First Land Cruiser After Four 4Runners — Here’s What I Think (7 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jul 26, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
2
Location
Colorado
New member here, so I just wanted to introduce myself and share some thoughts as a new LC250 owner. I’ve spent most of my life in 4Runners (1997, 2001, 2007, and 2017), and while I’ve always admired Land Cruisers, this is the first one I’ve owned. After spending a few weeks with it, I’m honestly surprised by how much negativity I’ve seen online about this generation. I figured I'd give my take, especially coming from the 4Runner side.

I learned to drive in a stick shift 3rd gen 4Runner and took it camping, skiing, on road trips, and more. It had character and was fun to drive. My 2007 was fine, but it felt more like a family car and lost some of that rugged feel. I bought a brand-new 2017 Off Road Premium thinking it would be the best of both worlds, but it just didn’t live up to the hype. It felt sluggish and constantly hunted for gears in the mountains. Ride quality wasn’t great for a growing family, and even though I loved the look and capability, it always felt like a compromise.

Enter the new Land Cruiser. For me, it’s exactly what I hoped the 5th gen 4Runner would be. It’s quicker, smoother, and more refined, but still feels like a proper truck. I know a lot of people are bashing the turbo 4-cylinder hybrid, but it pulls better than my old V6, gets better mileage, and doesn’t feel underpowered at all. The interior is well thought out with real buttons and knobs, not a touchscreen overload. It feels rugged, but well built, and most importantly, it doesn’t feel cheap.

The ride is lightyears ahead of my old 4Runner. It’s still body-on-frame and full-time 4WD, so it has the bones. Rear locker, center diff lock, sway bar disconnect, and low range. That’s more than enough for the kind of off-roading I actually do these days. Sure, it doesn’t have a front locker, but I haven’t needed one yet. I’m sure the aftermarket will have solutions soon enough.

I’ve seen a lot of comments from people saying “this isn’t a real Land Cruiser” or “Toyota ruined it.” I get that people are attached to the 80s and 100s. I respect those trucks. They’re amazing. But realistically, the 200 was the last of the overbuilt luxury tanks and barely anyone bought them in the U.S. Toyota isn’t a charity. They have to build something that will sell, and I think they nailed it with this.

A few things people criticize that I actually think Toyota handled well:

  • Powertrain: I’d rather have a torquey, efficient hybrid than a thirsty V8 in today’s market.
  • Solid axle: I get the nostalgia, but this thing flexes great with the sway bar disconnect and rides way better on the road. Even Jeep is moving away from them in some models.
  • Tech: I was worried about all the driver assists, but most of them can be turned off. And unlike the fake 4WD shifter in my old 4Runner, the 4WD selector in this actually makes sense.
  • Price: Yeah, it’s not cheap. But compared to what else is out there for this mix of capability, comfort, and reliability, I think it’s fair. I know some dealerships are marking these up over MSRP, but my dealership didn’t, and I got them to throw in some extras for free.
I know this platform isn’t for everyone. But for someone like me who’s been around Toyota trucks for decades, wants something capable but comfortable, and doesn’t want to wrench on a 25-year-old rig, I think the new LC is the right move.

Looking forward to learning more here, seeing what people are doing with theirs, and hopefully getting back into a little light trail use when time allows.
 
I tend to agree with your entire post. I owned a 1997 80 series and loved it. I have a 250 FE. This is better unless you are making it a designated off road rig. Even then, I doubt an equally built 250 wouldn't be able to keep up with an 80.

I think the angst is b/c people didn't get what they wanted and can't get a 300. To be fair, if the 300 were offered in the US in a Toyota name-badge, I'd probably buy it instead. However, the Prado does everything I want and then some.
 
Last edited:
New member here, so I just wanted to introduce myself and share some thoughts as a new LC250 owner. I’ve spent most of my life in 4Runners (1997, 2001, 2007, and 2017), and while I’ve always admired Land Cruisers, this is the first one I’ve owned. After spending a few weeks with it, I’m honestly surprised by how much negativity I’ve seen online about this generation. I figured I'd give my take, especially coming from the 4Runner side.

I learned to drive in a stick shift 3rd gen 4Runner and took it camping, skiing, on road trips, and more. It had character and was fun to drive. My 2007 was fine, but it felt more like a family car and lost some of that rugged feel. I bought a brand-new 2017 Off Road Premium thinking it would be the best of both worlds, but it just didn’t live up to the hype. It felt sluggish and constantly hunted for gears in the mountains. Ride quality wasn’t great for a growing family, and even though I loved the look and capability, it always felt like a compromise.

Enter the new Land Cruiser. For me, it’s exactly what I hoped the 5th gen 4Runner would be. It’s quicker, smoother, and more refined, but still feels like a proper truck. I know a lot of people are bashing the turbo 4-cylinder hybrid, but it pulls better than my old V6, gets better mileage, and doesn’t feel underpowered at all. The interior is well thought out with real buttons and knobs, not a touchscreen overload. It feels rugged, but well built, and most importantly, it doesn’t feel cheap.

The ride is lightyears ahead of my old 4Runner. It’s still body-on-frame and full-time 4WD, so it has the bones. Rear locker, center diff lock, sway bar disconnect, and low range. That’s more than enough for the kind of off-roading I actually do these days. Sure, it doesn’t have a front locker, but I haven’t needed one yet. I’m sure the aftermarket will have solutions soon enough.

I’ve seen a lot of comments from people saying “this isn’t a real Land Cruiser” or “Toyota ruined it.” I get that people are attached to the 80s and 100s. I respect those trucks. They’re amazing. But realistically, the 200 was the last of the overbuilt luxury tanks and barely anyone bought them in the U.S. Toyota isn’t a charity. They have to build something that will sell, and I think they nailed it with this.

A few things people criticize that I actually think Toyota handled well:

  • Powertrain: I’d rather have a torquey, efficient hybrid than a thirsty V8 in today’s market.
  • Solid axle: I get the nostalgia, but this thing flexes great with the sway bar disconnect and rides way better on the road. Even Jeep is moving away from them in some models.
  • Tech: I was worried about all the driver assists, but most of them can be turned off. And unlike the fake 4WD shifter in my old 4Runner, the 4WD selector in this actually makes sense.
  • Price: Yeah, it’s not cheap. But compared to what else is out there for this mix of capability, comfort, and reliability, I think it’s fair. I know some dealerships are marking these up over MSRP, but my dealership didn’t, and I got them to throw in some extras for free.
I know this platform isn’t for everyone. But for someone like me who’s been around Toyota trucks for decades, wants something capable but comfortable, and doesn’t want to wrench on a 25-year-old rig, I think the new LC is the right move.

Looking forward to learning more here, seeing what people are doing with theirs, and hopefully getting back into a little light trail use when time allows.
Fully agree
The wife and I test drove a 2024 LX600 v6 (base model), The Landcruiser 250 has a better interior, better road manners and powertrain, I was sadly unimpressed by the $98k LX. Wife ended up buying a GLS (her choice), I bought a 2025 LC250 Premium, sold my 1997 1FZFE 80 Series. Loved the 80 series but don't miss it, thought i couldn't live life without a tailgate but i was wrong.

1982 4x4 Toyota Pickup, loved it
1987 4runner, loved it
2017 Tacoma TRD off-road, that V6 was horrible on long drives and in town, did not love that truck.
1997 80 Series 10.9 mpg, loved it somewhat...
Always wanted a 5th gen 4runner never bought one, they should have all came with a v8
2025 Land Cruiser aka Landcruiser Prado, Love it!!!

Its so funny seeing the wannabe oligarch 200 series owners, claiming the new Land Cruiser 250 "doesn't live up to the Landcruiser name" 🤣 They are constantly trolling the LC250 FB pages and forums. Don't make it so obvious you have no life and need justification to remain relevant.
  1. Your 200 series might be luxurious by 1995 standards, Landcruiser was never a "luxury vehicle" until the introduction of the 200 series. How many were sold in the USA? They didn't sell because they weren't up to USA "luxury standards" the average toyota person couldn't afford them and people with money wanted more luxury, sure in a 3rd world they are the king of luxury.
  2. The Luxury version of the Land Cruiser is the Lexus version.
  3. Landcruiser only had v8 in usa from 1998-2017 (Excluding the LX and GX). Dating back to 1958 the landcruiser has been powered by inline 6 and 4 cylinder (all underpowered)
  4. The Prado is sold under the Landcruiser name, hence the name "Land Cruiser ~ Prado"
 
They are solid. Hope you enjoy yours. I absolutely love my J150 GX. Wheels like a champ.
 
Yep a 250 is a great upgrade from a 5th gen runner.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing your impressions of the 250.
My GX470 has 320,000 miles, so I occasionally wonder what I'll get next. The reliability of the 5th gen 4Runner makes it attractive, but your comments make me appreciate the ride and power of the 470 even more.

In chronological order, I've daily driven an 80, a 62, and a 3rd gen 4Runner. I've had this 470 since 2019 and believe it is Goldilocks. I'm glad to hear that you're enjoying Toyota's latest current version of the platform.
 
I'm curious, did you cross shop the 6th gen 4Runner? If so, why did you choose the Land Cruiser?
 
I'm curious, did you cross shop the 6th gen 4Runner? If so, why did you choose the Land Cruiser?
I did. The 6th gen 4Runner is great, and the new hybrid iForce Max engine addressed my complaints about the 5th gen. My biggest issue with the 6th gen 4Runner, though, has nothing to do with performance... I thought the 5th gen 4Runner was one of the coolest-looking SUVs on the market, and the 6th gen just doesn't do it for me. I didn't write off the 6th gen because of that, but it did lead me to test drive the Land Cruiser in addition to the new 4Runner, and for me, the Land Cruiser was just the better car.
You did buy a 4Runner - with a Land Cruiser badge on it. 😉
I know what you mean by this, but having test-driven both of them, I think there are enough differences to justify having both in Toyota's lineup. Honestly, if I were buying a car 10 years ago, before I had a family, I probably would have gone with the 6th gen 4Runner. But now I don't get out wheeling as much as I used to, and my car is used for shuttling my kids around most of the time. I'm not willing to shut the door on that part of my life, and I hope my kids will enjoy off-roading and exploring in the mountains with me as they get older. But for now, the new Land Cruiser hits a sweet spot for me as a nicer, wife-approved family car that still feels rugged and will likely get me anywhere I need to go, especially if I start modding it further down the road.
 
Just wait until OP finds out the 250 has lighter running gear than the 6th gen 4Runner off road trims, while being sold at a higher price. Thanks Toyota :)
If people were roasting diffs left and right then sure that’s a concern but until then get a life clown.
 
1 new Tacoma built in Mexico blew a cv. Gotcha so no substantial data. 📊
The fix was for them to limit the amount of torque being able to be put down as to not shock the drivetrain and snap it. If they had heavier duty components shared with the 300, it likely would have not been an issue.
 
The fix was for them to limit the amount of torque being able to be put down as to not shock the drivetrain and snap it. If they had heavier duty components shared with the 300, it likely would have not been an issue.
Hearsay. 4wd247 has broken a dozen cv axles on 200s. Should we base our opinions on 200s entirely off of that?
 
Hearsay. 4wd247 has broken a dozen cv axles on 200s. Should we base our opinions on 200s entirely off of that?
Not necessarily, but the 200 CV’s are exponentially stronger than the 250’s, and if those are breaking, then they are really nerfing the power output on the 250 (which has a higher peak torque rating on paper, why would they put weaker running gear then?)

Having beefier running gear is a good thing in the long run, not only for longevity, but would allow them to really get the full torque out of these powertrains.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom