from autotrader.com.au with the bar.
The bottom line is whether you're happy with your choice or not - I don't think any of us are trying to be negative in that regard. We're just trying to point out what we feel are obvious and potentially serious flaws in your assumptions in regards to how Toyota would treat you on a claim if the need arose. The ramifications of a faulty assumption on your part could potentially ruin you financially if there was a serious injury or death that was attributed in any way to the bumper. Worst case in trying to get Toyota to give you something in writing is that they'll refuse to do so. Best case is you'll have some peace of mind - and prove us all wrong
