I’m not forgetting. What did you think the stove bolt 6 comment was for?
Putting a date on a design is hugely relevant to its effectiveness. Th 2f is a ancient tractor motor. It can’t be made to rev. It can’t make horsepower. It gets terrible mileage and emissions. Comparing a 2f to anything modern in a positive way is just having nasalgic blinders on. It’s old tech. Do you think engine tech hasn’t advanced in 75 years?
A gen 3 motor out of the box is 300 hp, 300k reliable. A 350 would need to be built to get there and would never be anywhere close to as reliable. Gen 3 has been made for 30 years now. There are parts everywhere. Tons of aftermarket. And they can be had used for $300. You can’t build a 350 to make 300 hp for $300. A cam and stock ls3 intake and you’re 400 hp without trying.
I love the 350. I’ve had many. It is what it is. It’s a good engine that is way past it’s sell by date.
I think the point I was trying to make is getting lost. I again agree that a LS engine IS SUPERIOR to the gen 1 small block, my point is the gen 1 small block is still a very reasonable engine upgrade option in a FJ40 for someone looking to get rid of their original or missing motor.
The nostalgia comment is confusing though, because isn't one of the main reason to own a FJ40 rooted in nostalgia? to me this is a big reason to own any 70's 4x4.
That same logic would say that a brand new 4x4 is 'superior' so why do we all gravitate to these old rigs?
I guess it's worth mentioning I don't drive my FJ40 daily. It's more of a weekend toy