Adding coolant temp gauge?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Rich said:
I don't think extreme precision is required from the coolant temp gauge. Here is all I really need to know 1) is the engine warmed up and running at normal operating temp, 2) is it running hotter than normal, but at a fixed temp and not increasing, 3) is it running hotter than normal and continuing to increase, approaching too hot, and 4) is it running too hot.

The factory gauge omits displaying category 2 and 3 info listed above. If the display were more linear, even without degree markings, I would have all the info I need. I would do a one time calibration to determine where "too hot" begins on the gauge.


Get an accurate aftermarket gauge where you really can read the very wide range of temperatures and the very wide range of situations that cause those temperatures and you will completely change your mind on that thought. Until then you are just guessing, and guess what, you are guessing wrong! Besides, your gauge IS NOT linear now so you only have condition 1 above; by the time you get to condition 4 on your gauge it is likely too late.
 
Rich said:
Regarding the temp chart I posted a long time ago, which I believe Raven refers to: I did the test in a water bath, which is why the cutoff temp is below 212. I used an uncalibrated lab thermometer mark in single degrees C, and good quality Fluke multimeter last calibrated in the previous century. I recorded and plotted the change in resistence for each degree centigrade change in bath temperature, stirring the water bath constantly with the thermometer.

It is possible that the water vapor on the sensor skewed the resistence measurements.


Just like the stock gauge, a temp chart that stops at 212 is only showing part of the picture. You should have at minimum used a water/coolant mixture so you could raise the boiling point of using only water especially since there was no pressure induced through the test to raise the boiling point. Ideally you should have used oil so that you could go to 250 or so. Not a criticism, just an observation. :cheers:
 
The limiting factor was the lab thermometer that I had on hand topped out at 100 degrees C. As I did the work on the kitchen stove using a cooking pot, I was not interested in using a toxic bath. This info was included in my original posting.
 
turbocruiser said:
Get an accurate aftermarket gauge where you really can read the very wide range of temperatures and the very wide range of situations that cause those temperatures and you will completely change your mind on that thought. Until then you are just guessing, and guess what, you are guessing wrong! Besides, your gauge IS NOT linear now so you only have condition 1 above; by the time you get to condition 4 on your gauge it is likely too late.

I'm not sure why you are telling me that the factory guage lies. I posted that info on this site a long time ago.

I have towed using a full size truck over 50K miles running around 15k gross combined weight with a factory, non degreed coolant temp gauge, and aftermarket degreed engine oil and transmission fluid temp gauges. The engine was a Ford 460 putting out a lot more heat than a cruiser 4.5.

Once I understood what was normal for any of the temp gauges, all that mattered was is it running normal, or slightly hotter than normal, or are the temps hotter than normal and still rising, or are things out of hand and need to stop now. That is the reality of the situation. A few degrees either way is not really that important as to whether or not any remedial action needs to be taken. It is the relative trends and or the extremes that dictate if further action is required.

So, given I have already had the experience, it is safe to say that I won't be changing my mind.
 
Rich said:
I'm not sure why you are telling me that the factory guage lies. I posted that info on this site a long time ago.

I have towed using a full size truck over 50K miles running around 15k gross combined weight with a factory, non degreed coolant temp gauge, and aftermarket degreed engine oil and transmission fluid temp gauges. The engine was a Ford 460 putting out a lot more heat than a cruiser 4.5.

Once I understood what was normal for any of the temp gauges, all that mattered was is it running normal, or slightly hotter than normal, or are the temps hotter than normal and still rising, or are things out of hand and need to stop now. That is the reality of the situation. A few degrees either way is not really that important as to whether or not any remedial action needs to be taken. It is the relative trends and or the extremes that dictate if further action is required.

So, given I have already had the experience, it is safe to say that I won't be changing my mind.

Rich Respectfully I think you are missing it.
I also have a F450 with a 460 the main difference in the two gauges is that when the Ford changes 30 degrees the gauge moves the LC does not.
 
Oh, no, I am not missing it. I posted info on the flat spot in the cruiser gauge a long long time ago on this website. I may have even been the first to do so. That is why I also went to the trouble to first measure and post the temp resistence curve for the cruiser temp sensor.

I think the factory land cruiser gauge is totally bogus.

The same gauge, behaving in a linear fashion, would suit me just fine.

Getting back to the 460, in a Clubwagon van, when towing in very hot weather under very heavy loads, I.E. 15K lbs, highway, steep grades, hot summer day, all at the same time, it was the engine oil temp that was of more concern than coolant temp. Like the cruiser, the Ford was equipped with two tranny coolers and one engine oil cooler.
 
Last edited:
Whoaaa, Cool Down Rich, You are approaching your own condition # 4 as you referred above. I'm not trying to offend you any at all man, I'm just sharing my perspective on a problem we are both acknowledging in different ways and with different solutions. I'm sincerely sorry if my perspective was wrongly worded any at all, again, only on open conversation on my part. :cheers:
 
I'm not offended at all. Just explaining that what I post is indeed based on my experience. Generally, if I post conjecture, I will say so in the post. Not feeling hot either. Just plain talk. No worries!
 
Rich said:
I don't think extreme precision is required from the coolant temp gauge. Here is all I really need to know 1) is the engine warmed up and running at normal operating temp, 2) is it running hotter than normal, but at a fixed temp and not increasing, 3) is it running hotter than normal and continuing to increase, approaching too hot, and 4) is it running too hot.

The factory gauge omits displaying category 2 and 3 info listed above. If the display were more linear, even without degree markings, I would have all the info I need. I would do a one time calibration to determine where "too hot" begins on the gauge.

i agree with rich, alhtough some calibration would be nice so the "red" is indeed red and I have an idea what temp a few points on the gauge are. It is really kind of annoying to have two temp gauges. I will do it if I have to, but I think what raventai and co. are doing here is the best solution. I even plan to fix my "d" light when I install the mod. ;)
 
Bill, nice big shop, is that a hydraulic tubing bender and big blast cabinet I see?

I think I am going to go with your original chart for now, it is somewhat close to the newest one. Although the newer one gives across the board lower resistance the curve is similar enough. And since we are working with theatrical gauges right now anyway it should be close enough.

main reason being the original corroborates CDans statement that the beginning of the flat spot is around 140F, after a lot of assumptions about this circuit on my part that makes for the beginning of the balance point of the circuit at 75 ohms on the thermistor, your original chart puts it at 135F for 75 ohms witch is very close, also that chart is very wide with temps from 60 F to 270 F making it useful for calculations.


That adds another piece to the puzzle, with the zener diode removed and using the original 75 ohm R1 resistor the gauge would center @ 140 F and travel towards hot from there, the value of the resistor R1 will have to be brought down. Possibly somewhere around 15 -25 ohms.


I think for my testing of the gauge I will get a cheap electric hot plate, they are generally weak and may be more controllable than a propane stove, I think I will heat a pot full of ATF (cheap low viscosity oil), the added mass should slow things down some also, agitation would be best to mix cooler and warmer layers of oil but not sure how to easily do that besides the occasional stir, I like the idea of the plywood, it makes a place to mount everything and keeps heat in witch should help accuracy. Wood also does not conduct much heat nor electricity.

I was originally thinking of trying to use 50/50 mix of coolant and distilled water as it is the medium it will use when installed in the engine, also coolant would circulate and conduct heat better than oil but its boiling point at one atmosphere is between 223 to 227 F depending on who you listen to. And somewhat less at my 900 foot elevation. not high enough to put the gauge though its paces, I cannot think of an easy method for raising its pressure and still getting the sender in there, a pressurized vessel full of hot liquid and a cobbled together garage test just does not sound safe. Also coolant will change concentration over the testing period as the water evaporates


.


In the FSM:

2. INSPECT RADIATOR CAP
………..Using a radiator cap tester, pump the tester and measure the
relief valve opening pressure.
Standard opening pressure:
74 – 103 kPa (0.75 – 1.05 kgf/cm2, 10.7 – 14.9 psi)
Minimum opening pressure:
59 kPa (0.6 kgf/cm2, 8.5 psi)
HINT:
Use the tester’s maximum reading as the opening pressure.
If the opening pressure is less than minimum, replace the radiator
cap.


so average is 12.8 PSI, at that pressure 50/50 coolant boils at…..umm I don’t know, but it is less than 265 F that it boils at under 15 PSI of pressure, so the max I would even think about looking at is somewhere around ~ 260 F as the sender will not read coolant temperatures past that because the coolant will be gone.

Also depending on what chart you look at the sender is getting less and less sensitive as temperature increases resistance is in the single digits.

“Basically, from 175-200 F the temp changes 2 degrees per ohm. 200-210 3 degrees per ohm. 210-220 4 degrees per ohm. 220-230 5 degrees per ohm. 230-245 6. 245-260 7. From 28 ohms at 175F to 5 ohms at 260F “


cary said:
Concerning the range of the guage, I would say a wide range. This would keep the guage from bouncing like a pogo stick every time you speed up or slow down, but would show when the motor starts to heat up.



semlin said:
great work guys, this is fun to read...

concerning the average temp, I suspect that will fluctuate somewhat between trucks. So many possible variables in the vehicle to affect temp and so many miles on them. I would suggest instead targeting the standard thermostat opening temp at say 1/3 or 1/4 of the dial.

I vote for a wide range that would include all possible operating temps. I think that once we have the flat spot eliminated, a wide range will have enough sensitivity for what we need. A significant gauge bounce every time you went up a hill or stopped at a traffic light would be distracting.

Maybe I am being overly optimistic here but I am hoping that Toyota has used good materials in this gauge that would be fairly consistent over years of use, the Wheatstone bridge circuit itself is very accurate and not bothered by problems such as fluctuating source voltage like other circuits. The air core motor also within reason does not wear out, it has a permanent magnet rotor, even major degradation of the magnet would not affect reading until it did not have the strength to move the needle. The stators are just windings of copper wire, as long as there is a continuous connection and no shorts between winds they will produce a consistent field for any given amperage. As long as all the components are in good shape it should be reasonably repeatable truck to truck, I have no idea’s on year differences yet but have not seen any indication that they are different yet so for now will assume they are the same.

For fluctuating temperatures if they are fluctuating personally I would like to see that, I would think (probably optimism again) that as I cruise down the highway at a consistent speed on flat or on the gently rolling hills around here the temperature would be fairly constant.


Gauge said:
Actually I don't mind watching the gauge rise when I am climbing a hill and go down when I am descending - at least I know that my gauge is working. And if my engine gets hot, even if it is for a short time, I don't mind knowing that.


Cary Semlin and Gauge, any chance putting #’s to those ranges? Maybe we are thinking more alike than we think. One though I had was making the middle the normal operating temp (still don’t know exactly what that is but it is around 200 F) and perhaps the bottom of the red area be around 226, that # was sinifigant to Toyota for some reason as that is where the AC kicks off at. total WAG but that would give 245 or better where the gauge pegs up over the “H”, does anybody want to know any more than 245 F? For me no I need to shut down before then. This would not show much of the warm up, another WAG maybe first movement off cold at 155F, again anything below that is just “not close to operating temp yet” to me in a northern climate I could see where you may want to see more because there is “not warmed up yet” and below that “really not warmed up yet”


Anyway any #’s helpful, what average operating temp is being seen and also what temperatures you would like to be able to see.


The Miata mod includes several different ranges people can select for their mod, maybe I can do that also

Turbocruiser, no offence taken, discussion gets to the bottom of things. Boils them down to truths. I see some of what you are saying, a marked wide range gauge is quite very nice. It Gives real #’s to work with almost down to the degree, but a modified stock gauge is enough to tell me enough about engine temperature to make decision on its operation. With testing of the circuit both “on the stove” and in the truck with comparison to OBD2 readings translations of needle position to temperature can be made. This is all I want and is good enough for me. I would say that I do want to do this.




Rookie2 said:
Awesome. Got one on the way. This is perfect, learn a little about electronics, and have another resource for enhancing the GA knowledge.

:beer:
Rookie2


I forgot besides being an engineer you are also a private pilot, I hope you like : )


Once we have a working gauge, It would also be great to have an overlay sticker to apply directly to the gauge face (not the bezel) with a few data points. That seems like a job for a graphic design person to come up with something that looked reasonably oem.

Another thought I have had on the LED alarm issue is that the turbo diesel 80's have an LED light in the tachometer instrument face to indicate when the turbo is on. The tach is otherwise identical so I wonder if the 80 gas series tachs might already have a ready made mounting point and punchout hole for an LED that could be drilled to allow for this as a temp alarm.


I’ll look next time I am in the cluster. I am pretty sure the face card of the temp gauge could be drilled to accommodate an LED, or better yet just back light the gauge red, it does pass light in the white areas. Might be a little dim in the day. I am wondering if an LED could be integrated into the gauge without needing a switch, possibly even using the removed zener diode as the trigger. Tapping another device in the circuit would change its readings some, the smaller the current the less change. Hmmm getting more complicated.



This is getting long, Going to need a recap soon.
 
I think that 226 is a fine top range, but 250 would probably be better so that the guage doesn't fluctuate widely during normal driving. I can't recall who posted it above, but as they are, I am mostly concerned with the temperature rising. If I can see that it is rising out of its normal range, I can be proactive and kill the air/ turn on the heat as neccessary. I tend to be conservative, by the time the motor gets to 226f, I will have shut it down and let it cool. As long as we have a rough reference point for the temps, that is all I need.
 
RavenTai said:
I am wondering if an LED could be integrated into the gauge without needing a switch, possibly even using the removed zener diode as the trigger. Tapping another device in the circuit would change its readings some, the smaller the current the less change. Hmmm getting more complicated.

I'm guessing a piezo buzzer like Photoman mentioned, would pull even more current than an LED?
 
I think Rich and Turbocruiser's disagreement boiled down to the "level of accuracy". My experience with Turbocruiser, and I only know him from reading his posts, is that he is a perfectionist and enjoys paying attention to the "finer details". For him, it might be important to know that the engine temperature is exactly 215.5 degrees. And I totally see his point that we would NEVER be able to get that level of accuracy from the OEM gauge - even if it did work properly - so why bother?

But for some people, the exact temperature may not be all that important. So long as I can eyeball it and know within 10 to 20 degrees the engine's temperature - that's good enough.

For me, I would LOVE to know the EXACT temperature, but I can't stomach the fact that I would have to install a new gauge that tells me the same information as the gauge I already have - only because it doesn't work. So for that reason, if we can get the OEM gauge to work as it should I would be happy.

Turbocruiser - if I have you wrong, feel free to slap me up side my head. My comment on your perfectionism is not intended to be an insult in any way, but rather as a compliment. I always enjoy reading your posts - particularily because you do pay attention to details. :cheers:
 
Gauge said:
Turbocruiser - if I have you wrong, feel free to slap me up side my head. My comment on your perfectionism is not intended to be an insult in any way, but rather as a compliment. I always enjoy reading your posts - particularily because you do pay attention to details. :cheers:


Gauge, you are very wise man, you are absolutely bang-on and i am not offended any at all. My perfectionism is both an asset and a liability as far as I see it. In fact my father's favorite saying to me while I was younger was "perfection's the enemy to good enough!"

I really did not mean to offend Rich any at all, I tried to dance the dance of respectful disagreement but fell flat on the old face while doing so. Rich I am sincerely sorry and I think that the wise Gauge here has hit it that the objectives we are wanting are different and therefore the ways to get to those objectives are different. Nothing wrong with either approach and I do wish you and anyone around here luck with fixing the fawked up gauge (not Gauge, just gauge as in temp gauge).

Anyways, no harm no foul as far as I see it, I'm off to fix other imperfections :D


:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:
 
would say having the beginning of the red be 226 is ok if that's what folks want, but having it be say 220 would give you 2 data points since you would also know where 226 is when the a/c shuts off. Also, 226 means you are officially overheated so I am not sure that should be the threshold of the red zone. it's a little like runnign on empty. people assume you still have some leeway.

the first movement being 155 is also fine, although I would rather see the t-stat opening temp (180?) at the 1/4 point of the dial movement so it could be reliably marked.

The top of the red and first movement would be whatever follows from that range I guess... let's use some flexibility once we actually get one to work.

I agree the gauges will likely be consistent if modded properly, but I think the actual operating temps of trucks will vary even in the same climate and under the same load. Looking at the fan clutch thread people are seeing 10 degree operating variations in similar trucks.
 
turbocruiser said:
Gauge, you are very wise man, you are absolutely bang-on and i am not offended any at all. My perfectionism is both an asset and a liability as far as I see it. In fact my father's favorite saying to me while I was younger was "perfection's the enemy to good enough!"

I really did not mean to offend Rich any at all, I tried to dance the dance of respectful disagreement but fell flat on the old face while doing so. Rich I am sincerely sorry and I think that the wise Gauge here has hit it that the objectives we are wanting are different and therefore the ways to get to those objectives are different. Nothing wrong with either approach and I do wish you and anyone around here luck with fixing the fawked up gauge (not Gauge, just gauge as in temp gauge).

Anyways, no harm no foul as far as I see it, I'm off to fix other imperfections :D


:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:

TC, you're a good man and I think you made some valid points before. But part of the dynamic that exist here, is the challenge/satisfaction of fixing something that just doesn't work the way it should (most likely as a result of complaints from "those damn soccer moms"). When and if these guys get something worked out, I'm sure they'll feel some of the same satisfaction that say C'dan felt when he worked out the pin 7, or Raven and Landtank when they worked out the window auto up mod. Isn't this what seperates us from the apes? :D

:beer:
Rookie2
 
Rookie2 said:
Isn't this what seperates us from the apes? :D

:beer:
Rookie2



I thought it was the parts counter........... :flipoff2:
 
For what it's worth I just ordered the ISSPRO 5650R from egauge.com along with an A pillar pod. After doing the PHH and cooling system flush my A/C compressor is now cycling on and off. The needle on the stock gauge is about 2mm below halfway, so I don't think it's at 226, but as everyone has mentioned, it's next to impossible to know based on the needle position. So w/out knowing the actual engine temp it's basically a crap shoot to start troubleshooting.

I went with the 5650R because its electric, 270 deg. sweep, from 100-240. I like the idea of finer graduations so I can label the danger zone for the :princess: . http://www.egauges.com/vdo_mult.asp?Type=Elec_Engine_Temp&Series=EVA-R&Cart= I didn't do much research, just checking around summit and a few other sites.

Thanks for the mentioning the egauge site Flint.

Tony
 
Last edited:
That may be the same gauge I just fitted. I do not recall the number tho, I just got it from Ben at Slee. Mine is a 270 degree sweep from 100 to 240 so I bet it is the same. I quite like it.

The sender is 1/8 NPT and I put it in the upper neck. There is also a "driver" box of sorts that is needs to be positioned under the dash. The instructions tell you how to power the gauge but they make no mention about illumination. There are two Male spades on the back of the gauge for illumination. Those need to be run independently from the wires that power the gauge.
 
Thanks for the input on the illumination.

Of all the gauges I looked at, it seemed to have the finest graduations in the sub $100 price range.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom