I have been working with Cruiser804 to create the many designs that have fueled this discussion. I would like to make an observation if I may. When I made a simple design, it was "cheesey", and when I made a complex design it was "busy". I am happy to help you guys come up with a logo that you would be proud to have represent your club but I think that if we continue in this way we will always be reacting to suggesttions and not achieving goals. To answer your question Stumbaugh, I can do that, but I think we need to stop and evaluate the process for a minute.
First off, does anyone know the year that CLCC was formed, I just guessed at 1992? I think it is important to incorporate the Est. in whatever logo you end up with.
Secondly, is there a consensus as to what best represents your group, clean and simple (my preference hence the first submissions), slick and cool guy (STLCA) or complex and heavy on DC area pride (the most recent) ?
And lastly, Is there any one person in the group with the authority to choose from say three options, if I were to work up one for each of the camps of interest that are voicing their opinions?
I hope we can work this out, it has been fun addressing the multitude of preferences.
Let me know,
Spike