Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
No offense, but lift for tire fitment is a common misunderstanding from the solid axle days. In the way that most of our lifts are done for IFS, lift has almost no bearing to clearance. The tire will ultimately travel through the same stroke. Lift just changes the neutral point.
It bears repeating here from Slee so we don't keep persisting this confusion:
You can see in the above pic I just installed a Tundra front suspension lift. The main reason in doing this was to level out my drive shaft angles. This kit uses front and rear cross member drop brackets which lowers the front CV axle. Also uses taller spindles. You can see my drive shafts are pretty much level. This will allow for more lift in the future...thinking 37's next go around!
I believe Slee, but I'm trying to wrap my head around this. Anyone have a diagram or video which shows this?
I can see if you increase the spring length the lift would actually move the tires slightly inward (similar to a +65 or +70 offset) so that kinda makes sense. And I can see how the overall travel "arc" the wheels follow when compressing would be similar. But I'd also think at full compression you would still have more clearance than at full compression of a stock suspension, simply because the springs are longer.
If what Christo is saying is true, then why is Kreiten able to run 285/70R18 on 18x9 +20 offset wheels with his lift but 275/70R18 on stock 18x8 +60 offset wheels barely clears?
I believe Slee, but I'm trying to wrap my head around this. Anyone have a diagram or video which shows this?
I can see if you increase the spring length the lift would actually move the tires slightly inward (similar to a +65 or +70 offset) so that kinda makes sense. And I can see how the overall travel "arc" the wheels follow when compressing would be similar. But I'd also think at full compression you would still have more clearance than at full compression of a stock suspension, simply because the springs are longer.
If what Christo is saying is true, then why is Kreiten able to run 285/70R18 on 18x9 +20 offset wheels with his lift but 275/70R18 on stock 18x8 +60 offset wheels barely clears?
Toyota has thoroughly tested the TRD 17 X 8 +50mm wheel with LT285/70R17 tires - no rubbing under any circumstances, 0 (zero) scrub radius, no alignment issues. That should be a baseline for comparison against any wheel/tire combination you might want to try.
I'm not saying you can't go wider or taller with your tire choice, but by comparing to the baseline wheel/tire setup, you should get a better idea how things will fit.
This is just one tool I use - I have set it up with the 17 X 8 +50mm TRD wheel and LT285/70R17 tire as the satndard on the left and your proposed 17 X 8.5 +0 wheel with LT295/70R17 tires as the proposed setup on the right: Rim & Tire Size Calculator. Custom Offsets
As you can see, this particular modeling tool shows that your wheel/tire combo would not even clear the fender. This model suggests that for that size tire on a 17" wheel, the recommended offest is +48.
I'm not advocating anything, just suggesting you might want to try something else. And, yes, a newer used 200 sounds like a good idea.
HTH
what wheel width is the 18mm offset?Thanks to both @Markuson and @gaijin for their posts & information. The XD128 wheel also comes in an 18 mm offset, so armed with my new information, I'm heading back to 4WheelParts to discuss that possibility. As I mentioned, we had planned on the 295/70/17 R/T's, but the 285 R/T's are not out of the question. Seems like most here run 285's and those seem to fill the wheel wells nicely on lifted LC's.
8.5 I believe.what wheel width is the 18mm offset?
8.5 I believe.
should be good to go, I run a 9 inch wheel with 20mm offset with 285 tires and it tucks good, it's tight but it tucks with no rub!8.5 I believe.
should be good to go, I run a 9 inch wheel with 20mm offset with 285 tires and it tucks good, it's tight but it tucks with no rub!
View attachment 1421971
should be good to go, I run a 9 inch wheel with 20mm offset with 285 tires and it tucks good, it's tight but it tucks with no rub!
good question, not sure so far as hauling a trailer is concerned. We have had the rig loaded with 8 people and have caught air with that weight inside with no rubbing! I see what you are saying though, at full tuck so long as it's just one side it brings it in at an angle, which helps it not hit the fender. I think you might be onto something, with a super heavy trailer this might not be the best setup! I can tell you we have wheeled the S outta this thing at it has not rubbed on the fenders yet!Any issues if you load down the rear evenly? In that pic I assume the right rear wheel is fully extended. Wondering what the clearance was if for instance you had a trailer with 650# tongue weight on the rear? Would it tuck or would both wheels rub the body on a bounce?