My 13 Starfire Pearl LX570 definitely looks better than it’s comparable model year LC from the front AND especially the rear. The Land Cruiser looks like a very nice Toyota. The LX fits in with the luxury SUV crowd without being overly flashy. The wheels on the LX are much nicer. The ride on road is nicer with the AHC. The interior materials are of higher quality and there’s totally no comparison of the vastly inferior JBL sound system in the LC to the Mark Levinson Reference audio the LX has.
Resale value is moot. The wealthy aren’t paying cash for these trucks brand new with a 25 year service life to wonder how much they’ll be able to sell it for 10-20 years later.
If you’re spending 90k, the LX offers the same off-roading abilities as the LC while giving you much more for your money. In the used market, the LX is the no brainer choice considering they are slightly less than the LC.
And yes, the LX is a very capable off-roader as well:
Wheels? Personal taste. AHC and electronic shocks? When has anyone complained about LC ride? None. But there are threads here that complain about LX ride...just one this morning. AHC leaks...isn't that the first thing anyone says when someone complains about LX ride? Electronic shocks cost over $1k to replace.
Interior...oh yeah, LX is much better!! Fake wood in LC is an abomination!
As for JBL being "vastly" inferior...i agree that it is lesser unit...but vastly? That's stretching it. I wrote on the ML system pros recently...ML is better in clarity and tonality throughout due to same combo of speakers in all its surround.
But on modern LX, you have to deal with the mouse....so.....
Wealthy don't care about resale? Hmmm, why are there so many LX on sale on the USED market? Because MOST wealthy folks keep their cars for a few years (3-5 years) and move on when the new model comes out or when other brands offer something flashier...NO MATTER service life of a vehicle. MOST owners of LC/LX are NOT on this forum. Service life is irrelevant to 99% of LX owners.
Same off-road capability? True. But there are limitations that affect how much damage you're willing to incur off-road. How about angles? How about articulation when you're jacked up?
Much more value if you are looking to buy used? I agree 100%. But why is resale value significantly better on LC and bad on LX? There must be a reason for that, right? IF more people want the flashy look and luxury and more for your money, then wouldn't LX on used market fetch more because of more demand? IF LC has poor sales (it does), then why such high resale? Name me one other car that has piss poor sales yet has excellent (nearly iconic) resale value? I cannot.
While that video is cool...how much $$$$$ went into that truck to make it THAT capable? The same (and probably less $$$$) can be done on LC too. Take a stock LX and stock LC out off-roading. Which will come back with more battle scars and needing more bodywork done? Which will cost more down the road to maintain (fuel, maintenance, parts) if you take it off-road or make mods?