2024 LC 250 Land Cruiser 1958 VS First Edition @ XOverland RANCH! (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Threads
73
Messages
2,017
Location
BoZ ANGeLES
Website
backcountryadventuretime.com
I drove the 1958, Ben drove the First Edition
5D4AFACE-CC35-495D-90D8-C810AAB15568.JPEG


Available for rent at Hatch Adventures in Bozeman, MT!

Hatch Adventures | 4WD Car Rentals Bozeman Montana - https://hatchadventures.com/

You can take them where ever you want, just know you’ll pay for damage and they only place Ben told me he tells people not to go is the Morrison jeep trail in WY which I certainly would not do in a rental

A little bit about me:

I daily drive a TURBO CHARGED LX450 on 37s and bead locks and a Fiat 124 spyder

I used to drive a FJ cruiser on 35s and kings

I have seen just about every Toyota generation wheeling in Moab, MT trails, CO trails, spotted numerous Toyotas over rocks, snow, sand. Just about everything you can imagine through years of running the trail rides for the local cruiser club. I have driven the Rubicon in my LX, have guided at Cruise Moab before I was blacklisted.

I won’t go into price point, cost or anything like that. I’m going to focus more on the off road feels and capability side, and we didn’t do any actual measurements, just more of a real-world application and thoughts then actual nerd data. No scientific method.

Initial impressions

The black on black looks good, minus the Prius wheels and tires, these would be the first thing to go. Interior was all mechanical seats, no stupid button on the rear hatch. Of course, I’m going to mention the fact I hate the rear lift gate/ losing the tailgate was a poor decision but this isn’t a real land cruiser anyways. Personally, I loved the feel of the cloth seats! I thought they looked great. The toggle switches are weird. I like dials and buttons but this is nit picking and I’m sure id get used to it. Seemed to have plenty of space in the back to haul weekends work of stuff but I’m just one guy. The big step up in the rear area was weird and defiantly made it seem like there was less space. Also, the cup holders in the rear area were strange. Someone told me this is because they sell a third row in other parts of the world for this one.

Drivability on the interstate

Felt great getting in the on ramp. Felt like plenty of power to get up to speed. Bare in mind I drive a big fat whale of an 80 series so going faster then 70 MPH is FLYING. Got up to 95-100 MPH without me really noticing. I was following the First edition out to the ranch and I looked down and was going 95. Maybe a slight body bobble around the corners but I was really pushing it when I was driving on the curvy road to the OX ranch. It is a rental after all. I got about 17 MPG according to the dashboard. Seems pointless to mess with the hybrid stuff if I only got 17 with idling, A/C on, low range and driving as fast as possible everywhere.
IMG_8593.JPEG

OX offroad course test track

Hill climbs – Mindless. Easy effortless. I did get the LC to get slightly held up when I choose the line up the hill climb that was completely overgrown grass and set it at one for speed, but I’m going to blame that one on the prius tires.



Descents – driving down the hills was a cake walk. Even with the Prius tires. First couple a of descents I did un assisted with just foot on the brake. Decent angles, but this was a closed course test track. Noting to cray cray really.

Flex – The LC defiantly flexes much better than the 5th gen runner and the tacos I have seen, I know not much of a comparison. But I was impressed. I did not see the flex photos until a couple days later and I didn’t realize how far off the ground it truly was. It still felt solid and level. The FI defiantly flexed noticeably more. We tried our best to put both cruisers on the same line and see which one flexed more. The FI had the advantage of the sway bar disconnects, and best be could tell it made a noticeable bit of difference. We did not use the scientific method. Just visual and I think on of the guys standing outside said it had at least three fingers more flex over the 1958 in the rear. The pictures tell the story
F173706D-1A14-4A96-94B9-2C818C9E3BCD.JPEG

0033C9B3-8FEE-4AF1-BC07-FD3640B0986D.JPEG

Constant beeps and notifications -This was very annoying. Granted this was a rental but this is the first thing I would turn off. There were numerous warnings that kept popping up. Especially on the steep hill descents. Collision warning? I went with a bunch of Toyota sales men and the told me I could give out how to make it go away but I just went with the solution I’m used to from driving older vehicles. Turn up the music and ignore the warning lights and sounds.

CRAWL CONTROL WILL DISENGUAGE IMMEDIATELY IF YOU TRY AND OPEN THE DOOR, YOU CANT GHOST RIDE THE WHIP.

Visibility – Much better than a 5G 4runner. Much better then 3G Tacoma. The Tacoma’s are almost worse than the visibility in a FJ cruiser. Of course, the 80 series is the best LC ever made so I’m going to compare it to this. The visibility isn’t bad defiantly a smaller nose then most modern Toyotas but not as good as my 80. The front has a weird channel in the front that is higher on the two sides. Not ideal but still way better then the taco or the runner.

“Devils toboggan” – this was an obstacle on the back section of the ranch. It is a long hill. Id says about 200-250 yards long and steep and narrow with side where it was cut into the side of the hill. Lets call it at least 30% grade and loose gravel and scree. Its long enough that I would think twice about driving up it. And if I did it would be triple locked and at 5psi and full send. I was the eighth vehicle to drive down it so it was pretty town up while I was driving down it. Serious respect to crawl control after driving this obstacle. Its literally set the dial at one and just hod the wheel. It made this decent mindless. Just sit back and enjoy the view. Straight down. There also was a noticeable difference in the what we kept referring to as the Gen 2 crawl control vs the OG crawl control. The tacos with Gen one CC were noticeably faster, slid more on the scree and they made the very loud sound. If anyone hasn’t heard first gen CC in person it sounds like there a rock or something in the brakes. It’s not a pleasant sound. The LC is smooth, and silent. It was slightly entertain hearing the comments from the others driving the G1 CC about how much better the LC was doing it.

I really would love to test the crawl control somewhere like Moab because I feel like this would shine even more on the slick rock.
IMG_8587.JPG





Final thoughts

I would not sell a 200 series for this. This is not a real land cruiser, and we knew that. It’s a Prado. I kept referring to it as the Kirkland version of the land cruiser.

IT makes me really want to wheel the new GX.

Buy the most expensive GX and leave it stock. Only upgrade the tires. OR buy this land cruiser base model and do lift sliders and 35s and hopefully all the electronic stuff still works and the bigger tires don’t screw up the crawl control.
 
Last edited:
Looking over the nose going down the devils toboggan
IMG_8584.JPG

Pictures never do it justice

IMG_4616.JPG


IMG_4616.JPG


IMG_8587.JPG
 
Last edited:
There are a number of Glamor shots coming from the other obstacles and videos once i have a chance to figure out the easiest way to post videos on the forum.

RESERVED FOR ADDITIONAL PHOTOS AND VIDS WHEN THE BECOME AVAILABLE
DSC_0032.JPG
 
Great write up. I would love to see more of the XO Ranch.

Final thoughts

I would not sell a 200 series for this. This is not a real land cruiser, and we knew that. It’s a Prado. I kept referring to it as the Kirkland version of the land cruiser.

...but, man, the Toyota USA guerrilla marketing team on this board is going to terrorize you for these comments in 3...2...1... 😂
 
Last edited:
Great write up. I would love to see more of the XO Ranch.



...but, man, the Toyota USA guerrilla marketing team on this board is going to terrorize you in 3...2...1... 😂
i fully expect to get completely roasted on the internet for this post.

WAIT they gave an 80 series guy a what?....and he got to drive it where? its an overlanders wet dream.

:popcorn:

I'm going to post a separate review of the XO ranch experience. It was dope. give me a couple of daze
 
Final thoughts

I would not sell a 200 series for this. This is not a real land cruiser, and we knew that. It’s a Prado. I kept referring to it as the Kirkland version of the land cruiser.

IT makes me really want to wheel the new GX.

Buy the most expensive GX and leave it stock. Only upgrade the tires. OR buy this land cruiser base model and do lift sliders and 35s and hopefully all the electronic stuff still works and the bigger tires don’t screw up the crawl control.

Cool review, although this section was a bit underwhelming. What kind of conclusion is that? The review reads like the 250 did very well off road. But then, surprisingly (to me at least), the sum total of your final thoughts are basically: "don't trade in your 200", and, "the 250 is unworthy of the land cruiser name".

So did you like the 250? Because I couldn't really tell after reading your review. I mean it seemed like you did? But then you kind of lost me with the final thoughts
 
Cool review, although this section was a bit underwhelming. What kind of conclusion is that? The review reads like the 250 did very well off road. But then, surprisingly (to me at least), the sum total of your final thoughts are basically: "don't trade in your 200", and, "the 250 is unworthy of the land cruiser name".

So did you like the 250? Because I couldn't really tell after reading your review. I mean it seemed like you did? But then you kind of lost me with the final thoughts
I loved it. but not as a land cruiser.
 
I loved it. but not as a land cruiser.
I’m curious if you could unpack this. The Land Cruiser Prado has a great reputation around the world. The The US LC 200 had moved far away from the original design of the Land Cruiser which was an affordable, dependable vehicle that could hold its own off road. The new 250 moved back towards being a more capable off road vehicle and back to a more aesthetically pleasing design. The original land cruisers were not great at towing, this one can hold its own. Get a 250 truck if you want to haul large toys over the LC200. The manufacturer calls them a Land Cruiser. Reminds me of when a friend’s father used to tell me that digital cameras will never replace film. How wrong he was…

I do appreciate your insights and sharing your experience. Great photos
 
I’m curious if you could unpack this.

It reminds me more of my old FJ cruiser more then my 80 series. And we all know the FJ cruiser was closer to the original design of the FJ40 then any of the newer cruisers.

I LOVED it as a really really good toyota, hands down better then a 4runner. or Sequoia Etc. but it didn't touch me like a real land cruiser does.
 
The Kirkland version 😂

Now don your helmet.
I mean this as a term of endearment. We all know that most of these vehicles are gonna spend more time in the Costco parking lot then on any actual trails anyways.
 
I mean this as a term of endearment. We all know that most of these vehicles are gonna spend more time in the Costco parking lot then on any actual trails anyways.
And you didn’t call it Member’s Mark…
 
It reminds me more of my old FJ cruiser more then my 80 series. And we all know the FJ cruiser was closer to the original design of the FJ40 then any of the newer cruisers.

I LOVED it as a really really good toyota, hands down better then a 4runner. or Sequoia Etc. but it didn't touch me like a real land cruiser does.
The FJ is / was just a 4Runner with a different body. The new 250 is better considered another 6th Gen 4Runner trim level.
 
What I’ve learned over the last couple months is everyone has their own opinion about what is and isn’t a Land Cruiser and guess what? They are all right, yet wrong at the same time. 40’s, 55’s, 60’s, 70’s, 80’s 100’s, 200’s, 300’s? All Land Cruisers. 120’s 150’s, 250’s? Also Land Cruisers.
 
What I’ve learned over the last couple months is everyone has their own opinion about what is and isn’t a Land Cruiser and guess what? They are all right, yet wrong at the same time. 40’s, 55’s, 60’s, 70’s, 80’s 100’s, 200’s, 300’s? All Land Cruisers. 120’s 150’s, 250’s? Also Land Cruisers.
YES

Sheez ppl, LC is a LINE of vehicles. Ok, we were ‘spoiled’ with the only the flagship for decades. Now its gone and we have the Prado. (Insert terrified face)

Im thrilled to have the 250 here, would be great to have the 300 to accompany but we dont so is what it is.
 
YES

Sheez ppl, LC is a LINE of vehicles. Ok, we were ‘spoiled’ with the only the flagship for decades. Now its gone and we have the Prado. (Insert terrified face)

Im thrilled to have the 250 here, would be great to have the 300 to accompany but we dont so is what it is.
Yep, and with any of those flagships you can make a case one way or the other about which one is or isn’t your definition of a LC. The most popular models here in North America all got more luxurious and less off road/utility focused with each new generation. Personally I don’t mind, in fact I quite enjoy a nice, upscale yet understated vehicle that is also capable but then again by the time the 200 got here they didn’t even give us the option of a rear locker.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom