The new series of ARB ads actually began under Henry's direction, but quite frankly had little to do with either one of us. ARB bought the ad space from Chris, and supplied us the ads to place in the magazine. Yes, this is a change from the past, but it wasn't the Trails staff (past or present) who made the decision -- it was ARB. The first new ad they placed was in the Jan/Feb, and it ran in the interior to accommodate Henry's front and back cover concept. Red 70 series featured, and I don't recall whether there is a non-Toyota seen in that ad or not. I guess Chris could have said to ARB, sorry, we're Toyotas only, but I can promise you we would have immediately lost their business (or at least their business would have reverted to the less lucrative, 1/2 page interior ad). And I suppose I could have told Chris to tell them we wouldn't run the ad, but with the same results. Trails is an extremely small magazine in most respects, and as such we're not always calling the shots, within reason. If Chris comes to me and has an ad that defiles Toyota, or is simply not Toyota related in any way, sure I'll say no. But ARB is a long time supporter of Trails, and had just become even more committed to us by buying the higher dollar ad. I just don't have enough of an issue with those tiny Jeep images to think it warrants pulling the ad.
One more thing. I don't expect I can make everybody happy all the time. But I will listen to what everybody says all the time. It's your magazine, if you don't like it, let me know and I'll do everything I can to remedy the situation. But bear in mind that there are often multiple factors at play, so one opinion doesn't always entirely influence the decision.
I'll talk to American Web about the ink on the cover.  

idn't happen to me, maybe the ink density is varying a bit, but that can be resolved.
Onward.
TJK