bloc
SILVER Star
I would just find the right size spacer and push that bushing out before the welding. Visible damage like that is definitely going to impact durability.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
where did you cut the OEM arm? In my head, cutting near the frame end is better and if you're going to weld on the ends anyway, just cutting an end off then sleeving seems like the way to go. If you are not going to remove the OEM bushings, cutting closer to the frame end would at least put the cut in a place that isn't the middle of the arm where it is likely to bend but you still need the arm to work in tension so the sleeve has to have enough spot welds to accomplish this.Yes, there was a little bit of heat damage. Should have slowed down and let them cool, but we were being impatient. We'll see how long those bushings hold up.
With all of the people that have done this, I think there would be more cautionary tales if it didn't work. One of our metallurgists could probably provide good information, but I suspect that the sleeve takes over the responsibility for rigidity and resistance to bending, and the cut stock part is mostly for alignment.where did you cut the OEM arm? In my head, cutting near the frame end is better and if you're going to weld on the ends anyway, just cutting an end off then sleeving seems like the way to go. If you are not going to remove the OEM bushings, cutting closer to the frame end would at least put the cut in a place that isn't the middle of the arm where it is likely to bend but you still need the arm to work in tension so the sleeve has to have enough spot welds to accomplish this.
Yes, I agree that the cut in half the sleeve must work. It for sure results in an arm that is stronger than the OEM one. All I am saying is that cutting it means you are now only relying on the sleeve to resist bending, at least at the point of the cut. If you can sleeve it and end up with the ORM tube and the sleeve welded to the bushing housing then you get the strength of both tubes. Do you need that and is it worth the effort? IDK but over engineering to me is like mud to a pig. I like it.With all of the people that have done this, I think there would be more cautionary tales if it didn't work. One of our metallurgists could probably provide good information, but I suspect that the sleeve takes over the responsibility for rigidity and resistance to bending, and the cut stock part is mostly for alignment.
Also, if you take your time and stitch then let cool, rotate the part, stitch then let cool, etc., I suspect you can weld the circumference without putting a lot of heat into the bushing.
A continuous bead is bound to put a ton of heat into the workpiece.
I've done the stitch technique with seam welding a vehicle and that worked great to minimize the amount of heat in the work piece.
, but I suspect that the sleeve takes over the responsibility for rigidity and resistance to bending, and the cut stock part is mostly for alignment.
It stalled the press? Or was it an issue of being able to get forces applied to the thin edges of the sleeve?With a 20 ton press, I couldn't press the stock bushings out. I had to cut them out.
OEM Tube | OEM Tube | Solid Round Bar | Solid rectangle | Larger DOM tube (Sleeve) | Larger DOM tube (Sleeve) | OEM Tube | |
OD/h | 1.3563 | 1.3563 | 1.3563 | 1.3563 | 1.7500 | 1.7500 | 1.3563 |
ID/w | 0.9813 | 0.9813 | 1.3563 | 1.3740 | 1.3740 | 0.9813 | |
Ix | 0.121 | 0.121 | 0.166 | 0.282 | 0.285 | 0.285 | 0.121 |
Relative I | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.0 |
Additional bar added to bottom | |||||||
h | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
w | 1.75 | 1.35 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.25 | ||
I | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.013 | ||
d (A2 distance from RLCA axis) | 0.928 | 0.803 | 1.000 | 1.125 | 0.928 | ||
Axis adjustment (A2D^2) | 0.754 | 0.218 | 0.438 | 1.107 | 0.538 | ||
Ix | 0.893 | 0.340 | 0.725 | 1.411 | 0.672 | ||
Relative I | 5.4 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 11.7 | 4.0 |
Very nice! If you can provide the detailed dimensions for the “skid plate”, I’ll run some numbers on the area moment of inertia/ section modulus. My guess is your design is stronger against bending that the typical sleeve approach.Got my parts for my lower arms.
View attachment 2857673
View attachment 2857674
View attachment 2857676
Yeah, that would be cool. I'll PM you the exact dimensions tomorrow and send you a set for your own, for your work. Good info on the material choice. I live in the desert so no rust issues for me.Very nice! If you can provide the detailed dimensions for the “skid plate”, I’ll run some numbers on the area moment of inertia/ section modulus. My guess is your design is stronger against bending that the typical sleeve approach.
Also stainless is a good choice for general rusting caused by scrapes on rocks but 304 is not so great against chlorides (salt). 316 is better for that. If you are in the rust belt, you may want to paint the skids. If chloride attack happens, it will show up as pitting on the surface.
Why not just tack weld some 1 inch by 3/8 wall angle on the bottom of the LCA and be done? i have seen that work very well.