What? What are you mad about? You wanted opinions and got them. Don't start threads if you can't handle opinions that don't agree with yours.Get a life
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
What? What are you mad about? You wanted opinions and got them. Don't start threads if you can't handle opinions that don't agree with yours.Get a life
What? What are you mad about? You wanted opinions and got them. Don't start threads if you can't handle opinions that don't agree with yours.
It's a Citroen designThat’s just it! It IS a dead nuts reliable system. It was developed for the Land Cruiser by Toyota, who knows what the LC is, what is expected of it... and who knows a thing or two about reliability. Which is precisely why there are so many reports on this site about AHC working flawlessly after 20 years and 250k miles. That is absolutely UNHEARD of in an adjustable suspension system.
And dead nuts reliable means what? Never fails ever ever? That doesn’t exist. The car is full of things that can fail and strand you and ruin a trip. Every car is. Dead nuts reliable compared to any other adjustable suspension system? Hell yes! Dead nuts reliable compared to a conventional setup? Even conventional struts rarely hold up for 200k+ miles. Cheap to replace as a conventional setup? Not if you’re replacing the entire system—but when and why would you ever need to do that? And you can service the system with used take-offs, which you cannot do with a conventional setup. When those fail, you replace them with new units. I will give you that conventional is simpler, but if simplicity is everything, I wonder why you’ve got such a new vehicle full of modern systems anyway, instead of an 80 or older.
And speaking of 80, with regards to downtravel—you’re already sacrificing downtravel in the 100 with the IFS.
But the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for most. I off-road my LX plenty, more than a lot of folks with beefier machines. I can keep up with some beasts. TBH, most of the built rigs are overkill for the kind of off-roading most of us are doing. By the way, a *stock* Land Cruiser is overkill for the kind of off-roading most of us are doing! But that’s part of the appeal.
But most of us also drive on the road, a fair bit. And, appearances aside, I would much rather drive around on road with a system that is lower at high-speed. Rollover risk is greatly reduced with AHC, not to mention the many systems that are integrated into it— anti-roll, anti-squat, etc. (Read more on this here: https://st.club-lexus.ru/attach/u/6b15e9be.pdf )
Tangent aside, to suggest that AHC relegates the 100 for on-road use only is kind of insane.
PS— I’ve said it before, I’ll repeat it here. Our resident AHC expert, PADDO, mentioned previously he has a history in military engineering (something along those lines). He reports Toyota’s AHC system as being “military-grade” robust. Let me also remind you that hydropneumatic systems are used in tanks. Tanks. You’re welcome.
I provided some facts. You just sarcastically commented “glad you people trust and believe this system”.Good for you. Stop talking sht to people who are just here posting their experience with the system.
I would but my wheeling requires a more reliable systemNow, stop hating and wheel your damn rig!
How do you know I was being sarcastic? And what facts did you provide besides the opinion of a forum member that believes and trusts this system lol?I provided some facts. You just sarcastically commented “glad you people trust and believe this system”.You’re the sht talker, we can all see. But project all you want.
Mine never has during the past 4 HIH events, even when towing a loaded down M416 trailer. I also have a rust free truck, flushed the fluid and adjusted the pressures with the load.Load the truck up with adult passengers and full of cargo, even without any “armor” weight and tell me how long before it goes into L mode on you. If you plan on bumpers, rack, RTT, sliders, winch... good luck.
I also have a rust free truck. Not sure what that has to do with this. My experience has been difference. And based on doing a quick forum search, I am not alone. My brother’s Lexus dealer has done dozens of these trucks with failed AHC. Most people just trade them in because repairs are so expensive. None of them ever offroad these trucks either.Mine never has during the past 4 HIH events, even when towing a loaded down M416 trailer. I also have a rust free truck, flushed the fluid and adjusted the pressures with the load.
Cute.I would but my wheeling requires a more reliable system
It was, originally, in 1954 or thereabouts. It’s not identical to that 65 year old suspension setup though, obviously. This version was designed by Toyota for the Land Cruiser.It's a Citroen design
Ok, I’ll play along. Were you being sarcastic?How do you know I was being sarcastic? And what facts did you provide besides the opinion of a forum member that believes and trusts this system lol?
The facts are, hundreds of people have had this system fail on them. Myself included. Doing routine maintenance and keeping the fluid clean doesn’t mean it will not fail. Report back when you’re a long ways from home and one of your height sensors fails.... then the whole “robust” theory gets thrown out the window.
Keep believing what you want to believe if it helps you sleep well at night.
Dealer quoted $2600? They do that. Unlikely it was necessary.Ya I like AHC. But on my 20 yr old LX, I didn't want it there.
Left me on bumpstops
$2600 to refresh the suspension. I spent it on Radflos
Can leak at shocks or lines
Not trail repairable
AHC pumps fail
FYI you can get a used pump for about $300 and replacement is super simple.I'm keeping mine until it breaks, because it drives like a cloud and friends/family always compliment on how well it feels and the insulation of the LX just adds to the great effect. The 2" instant lift is amazing, its not a rock crawler so its perfect amount for the type of places we like to go which is scenic back-roads with low to moderate difficulty to enjoy with the family.
If its something simple like AHC spheres or a line busts then I'll fix, if its the pump or gets over the 3k mark in one instance then I'd consider replacing for a nice suspension system or go to stock LC suspension at the minimum.
Who is hating?Just like everything else Land Cruiser. Now, stop hating and wheel your damn rig!
Who is hating?
This is exactly what I meant, lol. Every few months we have this thread, and it seems like these days it's made by someone randomly defending ACH, not attacking it.
I'll give you my 2 cents. I'm probably going to sell my RCF, and I'm thinking about getting a Cayenne. I used to own a Touareg and it was great all around vehicle - laughable off road compared to a built 100, but a good all around vehicle.
It had air suspension. I want air suspension if I buy a Cayenne. It's great for towing. Would I want a ACH on my LX? Nope, it's gone for a reason. But am I spending any time "hating on it"?
Come on man. Pretending people are hating on it in this forum seems like trolling.
I did NOT start this thread, fellas. I merely commented on it, same as the rest of you. And I already agreed that conventional suspension is simpler. You said nobody is hating, yet you’re being snarky with the “facts” bit, and incorrectly suggesting I started this for some confirmation about how great my suspension is. Wtf happened in this thread? My goodness.Nobody is hating anything. Seems like the guy is just looking for confirmation about how bulletproof and easy/cheap his AHC system is, and it’s really not. Sure as hell not cheaper and easier to work on than conventional.... fact. Since you like facts.