Why the AHC hate?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

What? What are you mad about? You wanted opinions and got them. Don't start threads if you can't handle opinions that don't agree with yours.

Dude, I did not start this thread.

Here’s the quote from PADDO:
“Agreed, the hydraulic elements of this system are of very high quality and robustly engineered. Toyota didn’t skimp on this platform and it’s active suspension at all. Having spent close to three decades in military servo control/hydraulics and related fields I’d comfortably compare the overall quality of engineering design and build to mil spec equipments. It just needs a little basic routine maintenance, like any system.”

I’m not “believing” and “trusting” based on some warm feeling. It’s a matter of proven engineering. But yeah man, you’re still entitled to your opinion. Your opinion won’t affect facts.
 
That’s just it! It IS a dead nuts reliable system. It was developed for the Land Cruiser by Toyota, who knows what the LC is, what is expected of it... and who knows a thing or two about reliability. Which is precisely why there are so many reports on this site about AHC working flawlessly after 20 years and 250k miles. That is absolutely UNHEARD of in an adjustable suspension system.

And dead nuts reliable means what? Never fails ever ever? That doesn’t exist. The car is full of things that can fail and strand you and ruin a trip. Every car is. Dead nuts reliable compared to any other adjustable suspension system? Hell yes! Dead nuts reliable compared to a conventional setup? Even conventional struts rarely hold up for 200k+ miles. Cheap to replace as a conventional setup? Not if you’re replacing the entire system—but when and why would you ever need to do that? And you can service the system with used take-offs, which you cannot do with a conventional setup. When those fail, you replace them with new units. I will give you that conventional is simpler, but if simplicity is everything, I wonder why you’ve got such a new vehicle full of modern systems anyway, instead of an 80 or older.

And speaking of 80, with regards to downtravel—you’re already sacrificing downtravel in the 100 with the IFS.

But the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for most. I off-road my LX plenty, more than a lot of folks with beefier machines. I can keep up with some beasts. TBH, most of the built rigs are overkill for the kind of off-roading most of us are doing. By the way, a *stock* Land Cruiser is overkill for the kind of off-roading most of us are doing! But that’s part of the appeal.

But most of us also drive on the road, a fair bit. And, appearances aside, I would much rather drive around on road with a system that is lower at high-speed. Rollover risk is greatly reduced with AHC, not to mention the many systems that are integrated into it— anti-roll, anti-squat, etc. (Read more on this here: https://st.club-lexus.ru/attach/u/6b15e9be.pdf )

Tangent aside, to suggest that AHC relegates the 100 for on-road use only is kind of insane.

PS— I’ve said it before, I’ll repeat it here. Our resident AHC expert, PADDO, mentioned previously he has a history in military engineering (something along those lines). He reports Toyota’s AHC system as being “military-grade” robust. Let me also remind you that hydropneumatic systems are used in tanks. Tanks. You’re welcome.
It's a Citroen design
 
Good for you. Stop talking sht to people who are just here posting their experience with the system.
I provided some facts. You just sarcastically commented “glad you people trust and believe this system”. 🙄 You’re the sht talker, we can all see. But project all you want.
 
I provided some facts. You just sarcastically commented “glad you people trust and believe this system”. 🙄 You’re the sht talker, we can all see. But project all you want.
How do you know I was being sarcastic? And what facts did you provide besides the opinion of a forum member that believes and trusts this system lol?

The facts are, hundreds of people have had this system fail on them. Myself included. Doing routine maintenance and keeping the fluid clean doesn’t mean it will not fail. Report back when you’re a long ways from home and one of your height sensors fails.... then the whole “robust” theory gets thrown out the window.

Keep believing what you want to believe if it helps you sleep well at night.
 
Load the truck up with adult passengers and full of cargo, even without any “armor” weight and tell me how long before it goes into L mode on you. If you plan on bumpers, rack, RTT, sliders, winch... good luck.
 
Load the truck up with adult passengers and full of cargo, even without any “armor” weight and tell me how long before it goes into L mode on you. If you plan on bumpers, rack, RTT, sliders, winch... good luck.
Mine never has during the past 4 HIH events, even when towing a loaded down M416 trailer. I also have a rust free truck, flushed the fluid and adjusted the pressures with the load.
 
Mine never has during the past 4 HIH events, even when towing a loaded down M416 trailer. I also have a rust free truck, flushed the fluid and adjusted the pressures with the load.
I also have a rust free truck. Not sure what that has to do with this. My experience has been difference. And based on doing a quick forum search, I am not alone. My brother’s Lexus dealer has done dozens of these trucks with failed AHC. Most people just trade them in because repairs are so expensive. None of them ever offroad these trucks either.
 
Ya I like AHC. But on my 20 yr old LX, I didn't want it there.

Left me on bumpstops
$2600 to refresh the suspension. I spent it on Radflos
Can leak at shocks or lines
Not trail repairable
AHC pumps fail
 
And to the guy that thinks I’m hating on AHC. I am not. I loved that system on the street, when the truck was not loaded. It drove super smooth and it was fun to mess with the damping dial as well as lowering the vehicle for easy loading. But on more than one occasion it was acting up on us, both times far away from home and a loaded (apparently overloaded) vehicle. Not fun. Only good thing about it going into Low is that your highway MPG go through the roof!
 
I would but my wheeling requires a more reliable system
Cute.
It's a Citroen design
It was, originally, in 1954 or thereabouts. It’s not identical to that 65 year old suspension setup though, obviously. This version was designed by Toyota for the Land Cruiser.
How do you know I was being sarcastic? And what facts did you provide besides the opinion of a forum member that believes and trusts this system lol?

The facts are, hundreds of people have had this system fail on them. Myself included. Doing routine maintenance and keeping the fluid clean doesn’t mean it will not fail. Report back when you’re a long ways from home and one of your height sensors fails.... then the whole “robust” theory gets thrown out the window.

Keep believing what you want to believe if it helps you sleep well at night.
Ok, I’ll play along. Were you being sarcastic?

And again, guys... you’re telling me a convention suspension setup will never fail? Everything fails, eventually.

Reliability is not equal to invincibility.

Fact is, I’ve got over 250k miles and my system works flawlessly, and I’ve only ever had to throw a $300 take off pump at it in that time, plus fluids. Fact is, my truck has never dropped into LO (aside from aforementioned pump failure) despite being full of heavy gear, adults, towing. Fact is, a guy with 3 decades of military experience says it compares to military spec equipment. That is what is known as an “expert,” and yes, I do trust experts. I also provided this nice facty link https://st.club-lexus.ru/attach/u/6b15e9be.pdf

Ya I like AHC. But on my 20 yr old LX, I didn't want it there.

Left me on bumpstops
$2600 to refresh the suspension. I spent it on Radflos
Can leak at shocks or lines
Not trail repairable
AHC pumps fail
Dealer quoted $2600? They do that. Unlikely it was necessary.

A busted conventional shock is not trail repairable either.


Again, to each his own. There is nothing wrong with going to a conventional setup. But AHC is extremely robust and reliable (just because they can and do eventually break doesn’t change this. EVERYTHING fails eventually, including conventional shocks!) for those that are interested. They just don’t put cheap, breakable crap on the Land Cruiser.
 
Last edited:
I'm keeping mine until it breaks, because it drives like a cloud and friends/family always compliment on how well it feels and the insulation of the LX just adds to the great effect. The 2" instant lift is amazing, its not a rock crawler so its perfect amount for the type of places we like to go which is scenic back-roads with low to moderate difficulty to enjoy with the family. I like that i can turn the switch to sport all the way and it eats up dips like a champ! place it on comfort all the way and the kids fall asleep easy riding in that town car air suspension cloud haha!

If its something simple like AHC spheres or a line busts then I'll fix, if its the pump or gets over the 3k mark in one instance then I'd consider replacing for a nice suspension system or go to stock LC suspension at the minimum.
 
I'm keeping mine until it breaks, because it drives like a cloud and friends/family always compliment on how well it feels and the insulation of the LX just adds to the great effect. The 2" instant lift is amazing, its not a rock crawler so its perfect amount for the type of places we like to go which is scenic back-roads with low to moderate difficulty to enjoy with the family.

If its something simple like AHC spheres or a line busts then I'll fix, if its the pump or gets over the 3k mark in one instance then I'd consider replacing for a nice suspension system or go to stock LC suspension at the minimum.
FYI you can get a used pump for about $300 and replacement is super simple.
 
Don’t get what’s all the hate about, when we all know that Jeep > Toyota ;))
 
Just like everything else Land Cruiser. Now, stop hating and wheel your damn rig!
Who is hating?

This is exactly what I meant, lol. Every few months we have this thread, and it seems like these days it's made by someone randomly defending ACH, not attacking it.

I'll give you my 2 cents. I'm probably going to sell my RCF, and I'm thinking about getting a Cayenne. I used to own a Touareg and it was great all around vehicle - laughable off road compared to a built 100, but a good all around vehicle.

It had air suspension. I want air suspension if I buy a Cayenne. It's great for towing. Would I want a ACH on my LX? Nope, it's gone for a reason. But am I spending any time "hating on it"?

Come on man. Pretending people are hating on it in this forum seems like trolling.
 
Nobody is hating anything. Seems like the guy is just looking for confirmation about how bulletproof and easy/cheap his AHC system is, and it’s really not. Sure as hell not cheaper and easier to work on than conventional.... fact. Since you like facts.
 
Who is hating?

This is exactly what I meant, lol. Every few months we have this thread, and it seems like these days it's made by someone randomly defending ACH, not attacking it.

I'll give you my 2 cents. I'm probably going to sell my RCF, and I'm thinking about getting a Cayenne. I used to own a Touareg and it was great all around vehicle - laughable off road compared to a built 100, but a good all around vehicle.

It had air suspension. I want air suspension if I buy a Cayenne. It's great for towing. Would I want a ACH on my LX? Nope, it's gone for a reason. But am I spending any time "hating on it"?

Come on man. Pretending people are hating on it in this forum seems like trolling.

It was a joke.
 
Nobody is hating anything. Seems like the guy is just looking for confirmation about how bulletproof and easy/cheap his AHC system is, and it’s really not. Sure as hell not cheaper and easier to work on than conventional.... fact. Since you like facts.
I did NOT start this thread, fellas. I merely commented on it, same as the rest of you. And I already agreed that conventional suspension is simpler. You said nobody is hating, yet you’re being snarky with the “facts” bit, and incorrectly suggesting I started this for some confirmation about how great my suspension is. Wtf happened in this thread? My goodness.
 
Back
Top Bottom