Should I consider a 100 Series for a Kid Hauler? (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Mar 30, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
6
Location
Oklahoma
I'll preface this saying I have been searching and reading around the forums a lot over the past several weeks. Some of this is me just wanting to put some thoughts and notes down. Feedback and discussion around it is a welcome bonus too. :)

Currently I have a '13 Tacoma Double Cab. Our youngest of 3 kids is 3 now. It's been challenging working around it but also with more reduced driving the last few years didn't feel a huge need to go buy a vehicle during the height of market craze. The oldest is about the size of a small adult so we have managed pretty well with the 4 of us. When all 5 have needed to take the Tacoma, it's painful before we ever leave. Immediately prior to the Tacoma, I had an '03 4Runner v8 RWD for about 5 years and have owned a Toyota for most of the past 20 years. Loved that 4Runner but the lack of 4WD did show up a few times to bite me. I don't have any big off-roading needs but it's nice to not get stuck even in mild conditions. It was a compromise made when we bought it and just couldn't hold out to find one in the budget with 4WD. Even before the last kid expansion I had looked at mostly European crossovers and that started when VW had the TDI fix. Did like the 958 Cayenne and the late first gen Q7s, but ultimately was scared away from all the TDI problems I read about. The gas engine options in each were also nice, but also not vehicles I wanted to really be able to hold onto long term. Came close particularly on one of each that the deals just didn't work out.

Few weeks ago I really started considering finding a 100 or 200 Series. I do find it would be easily possible to get a cheaper, earlier model while keeping the Tacoma. It's not really until the mid-years of the 200 Series that I think it would make sense to part with the Tacoma right away. The early 200 Series are priced pretty evenly with late 100 Series. I do have a higher comfort level with the 4.7 and perhaps a bit less of the electronics and other high-cost systems. Though a lot of the research leads me to the fact that the newer ones are going to behave and feel more comfortable on road. Considering what other vehicles I was looking at and knowing they were also going to have some higher maintence and replacement costs, I am ok with that. I'm not really considering a 5th gen 4Runner as don't care too much for the design and interior of them. Finding a v8 4WD 4th gen that is an overall good vehicle also seems to be a bit more of a needle in a haystack these days and comparable in prices with other options while maintaining some of the quirks and shortcomings.

Hoping to be able to find a few different models to test drive and take an in-person look at soon to really get a feel of each.
 
Been hauling 3 kids for years in a 60, then 80, then 100. I will say, once they get into teen years, the love of the 3rd row dies fast with very little leg room. As for which model, buy the newest LC you can afford.
 
Hauled around four kids in a couple 80 series’ and 100 series’. Totaled one hundy with all four kids safe and sound.

Well beyond satisfied with safety, comfort, reliability, onroad/offroad versatility and low cost of ownership in all eight hundys I’ve owned.

Never had a 2hundy to compare.
 
I’d go 200 series for that use case.
 
The 200 is no better than the 100 at kid hauling but the highway performance is indeed better... as is added safety features. A 2008+ Sequoia could also be in the running if mild off-road is all you need and more space is what you want.
 
The gas mileage and maintenance is better on the 200.
 
03 and up was my requirement for my ''daughter-mobile' when I bought because of the availability of side airbags. It worked wonderfully for kid hauling and usefulness. We always had friends coming home with us and our 100 had plenty of space and ability to go and park anywhere. Still have it and its our hauler for almost everything we do. Wife has a Cayenne and she loves it - but my 245K mile cruiser gets the nod for most of our family needs.
 
I too bought my 100 as my "daughter-mobile" and family adventure vehicle.

I love my 9th gen 5spd Corolla, but for obvious reasons we weren't thrilled with it for hauling kids around. (still have it though)

My daughter is still in a carseat, that we've placed in the middle of the back row - the Cruiser is her fortress. Besides the slight hassle of getting her in / out in that position, it's been fantastic. With the third row removed we can bring as much gear as we've ever wanted on our trips.

Of course a number of vehicles can match the 100 on space, but not so many match it on reliability / capability. Plus, I really enjoy working on it since I got it.

That said, kids or not, at this point I'd never suggest a 100 to someone who isn't going to DIY at least some, ideally most of the maintenance & repairs.
 
If you're in OK and not offroading with this car why are you considering a land cruiser at all? They have atrocious gas mileage, cost a fortune to maintain and are not fun to drive as a daily. Get an AWD Sienna. I am not even joking. Land Cruisers IMO should be purpose built, never understood daily driving one. Too sloppy and heavy IMO, just not fun and also filling up $100 every 200-250 miles is not fun.
 
Some of the early 100 series don't have the clips in the seats for car seats. I use the seatbelt and one of these tensioners to keep the car seat tight on the passenger side. Driver side has the anchors to attach the car seat. Otherwise the 100 series is great for my 2 kids. I'd recommend the newest you can get though like others have said

Capture.PNG
 
If you're in OK and not offroading with this car why are you considering a land cruiser at all? They have atrocious gas mileage, cost a fortune to maintain and are not fun to drive as a daily. Get an AWD Sienna. I am not even joking. Land Cruisers IMO should be purpose built, never understood daily driving one. Too sloppy and heavy IMO, just not fun and also filling up $100 every 200-250 miles is not fun.

Not everyone wheels the crap out of their rigs. Plenty keep them stock, and maintain them to last as long as possible. IMO this makes the most sense for a LC - especially for a low(ish) mile, recent year model.

Keep it stock and throw some Defenders on. Super comfortable on road and can also get you to most reasonable remote locations in all conditions. You will get the EPA rated 17 highway as long as you don't drive like your in a hurry.

Grab a cheaper higher mileage, older one to modify and beat up. MPG and ride quality will suffer.
 
I drive an 07 100 series and my wife drives a 2015 LX570. Both are great dailies for our two young kids (5 & 7). If we had three, I'd defer to the LX due to the electric 3rd row and being able to raise and lower it as needed. Honestly, the LX will probably become my daily in a few years when it's time to upgrade the wife's ride and the 100 will become the special use and project vehicle. The LX is fantastic as a family vehicle. Safe and pretty much bulletproof reliable.
 
My 2001 has three car seats in the back. Lifted and 34's. Its a great daily in the fact that I know it'll never leave me stranded, but its not great in the fact that i get about 12.5 mpg.

Only two of the back seats have LATCH anchors, but my oldest cant use them anyway so it works out for me.

However, I also have a 2016 Tundra. That is way more comfortable, better on gas, and tons more storage than the 100 and definitely the Taco.

You should look at switching to one of those too if you are trading the Taco. The back seat of a Crewmax tundra is like a living room.
 
My $0.02...I bought my 05' LX back in December not knowing anything about this platform...fast forward to now and I enjoy driving it EVERY time I jump in it. I have 5 kids ranging from 7 y/o to 16 y/o and all 7 of us fit comfortably in there. It's hard to point to 1 thing, but the 100 series to me is the perfect blend of old and new, a bit of a throwback to analog driving, but the newer creature comforts. For reference, our other vehicle is my wife's Tesla Model Y, so she hates the LX (not enough electronics for her)...which secretly makes me love it more! lol
 
If you're in OK and not offroading with this car why are you considering a land cruiser at all? They have atrocious gas mileage, cost a fortune to maintain and are not fun to drive as a daily. Get an AWD Sienna. I am not even joking. Land Cruisers IMO should be purpose built, never understood daily driving one. Too sloppy and heavy IMO, just not fun and also filling up $100 every 200-250 miles is not fun.
Pretty much totally disagree. The 100 series is more likely to get a pile of kids from point A to B to Z than anything else…onroad as well as normal offroad traversing.

Atrocious gas mileage depends on what you’re comparing to. If you are OK being a prisoner to the pavement, not being able to cross a grass median or teeter tottering on a concrete median then you may can use the more fuel costs as a negative.

Fortune to maintain?? You choose to spend that unnecessary fortune or bought the only lemon on the planet.

Too sloppy? Tighten your wheel bearings and replace bushings.

Heavy? Correct and good reason to haul your kids in it. When the guy runs the red light and T bones your family, do you want to be in a light and lower van dragging the ground or a higher heavier beast for protection??

Should be purpose built?? They are… purposely built to do anything you need and go anywhere you want to go. Purposely built to be extremely reliable. Purposely built to be extremely durable and purposely built to be overbuilt for those that don’t want anything less.

Not fun to drive as a daily?? You might should own one.
 
Last edited:
I grew up in a 100 Series, my father bought one when I was 9. I'm 33. and now my first child (due any day now) is going to grow up in one. Despite the age, and all things associated with 100's (heavy maintenance, economy, dated tech), these are some of the greatest SUV's in the world.
I wouldn't hesitate, and I'm not hesitating, to put my family in a 100 Series.
 
My $0.02...I bought my 05' LX back in December not knowing anything about this platform...fast forward to now and I enjoy driving it EVERY time I jump in it. I have 5 kids ranging from 7 y/o to 16 y/o and all 7 of us fit comfortably in there. It's hard to point to 1 thing, but the 100 series to me is the perfect blend of old and new, a bit of a throwback to analog driving, but the newer creature comforts. For reference, our other vehicle is my wife's Tesla Model Y, so she hates the LX (not enough electronics for her)...which secretly makes me love it more! lol

Talk about yin and yang 😆
 
We bought our 100 in 2004 (while the 100 was still in production, lol). It has served as my wife's daily and ferried our 3 year old (now 23!) and his mom and dad to mid atlantic beaches, mountains, vacations/road trips, travel soccer, virginia tech, and all places in between since then. It is the best most reliable car in our fleet and we are blessed to have it as part of the family. No regrets whatsoever.
 
Thanks for all the feedback so far. It’s far more than I anticipated. Been reading it all even if I haven’t replied yet! I’ll try to sit down tomorrow to respond to some of them.
 
The 200 is no better than the 100 at kid hauling but the highway performance is indeed better... as is added safety features. A 2008+ Sequoia could also be in the running if mild off-road is all you need and more space is what you want.

I haven't looked at a Sequoia since I was shopping for the 4Runner, and even then it was an early first generation. I'll take a look.

I too bought my 100 as my "daughter-mobile" and family adventure vehicle.

I love my 9th gen 5spd Corolla, but for obvious reasons we weren't thrilled with it for hauling kids around. (still have it though)

My daughter is still in a carseat, that we've placed in the middle of the back row - the Cruiser is her fortress. Besides the slight hassle of getting her in / out in that position, it's been fantastic. With the third row removed we can bring as much gear as we've ever wanted on our trips.

Of course a number of vehicles can match the 100 on space, but not so many match it on reliability / capability. Plus, I really enjoy working on it since I got it.

That said, kids or not, at this point I'd never suggest a 100 to someone who isn't going to DIY at least some, ideally most of the maintenance & repairs.

I think at this point in time with the way parts and labor has gone, pretty good advice for anybody to try to do what they can themselves. I'm pretty comfortable with a lot of maintenance and repairs.

If you're in OK and not offroading with this car why are you considering a land cruiser at all? They have atrocious gas mileage, cost a fortune to maintain and are not fun to drive as a daily. Get an AWD Sienna. I am not even joking. Land Cruisers IMO should be purpose built, never understood daily driving one. Too sloppy and heavy IMO, just not fun and also filling up $100 every 200-250 miles is not fun.

I don't get great fuel economy on the Tacoma as it is. That did likely come down to a factory package that added a front lift and BFGs. In fact if I could get anything close to the rated highway milage, it would be an improvement most of the time. If I really needed to maximize fuel economy I'd be looking at electric or hybrid vehicles anyway. Considering what else I was looking at though, the cost of maintenance isn't as much of a concern either. It wasn't the maintenance costs that made me second guess those. It primarily came down to not trusting direct injection long term, as well as knowing they would continue to depreciate into nothing.

A previous job did use minivans, although no Siennas, as part of our fleet vehicles. Anytime I had to drive one it was horrible experience. I even preferred the 15 passenger vans over them. I also certainly don't know if the ~6.5" of ground clearance on that AWD Sienna is going to cut it. I didn't say I don't go off-road at all. I'm off the pavement pretty frequently, but I wouldn't be planning to build this for off-roading. There would likely be some better choices for that than a 100 series for me if that was the case.

My 2001 has three car seats in the back. Lifted and 34's. Its a great daily in the fact that I know it'll never leave me stranded, but its not great in the fact that i get about 12.5 mpg.

Only two of the back seats have LATCH anchors, but my oldest cant use them anyway so it works out for me.

However, I also have a 2016 Tundra. That is way more comfortable, better on gas, and tons more storage than the 100 and definitely the Taco.

You should look at switching to one of those too if you are trading the Taco. The back seat of a Crewmax tundra is like a living room.

I have not looked specifically at any Tundras. I did look at a few other full-size trucks. The increase in interior space is nice, and any bit of extra bed length helps when it's needed. The problem came down to not being able to easily fit into the garage. They'll fit but the compromise would be having to open up the garage door every single time somebody needed to walk around it to the other side of the garage.

My $0.02...I bought my 05' LX back in December not knowing anything about this platform...fast forward to now and I enjoy driving it EVERY time I jump in it. I have 5 kids ranging from 7 y/o to 16 y/o and all 7 of us fit comfortably in there. It's hard to point to 1 thing, but the 100 series to me is the perfect blend of old and new, a bit of a throwback to analog driving, but the newer creature comforts. For reference, our other vehicle is my wife's Tesla Model Y, so she hates the LX (not enough electronics for her)...which secretly makes me love it more! lol

This is largely what draws me in as well, and good to know it can fit up to 7 comfortably. I don't foresee us needing to that all the time, or for very long distances. But it would certainly make some things easier dealing with all the kids friends all the time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom