Bolt In Rear Air Bags

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

if you are concerned about full droop, ridetech offers a set of bags that compress down to 6.5", ride is around 10.5"-11.5" and can expand up to 16" they are rated up to 2K at 100 psi and are 6.5 in diameter....
 
Having a detachable suspension component is never a good idea IMHO.
Not so much detactable as not limiting the droop, yet in normal use it is positively located and can't escape. It is frequent to see this sort of thing done elsewhere. Heep XJ front springs are one example that comes to mind. Some of the Dodge truck front springs are done this way. Though it's not a good endorsement I believe that some of the LR's are built this way too.
 
Not so much detactable as not limiting the droop, yet in normal use it is positively located and can't escape. It is frequent to see this sort of thing done elsewhere. Heep XJ front springs are one example that comes to mind. Some of the Dodge truck front springs are done this way. Though it's not a good endorsement I believe that some of the LR's are built this way too.

The suspension is there to control your axle. By allowing uncontrolled droop, you are adding an unknown into the suspension system. Plus, I have seen sticks, mud, snow and a slew other things prevent the suspension components from "going back together" properly.

It can work, but is just another place for the component to fail.

Picking the correct air bags for your intended usage would be a better idea.
 
It would be fine for the front as long as you have enough room to fit the bags in.
 
Cruiser, you could also run some true air shocks int eh front for added load capacity.

You'd have to install some other shock mounts, but it would help.
 
In place. And I mean real air shocks like Fox's or Sway a way, not Monroe's
 
The suspension is there to control your axle. By allowing uncontrolled droop, you are adding an unknown into the suspension system. Plus, I have seen sticks, mud, snow and a slew other things prevent the suspension components from "going back together" properly.

It can work, but is just another place for the component to fail.

Picking the correct air bags for your intended usage would be a better idea.
I'm operating under the assumption that the rear leaves are still in place and these are purely supplement load carrying springs. No way would I do this to a linked & bagged rear suspension, but then in that case no way would I allow the bags to be the droop limits either.
 
I'm operating under the assumption that the rear leaves are still in place and these are purely supplement load carrying springs. No way would I do this to a linked & bagged rear suspension, but then in that case no way would I allow the bags to be the droop limits either.

I agree, but I still think that the concerns of having an unattached suspension component holds true. No matter what, you are utilizing them as a suspension component for something. And, not having them solidly mounted can cause issues..
 
I don't see a problem if it is set up correctly, but to each his own. Just offering a possibility.

Were I going to install an air spring it would be singular and on-center between a trussed axle housing and a purpose built cross member.
 
We run a fleet of Troopys with this style of airbag in the rear end, they're brilliant.

These vehicles spend their entire lives working in exploration, in the sort of wilderness most people only dream of. Flex hasn't been an issue.

There are various manufacturers who offer kits for landcruisers to fit these bags, some are designed for extra long travel / raised suspension whilst others are more like the bags fitted. Shop around, and you'll find something to suit.

(PS have a set here for my 60, just need to get some time to work on her)

Sean
 
This is preety neat. I had never put much thought towards air bags, but sounds like the ride is nice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom