Yes I'm around...
Did a quick read since my absence. I haven't forgotten the importance of it all (tongue in cheek). I've sent it off to two engineer buddies, one at Ball aerospace, one that teaches applied engineering here in chicago. I'm also working on drawing it to scale, so we can see what differences exactly we speak to. And just *maybe*, what rises from all this, is an accurate working front suspension model to use for our 80's (my primary goal in staying in this). Not sure I have a lot of interest in much else, given the digression of the thread.
I already got asked for the definition of articulation. The formulas I presented appear correct, so technically are the arcs (given the centerlines). There are several mistatements throughout the thread, and the initial feedback is that mine is ok as presented, albeit oversimplified.
This appears to have a lot of interest. I'll let y'all know what I find. I'm not interested in more flames...
As a side note, I went to the Chicago Public High School Regional Science Fair last weekend, at which several briliant young minds presented doctorate level papers with much higher levels of accuracy and applied physics than a bunch of 80 drivers could muster. My daughter btw, moved onto the Illinois Julnior Science Fair State Finals as an 8th grader. No reflection on her father, for that I'm sure...
Peace all,
Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning