- Thread starter
- #21
My wife and I went through many of the same decisions picking our 2001 - and compared to similar vehicles you listed. We've got 2 toddlers, a camper to pull, are planning a driving trip to Alaska, and haven't been wheeling since having kids. Here were some of our comparision points:
Does built on a frame matter to you? It did to us for pulling the camper.
Why didn't we pick an 80? The V8 of the 100 was appealing for the power and torque.
Wanted a 2000 or newer to get the VSC (our winters are snowy). Wanted a 2001 or newer to get the LATCH for the kid's seats. The 2003 or newer has the 5-speed tranny, but it went out of our price range.
Why didn't we pick a 4runner? Wanted more room to pack for vacations (had several recommendations that the 4runner with a family would get cramped). Also, the Liberty is small, and the Grand Cheroke has surprisingly not much room - for what we wanted.
We also looked at a Range and a Disco, but Land Rover's reliability (lack of) held too much weight in the decision against them.
Yes, fuel cost is a shortcoming. But I figured at 17k miles per year, and if I sold our 3rd vehicle, we'd save more in not carrying the insurance compared to the additional cost of fueling up the Landcruiser. And with that, I could take my wife out for dinner a few more times per year (good selling point!).
Hope this gives you a few more things to consider.
great stuff, thanks!

-grand cherokee is out cuz i don't like them and the build quality sucks
-went and test drove the 100 again yesterday...wow, is all i could say
-thought about a 4runner overnight and it may end up being an option, but...
-i'm also considering 80's now (you have this dang forum to thank for that..lol..don't blame me)
thats all.

p.s. series landrovers have a place in my heart, but i'd NEVER buy a disco. what a CRAPPY platform.