Why can't someone be both an outdoorsman and a dentist? Why can't we acknowledge that the 200 series is overbuilt compared to every other production vehicle on the market, regardless of what the 70 series is (which is really irrelevant considering its unavailability here for its first 25 yrs)? After all, that entire package is really why we are here and passionate about Land Cruisers, isn't it?
I always thought the real magic of the Land Cruiser was that we could have both luxury and off road quality. That we could have something overbuilt but still a daily driver. That we could get groceries AND go camping. I've had a diesel 60, an 80, a 100, three 200's, a GX550, two Tacomas, and two 4Runners. Half I took off-road, and half I babied as if they were museum pieces.
If you prefer the more utilitarian, toughest of the tough Land Cruiser series, have at it. If you want to get groceries, have at it too. Needless to say, go over to the 200 series threads and you'll see they are capable of much more than a 'wagon' and somehow their owners seem to be able to drive themselves off the trails with a smile on their faces.
What value does any of us get from poking bears like that......and on a forum dedicated to bears? Goofiness.
So the 70 series is your preference, and for you Land Cruisers are wholly utilitarian off road toughness. Great. I'm happy for you. Enjoy. Leave those with different and more varied priorities and interests to their different and more varied priorities and interests......or better yet go over to a Bronco/Defender forum and rip their waste of $70-110K there.
Its really all about choosing your bears more wisely.