Yes, in theory wouldn't you lose caster with more "rake"?
"weak or total lack of self-centering wheel, e.g. not unwinding when you let go of the wheel." This sounds like my experience with too little caster.
Yes, I've driven my son's LC "level" (without load), "nose high" (with load) and "tail high" (replace 865 with 860) when we were fiddling with his suspension, in my experience as long as the front wasn't too high (above 22"), and was properly aligned, it didn't have the typical "nasty traits".
Based on my experience with this vehicle, I'm a little skeptical on on whole "rake" thing, but it did make me a huge believer on enough caster and droop. We did end up with typical "rake" with the front at 21.5" and the rear at 23", but that had more to do with compensating for the "nose high" when loaded, than road manners.
"weak or total lack of self-centering wheel, e.g. not unwinding when you let go of the wheel." This sounds like my experience with too little caster.
Yes, I've driven my son's LC "level" (without load), "nose high" (with load) and "tail high" (replace 865 with 860) when we were fiddling with his suspension, in my experience as long as the front wasn't too high (above 22"), and was properly aligned, it didn't have the typical "nasty traits".
Based on my experience with this vehicle, I'm a little skeptical on on whole "rake" thing, but it did make me a huge believer on enough caster and droop. We did end up with typical "rake" with the front at 21.5" and the rear at 23", but that had more to do with compensating for the "nose high" when loaded, than road manners.
Last edited: