http://www.johnfjensen.com/Diesel_fuel_additive_test.pdf
Probably not the best study, but is independent and yields some interesting results. First result from the almighty Google...lol. A good follow-up study would be a random sampling of ULSD fuel from different fuel stations and different petroleum companies, and seeing what their scores are. It would also have been good to have more information about the study...as it is, we have to assume the veracity of the "article".
Looks like using two stroke oil is better in terms of lubricity than the Howe's that I've been using. I'm going to look at other products, for sure..."snake oil" or not. I'm on my way to work, but I'm sure with a little more effort more meaningful information can be found.
I understand that some of you have had exceptional experiences not running any fuel additives in your older diesel engines...but I'm not going to personally roll the dice and trust that the fuel I pump into my tank from the numerous service stations that I frequent will be treated adequately to keep my fuel system happy. The cost per tank of these fuel additives (most of them) are not significant enough to prevent me from using them. For example...if a person is complaining that adding 30-60 mls of Howe's Diesel Treat into their 85L tank from a $21CAD 1/2 Gallon bottle of additive is probably too much of a cheap b*stard to own an older Toyota turbo diesel...lol.
Anyway, this is purely a personal preference and I am in no way trying to convince those who refuse to use additives to start using them. I have no shares in any of those additive companies and there are no benefits for me...just my opinion.