First let me say how great of a resource this forum has been. The depth and breadth of the knowledge posted here has been incredibly helpful. (I don't even own a 100 series, yet I am already addicted to the site. I think I've viewed every post related to what year to get, 4 vs 5-speed transmissions, AHC, and cost of ownership.) Anyway, as you can see from the title of this post I am looking for some guidance and would hope that you'd be willing to offer advice based on your own purchase and ownership experiences.
I am looking to purchase an LC or LX470 that will serve as my wife's daily driver and our primary road trip vehicle. We live in Denver and love exploring Colorado (now that our two kids are old enough, we want to do a lot more of it). Based on what I've learned from the forum, I'm focusing my search on 2000+ model years due to the traction control. And while I'd ideally go with a 2003+ to get the 5-speed, I'd consider a 2000-2002 if it had the right combo of price, mileage, and maintenance history. Goal is to spend under 20k.
Which brings me to my question. Knowing what you know now, if you were buying (and financing) your 100 series for the first time, would you spend more (20k) to get a lower mileage 03+, or spend much less (<13) and get a well maintained 2000-2002 with 150k (still low by many standards) on the clock? I'm not looking to make any serious modifications and am planning on owning the vehicle for at least 5 years, hopefully more.
Any insight is very much appreciated.
I am looking to purchase an LC or LX470 that will serve as my wife's daily driver and our primary road trip vehicle. We live in Denver and love exploring Colorado (now that our two kids are old enough, we want to do a lot more of it). Based on what I've learned from the forum, I'm focusing my search on 2000+ model years due to the traction control. And while I'd ideally go with a 2003+ to get the 5-speed, I'd consider a 2000-2002 if it had the right combo of price, mileage, and maintenance history. Goal is to spend under 20k.
Which brings me to my question. Knowing what you know now, if you were buying (and financing) your 100 series for the first time, would you spend more (20k) to get a lower mileage 03+, or spend much less (<13) and get a well maintained 2000-2002 with 150k (still low by many standards) on the clock? I'm not looking to make any serious modifications and am planning on owning the vehicle for at least 5 years, hopefully more.
Any insight is very much appreciated.