100 Series vs 80 Series (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Thise are not from Consumer Reports though it doesn't matter. We all have driven these things with big tires and we all know the outcome.


Now wait a minute! First you say "worst in class" and "unsafe." Now you say only when wearing 35" tires! Make up your mind!

So if I slap 35's on a Honda Passport, I bet the 80 is still better!

But it won't part the Red Sea like John's 100... :flipoff2:
 
Now wait a minute! First you say "worst in class" and "unsafe." Now you say only when wearing 35" tires! Make up your mind!

So if I slap 35's on a Honda Passport, I bet the 80 is still better!

But it won't part the Red Sea like John's 100... :flipoff2:

:D

Tell you what! Since so many of you are in denial about the brakes....I have a video coming. Stay tuned.

:D
 
How do you know?

He's posted on it before and I've talked to him on the phone.

But so what? 1 busted CV joint. One is no weakness. Hell, after my dealer ruined my one by not clamping a boot properly I ran Spike and Fins and came home OK. Show me all the breakage on 100's and I'll back down. :D
 
Since so many of you are in denial about the brakes


That's hilarious coming from you! I think if you look up "denial" in the dictionary, you'll see this:

:shotts:
 
Show me all the breakage on 100's and I'll back down. :D


No you won't. And given their relative populations, I still don't see much breakage on 80s, even in this forum.

And did I just imagine you going through one (or two) steering racks? C'mon John, don't make me cull through old posts and hack `em up, `cause I know you love that!

Whether it breaks on the trail or in the Starbucks parking lot, it's still breakage.
 
No you won't. And given their relative populations, I still don't see much breakage on 80s, even in this forum.

And did I just imagine you going through one (or two) steering racks? C'mon John, don't make me cull through old posts and hack `em up, `cause I know you love that!

Whether it breaks on the trail or in the Starbucks parking lot, it's still breakage.

Neither steering rack broke. The topic was broke, breakage. Duh. One was given free due to some added play...new rack didn't help...turned out to be loose wheel bearings. The other leaked on a 700-mile trip. A weakness though so far only me.
 
Kevin: Are you REALLY going to argue about 100 vs 80 brakes!? That's an argument an 80 owner can't win. There's no comparison and you-all know it...unless you've never driven a 100. You know as well as me that decending some of these grades in AZ your ass is almost off the seat while your leg is hot on the brake pedal....especially after they get wet. They are WEAK!

The 100's brakes work effortlessly even with 35's. The system doesn't care. Come on Kev, I know you prefer 80's but we're talking brakes.

My son is 18....it was his choice to take the 80 or get something else. Isn't the choice his? We you a big boy when you were 18?

I wasn't arguing the difference between the two systems, only your BS claims;

...Same with brakes. 80's are simply dangerous...

OK....I'll rephrase:

80s brakes were worst in it's class...

Fact, the 80 brakes perform well against their class, generation vehicles and in good operating condition are far from your claim of "simply dangerous".:rolleyes:

I did a bunch of Moab trails in the record flood last fall and never felt the least bit out of control, in fact was loving the 80's brakes. Going through water halfway up the doors, then off the edge of domes and fins without issue. But my wheeling history includes a drum brake 40, so I guess it's a matter of perspective.:D
 
I wasn't arguing the difference between the two systems, only your BS claims;





Fact, the 80 brakes perform well against their class, generation vehicles and in good operating condition are far from your claim of "simply dangerous".:rolleyes:

I did a bunch of Moab trails in the record flood last fall and never felt the least bit out of control, in fact was loving the 80's brakes. Going through water halfway up the doors, then off the edge of domes and fins without issue. But my wheeling history includes a drum brake 40, so I guess it's a matter of perspective.:D

I hear ya Kev....though my OPINION stands. Me, Becky, my sons....we all believe the 80's brakes are dangerous. The system is so overburdened with larger tires and added weight. If you decended the same hills in my 100 you'd not believe the difference. You'd suddduppp next time. :D

Enough debated on this......video coming......until then, it's 5 o'clock somewhere. :D
 
1999 LC
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 150 ft.

1998 LC
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 140 ft.

Braking 60-0 mph: 135 feet (2005 model)

2003 LX470
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 124.24 ft.

1997 LX450
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 132 ft.

1996 LX450
60-0 mph stopping distance of 136 feet

2003 GX470
Braking, 60-0, ft: 131

FJ Cruiser
60 - 0 (ft):, 126.6
60-0 mph, 128 ft
 
John,

I lead a run this weekend with the Norcal guys. There were 3 stock rigs in the group. Two series and one 100 series. All Lexus vehicles.
The all did very well, they got over all the obstacles. However, the adjustable hydraulic lift on the 100 series failed in the middle of the trail. From one moment to the next the 100 series lost 3" of lift. It was a good thing that it happened right round the time we were about to turn around and return the way we came. It was all down hill.

Over the years, this is the 3rd time I've seen this happen. Does that make the 100 series a bad truck? Certainly not. But I from now on I'd be cautious to take a 100 series with a hydraulic lift on any trail that's more than a forest servie road.
The 100 series endured damage to it's bumpers and running boards because of the lack of height.

If you look at them with a lupe, all vehicles will have issues. On the 100 series, it seems to me that those issues are due to Toyota changing the purpose of the Land Cruiser. From a utilitarian vehicle, to one that defines luxury and refinement.

Alvaro

That sucks. My 06 LC has AHC. I didn't want it, but couldn't find one around here with out it. I was hoping that after several years in the Lexus the kinks would be worked out. Does anyone know how common failures are in the later models?
 
Neither steering rack broke. The topic was broke, breakage. Duh. One was given free due to some added play...new rack didn't help...turned out to be loose wheel bearings. The other leaked on a 700-mile trip. A weakness though so far only me.


OK, I stand corrected. The rack "only" leaked, and "only" necessitated a complete replacement (which you could not have done on the trail). See, I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong! :rolleyes:
 
RE: broken CV and front diff on ARB adventure.

Hey, I admitted I broke it, never said and 80 would have broken there.

You said if had it happened in the 80 it probably would have broken too. Sorry....you said it. :)

But again....who cares? It's ONE broken CV joint on all of MUD. :)
 
That sucks. My 06 LC has AHC. I didn't want it, but couldn't find one around here with out it. I was hoping that after several years in the Lexus the kinks would be worked out. Does anyone know how common failures are in the later models?


That's OK, if it ever breaks, it should be relatively easy to yank it all out and go with a traditional suspension!

Funny, I was in my fuse box last night, and saw an empty place that's labeled as "AHC." And I have empty threaded holes where the AHC pump would normally go. If I have the wiring harness to an empty ECU socket somewhere, maybe I can go against the grain and add the system! ;)
 
RE: broken CV and front diff on ARB adventure.

Hey, I admitted I broke it, never said and 80 would have broken there.


Is John making s#!t up again? SHOCKING!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom