BFG 305/70 A/T KO Tires - Report on Fit & Performance

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

tire size

Just wondering what size tires you could fit with ome 2'' med lift ? Thanks :) :)
 
33's comfortably (285/75R16 or 305/70R16)

-B-
 
295/75-16 works for me
 
Pic added at the request of another board member....
tirefront2.webp
 
Will a BFG AT KO at 285/75/16 fit in the stock spare location? I have the factory trailer hitch which may or may not limit space.
 
rdye said:
Will a BFG AT KO at 285/75/16 fit in the stock spare location? I have the factory trailer hitch which may or may not limit space.

Yes, it does fit. That's what I have
 
I guess I should have stated it is for a stock 93 LC. It looks like there is room for the 285 but nothing larger in diameter.

Thanks
 
rdye,

You may want to check into the simple mod that raises the spare. It's cheap and you gain over 1" of clearance for the spare when mounted under the truck.

-B-
 
rdye said:
Will a BFG AT KO at 285/75/16 fit in the stock spare location? I have the factory trailer hitch which may or may not limit space.

Yes, it does fit. That's what I have, it's tight but it does fit.
 
305/70/16 also fits.....


D-
 
I know this is an old thread but comes up in searches, so thought I would add a pointer to the pdf on BFG's web site that has all the KO tire sizes, diameters, rim widths, RPMs per mile, etc. Very useful information if you want to check sizes, fitment, and change in speedo/odometer readings...

http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/assets/pdf/all_terrain_ta_kd.pdf
 
always good to bump a good thread back to the top once in a while


Im curious, what are the weights of a 275/70 vs 285/75 vs 305/70 tire?

I looked, but musthave been in all the wrong places
 
I've cut and pasted this from another board. He's comparing 33x12.50/16's which is or close to a 305/70-16. I don't know how accurate the info is.

gothamist said:
I've also included the weight of the tires, use this as a relative indication of how much the tires will affect your braking and acceleration, apart from the general problems of getting taller gearing w/ new tires. The weight listed is actually for a *33x12.50* tire, as I don't have the info handy for 31's or 32's. Sorry. :(

BFGoodrich AT/KO: a crowd favorite, tough 3-ply sidewall, good in rocks, snow and hardpacked dirt, bad in mud (they clog.) Very expensive in 16" sizes.
Weight: 49 lbs.

Yokohama Geolander A/T: the underdog, not much feedback on them, less aggressive than the BFG's, supposedly better in wet pavement conditions. A good competitor to the Pirelli Scorpions.
Weight: 48 lbs.

BFG M/T: Excellent tires for the many weekend warriors among us. Relatively tough sidewalls (especially for its weight), hard (but not impossible) to clog in mud, and in general an off-road staple, or so it seems. These don't come siped, so expect poor wet pavement traction, and they aren't the greatest in hard-packed snow (i.e. onroad snow.) You'll hear these tires on the highway, but the other cars around you probably won't.
Weight: 51 lbs.

Yokohama Geolander MT: Very cool directional tires. The directional part of these tires is a double-edged sword, IMHO, because it means you have to make a decision of what type of spare to carry (left or right.) These tires get mixed reviews but most of the people I know who actually own them really like them.
Weight: 55 lbs.

Goodyear Wrangler MT/R: This tire seems to be much more aimed at rocks than mud, but is aggressive enough to get lumped in here. Again one of those, gets-mixed-reviews-but-everyone-who-has-them-seems-to-love-them kind of tires. Does not work as well in mud as BFG MT's, is supposed to have better rock/dirt traction though. The main point of contention seems to be sidewall strength--I'm not sure if these tires are 2 ply or 3 ply. Also very expensive and they run rather small for their size.
Weight: 58 lbs.

Super Swamper SSR: Excellent but expensive, these tires wear fast and weigh a lot. Work great in all but the very gooey-est mud, and have a ton of grip in the rocks. Siped from the factory, and like all Swampers, have very very thick sidewalls. When my set wears out, I'll replace them with another set of SSR's (only maybe a little bigger :D) These tires run big, so be warned. They're also kind of loud on the highway--other cars can hear your tires as you drive by. :finger:
Weight: 67 lbs.
 
Ok,

Since were on tires. I was thinking of a Tall skinny tire. 95% of riding is on pavement, the other 5% is easy wheeling. This would give me good ground clearance, and good gas mileage, correct?
I was thinking of a 255/75/16. Thoughts?

Grouseman
 
Grouseman, a 255/75-16 would get you a 31" tire which is the stock diameter. A 255/85-16 would get you a 33" tire. There are few tires available in the 255/85 and even fewer in the 255/75. But if you find one you like, just make sure the load capacity is at least equal to the OEM tire and you'll be fine.
 
Hoser & Mangler,

Thanks for the info. Wouldn't I get better gas mileage on the road with skinny tires?

GM
 
Yes, you should get better gas mileage and a quieter ride, all else being equal. But since there are more tires available in the larger sizes, probably better ones, you might not see any advantage. i.e. a crappy 255 tire might not ride as nice or be quiet as a leading 275 tire. Which tires have you found in the 255 size?

My recommendation is to pick a few tires that suits your driving style. Then see what sizes they have available. If fuel mileage is your goal, you might have better luck by optimizing your driving style.
 
Beowulf said:
Nope. Most of the monster tyre addicts have the correction gear from Christo. Puts the speedo and odo dead on if you're running 33" tyres.

-B-

Nope. I'm running the Nitto 305's and via GPS I'm speedo wise spot on. :flipoff2:

The stock tyres are way under geared.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom