6.2 chev in 40

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

handcannon,
ever think about doing a Marlin Crawler toybox as an adapter between the toyota t-case and the 700R4. looks like you are going to add something between 9-10" to adapt everything with the AA adapter and 203. I guess you're using the doubler to give you back some of the low end from going to the 700R4? I think the toybox is around 12" (not sure on that one) and from what I've heard its as tough as you can get for our application. The only issue is $$$. I'm not taking the "spare no expense" route on this project, but I am trying to get things the way i want them the first time. Right know my planned combo is the 6.2 (maybe with some sort of force induction ;) ) with the 700R4, 2.28 toybox, stock 16 spline t-case, 3.7 gears and 33" tall tires. With this setup I'll be able to cruise at 68 mph at 1800 rpms in overdrive and still have a crawl ratio of 50. Something to think about.

Brian,
Like most older diesel it likes its RPM low for fuel economy. Most say around 1800RPM is the sweet spot, which happens to be where this engine seems to make most of it torque. This might vary a bit depending on mods. As for MAX RPM, I think it 4500RPM but I would have to check to make sure about that one

Going from my reading about them, 1800 to 2200 RPM is the best running range with about 2000 to 2100 as optimum for economy. I think 3500 is max RPM. Don't have a tach in the 83 pickup yet so no first hand info.

Don

Was going from memory on these numbers, take with a grain of salt. Didn't read Kevin's post before posting.

I've wondered about a 6.2 since it is a near direct physical swap with a 350.

But what this tells me is that it is a poor idea without an overdrive, and even then it still may not work out.

My FJ40 needs about 3000 rpm at 60 mph. Even with a 5-speed aussie Toy tranny, that would only drop it to 2400, which is not within the optimal fuel economy range. How much of a penalty there would be, I dunno. On the other hand, if I recall right, first gear in this tranny is lower than the domestic 4-speed, so perhaps it would allow a change of gears from 4.10 to 3.73., which is a 10% change. RPM would drop from 2400 to 2160.

That puts the RPMs into the ballpark, but at what cost? First there's the engine. I have no clue what a decent runner would cost, nor what it would cost to rebuild one. Anyone?

Then there are the peripheral parts, like flywheels, clutch, wiring mods, etc. Maybe budget $300 for this?

The aussie 5-speed is $2500 for a runner, and $3000 and up for a rebuilt, not counting shipping.

The gears possibly could be swapped straight across with someone who wants 4.10s, as they are more desirable than the 3.73s, so I'll chalk this one up as needing nothing more than gaskets and fluid.

I'm guessing this conversion would exceed $3500 at a minimum, and could easily go another $1000 on top of that.

Benefits would be a doubling of the fuel economy, from 9 to 10 mpg to 20 to 21 mpg. (Which brings up another question - does the 6.5 with turbo get better fuel economy?)

On the other hand, diesel costs more than gas. Right now, locally, diesel is only 10 to 20 cents more a gallon. But it has gone as much as $1 to $1.50 more per gallon.

Biodiesel. More and more we're seeing local demands for biodiesel blends. Ford will not warranty their engines with more than a 5% mix. How does the 6.2 like biodiesel?

Driveability. My 350 is quite streetable, with the proper carb (Quadrajet). It was miserable with a Holley. It lugs almost as good as a six-banger with the Quadrajet, but could not lug whatsoever with the Holley. It also can accelerate decently when it needs to. The diesel has outstanding low end torque, but would otherwise be sluggish, especially around town. The diesel would also be immune to steep grades and slopes, though some carbs do a fairly good job with this.

Because of the costs of conversion, the diesel would have to be compared to installing fuel injection on a 350. The two route are to just drop on an Edlebrock on the stock carbed 350, or put on a factory EFI unit with heads designed for it. I'm told this can get the fuel economy of the FJ40 with 4.10 gears into the 14 to 15 mpg range. Comments?

Doing the math, if the fuel savings for a diesel vs carbed gas is about half, that means the payoff for $3500 minimum in conversion costs would be, of course, $3500 in fuel. I'm only putting about 1500 miles per year on my FJ40 at most. At 10 mpg, that 150 gallons. Multiply that by, say, $3.00 a gallon (prices will probably go up during the payoff period) and that's $450 in fuel. Saving half of that by going diesel would be $225.

So in my situation, $3500 to convert (and we need to more accurately define this figure) divided by $225 per year in savings means it would take 15 years to pay off the investment.

Obviously a daily driver would pay off sooner. And if the conversion cost more it would push it off later.

Now in my case, I'd be swapping out a perfectly good 350, which could be sold. But I can see this swap being more justifiable for someone with a dead motor, or even a project FJ40 with no engine at all. That's where it starts to look attractive because you have the cost of the engine on both sides of the ledger sheet.
 
Don,

Looks like you already have some of the parts so I would make what you have work. I think its a good combo.

My 6.2/700r4 combo came out of a 2wd van so I'm thinking the toybox is a better option for me. Your going to have a really short drive shaft even with flipping the stock spring. You might want to look at what some of these guys did to give them a longer wheelbase (you've probably already seen this thread) https://forum.ih8mud.com/hardcore-corner/263347-whats-your-fj40-wheelbase.html

I'm definitly going to 3.70 because I'm litmited to 33" tires. I'm only going with a 2.5" lift on the truck and anything more then 33" will cause some issues. The 40 is going to mostly be a DD but will be used for some light offroad for now. Never done much offroad before so I want to see what my likes will be.

As for the force induction, I am worried about some of the same issues you mentioned when going turbo. So I'm thinking I might go supercharger. I has not been done much on 6.2 used on land but has been big with the 6.2 and 6.5 used in a marine applications. I think most guys go turbo because there are existing solutions. I've always been a fan of superchargers (don't know why, never own one) and I'm thinking that a M90 from a gm/pontiac 3.8 from the late 80-early 90 might work. They are cheap to get used and can be rebuilt for a little money. I talked about it with some guys from the Diesel page forum and I'm thinking that might be something interesting to try out. Take a look at the link: TheDieselPage.com Forums

Kevin

Thanks for the links. I spent quite a bit of time last night reading them. I have just recently started keeping up on the Hardcore section and found that link to be a very interesting read. I really enjoyed the link/info about the supercharger. If you have more info about superchargers I'd be interested in reading about them.

Don
 
Brian,

I think you've answered your own question. I would stick with the 350 if you've already got a good setup. As for getting better milage on the highway the 5 speed toy tranny is a option but there's also some good overdrive unit out there that can be used with a stock 4 speed and lets you split some gear if you're into offroading. Gearvendors overdrive unit is an option.

If you still want to do the 6.2 swap, I think you're numbers where a little conservative. Unless you get a really good 6.2, you will have to do some work on it if you want any life out of the engine. You would also have to worry about hooking it all up. You would also have to worry about suspension as the 6.2 is a lot heavier then the 350.

If you want to do this for fuel economy saving, I would go with the fuel injection upgarde you where talking about and call it the day. I don't think the money you want to invest would be worth while in the 6.2. I'm doing a full restore/upgrade to my 40 and wanted to go diesel because I like diesel. I looked at the Toyota diesels but I found them really expensive. I got a complete gm van with the 6.2 & 700r4 for $600, so this gave me a lot of the piece I needed to do the swap.

If I where you I would probably keep what you got and see if there's something you can do to give you better highway.

Don,
The supercharger idea is still in the works, but for now it's taken a back burner to getting the body installed onto the frame. Once the body is installed, I have to install the doors, so that I get the hardtop stretched. Once that is done, I'll fab up the power steering. Then I can drop the engine, tranny, toybox & t-case.... I hope to get this 40 back on the road in 1 1/2 from now ;)
 
Kevin, agreed. That was the conclusion I came to after doing the math. I would really like to do a 6.2 conversion, but the return on the investment is not there. And the performance gain at slow speed is not an overwhelming argument in its favor. Now if my 350 puts a rod through the side of the block, then maybe the slate would be almost wiped clean for starting over. I say almost because an overdrive or 5th gear would still be needed. As it is, with as few miles as I put on it, the 350 is likely to last me until I physically cannot hoist myself into the cab.
 
Hey you guys ,been away for a while.Just a recap on the 6.2,after hunting and wheeling it for a few months I have growen to love it more every day.The fella I hunt with has the 350 in his,he is definatley faster of the line but as far as torque and millage the 6.2 has him beat buy far.Ive yet to stall while wheeling and he is continually starting his up,you could argue driver on that one.And as far as millage I fill my tank once to his three times,same tanks both 12 gals.Mine has a lot more vibration than his and both about the same for cab noise.He heats up and I dont,and again you could argue rad condition.After doing several of these things the gas pot is by far cheeper and easier to do.I just think the millage and torque sold me on the 6.2.
 
dargreg,
Good to here. Makes me want to get that engine into the truck. Keep us updated as time go by.
 
dargreg,
Good to here. Makes me want to get that engine into the truck. Keep us updated as time go by.

X2 on that dargreg.

Kevin, I would appreciate it if you could keep us updated. As for me, my progress is highly dependant on my financial situation which right now is very poor (pun intended). Right now we are trying to survive on my wifes' income.

Don
 
Don,
I feel for your situation. I was in the same boat a few years ago. But this gave me time to do the research like you're doing now. Good luck with the financial situation and hope to see you building soon.
 
Ya I remember the 42 the kid and I did.We were both caught up in a strike.I told him remember Rome wasn,t built in a day so we begged, borrowed, without the other party knowing so that means we stoled a great amount of parts and meterial,but we got it done in time for hunting.
 
I will be using the Matt Bier mounts on the 6.2 diesel install I am doing. The 6.2 mounts are different than the Chev 350 mounts, but both engines bolt to the same Chevy frame. Hence, the Matt Bier mounts will work since they are basically part of the frame. The difference in mounts is, the 6.2 metal brackets are narrower than the 350 brackets. Other than that, they are the same. I like the Matt Bier mounts in that they use the stock 6.2 rubber. There is more rubber than the AA kits that I have used. Hence, I think they will last longer.
 
Ok Im just curious, I kinda skimmed through the whole thread(staring at the computer for too long). Any way it is mentioned that the 350 and 6.2 are almost the same and can swap between another, mounts wise. Im not a chevy guy, but this is what I got a 73 FJ40 with chevy 307(idk if same mounts as 350) with the original 3spd and tcase, I figure sbc mounts are sbc mounts right. I have access to several CUCV's (military chevy pickups with the 6.2's). Would a 6.2 swap over?

Im just curious because the 73 I bought for parts, but since it cost me a few hundred to put it into my name I might keep it and make a buggy or something. And a 6.2 in a 40 would be pretty unique in hawaii.
 
1sickmj,
I think you have to be carefull when it come to mounts for the 6.2. Yes it is the same bolt pattern as SBC but the 6.2 is a lot heavier. Go back to post #20 & #21 of this thread where dargreg and I discuss the mounts he used. You might want to do something like crnzdawg is doing in post #70. I know I'll be using the original mounts from the 6.2 that I got from the donor vehilce and replace the old rubber with some poly mounts instead.
 
kcustom73,

Oh yeah I wouldnt use the mounts that are in it now. PO did a hack job. The part that concerned me was bolting to the trans, but then I went to work and looked at the trucks I thought "where would I get a manual fly wheel" and "that starter is huge, i wonder if would fit in that bell housing". Ill double check the thread for that info though. Thanks
 
I know this thread is old, but was wondering if dargreg or kcuston73 are still here on Mud. If so do you have any updates on your projects?

Don
 
Don,

I'm still around and I'm sort of glad you brought this thread back up. My 40 is in "the get'er done" mode this year and I'm about to start installing the drivetrain. I'm hoping dragreg is still around so that I can pick is brain on his install.

I've had a lot of issues finding all the parts I needed for the drivetrain but I got that all sorted out now. I'm still using the 6.2 with the 700R4 behind it but I've gone with a NP203/splitcase combo behind the tranny. I was having too many issues getting a toybox from Marlin crawler and with the extra length I have with my 40 this combo will fit and still have a descent rear drive shaft.

Once my body parts come back from the blasters I will start mocking up the drivetrain. I plan on fabing up my own motor mounts based on the original GM mounts and then put a crossmember between the tranny and the NP203 (stock mount location) and one on the back of the splitcase. Keep an eye on my build thread as I will be posting what I do there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom