blog on (part 2)
I have to Afghanistan. In many cases opium is the only cash crop a farmer can support his family on. The profits do not go to the farmer; rather the profits go to the export/import intermediates (Taliban or whoever) and to the rich addicted Western countries via the local distributors and our local gangsters. That article says rich farmers and corrupt gov’t officials are all in bed together on this. No doubt - look at Mexico and the blood baths and gov’t corruption down there
Take the profit out the illegality of drugs. It would be far cheaper for the West to pay opium farmers in Afghanistan not to grow opium and pay the equivalent to the illegal price of opium (legal price is lower). Put in a price support system that subsides wheat, which they should be growing, but don’t because of illegal opium is more profitable.
This would be cheaper than the misery (human waste, theft, policing, and burden on health care and social support), it costs the rich West. Western farmers are subsidized, why not the opium farmers in Afghanistan?
ah yes, but I suspect that some of those profits go to maintain the status quo. The government could solve this problem if the will was there, but it's obviously not.
globeandmail.com: Obama's men in Afghanistan
I have to Afghanistan. In many cases opium is the only cash crop a farmer can support his family on. The profits do not go to the farmer; rather the profits go to the export/import intermediates (Taliban or whoever) and to the rich addicted Western countries via the local distributors and our local gangsters. That article says rich farmers and corrupt gov’t officials are all in bed together on this. No doubt - look at Mexico and the blood baths and gov’t corruption down there
Take the profit out the illegality of drugs. It would be far cheaper for the West to pay opium farmers in Afghanistan not to grow opium and pay the equivalent to the illegal price of opium (legal price is lower). Put in a price support system that subsides wheat, which they should be growing, but don’t because of illegal opium is more profitable.
This would be cheaper than the misery (human waste, theft, policing, and burden on health care and social support), it costs the rich West. Western farmers are subsidized, why not the opium farmers in Afghanistan?


