We're considering selling our '99 K1500, GMC, 94k and replacing it with a '94 Land Cruiser. Any thoughts/opinions on the LC vs. the Sub?
The 'Cruiser has 173k miles, loaded options, owners are good friends who bought it new and have had everything Toyota recommends done as far as service goes, virtually all service at the dealer. Never had any major issues with it, just regular maintenance stuff and normal wear&tear. They will sell to me for roughly Trade-in value ($6000), so seems like a good bargain.
Reasons for getting rid of Sub are mainly due to large size. It's primarily my wifes vehicle, I only drive on weekends. We have a 4-yr old and one more on the way in January, so don't really need the huge amount of room (which was one of original reasons for purchasing). I know the 'Cruiser won't be any better on fuel around town, and only slightly so on the highway.
My primary concern with te LC would be mileage, especially on the tranny.
Thanks for your opinions...
The 'Cruiser has 173k miles, loaded options, owners are good friends who bought it new and have had everything Toyota recommends done as far as service goes, virtually all service at the dealer. Never had any major issues with it, just regular maintenance stuff and normal wear&tear. They will sell to me for roughly Trade-in value ($6000), so seems like a good bargain.
Reasons for getting rid of Sub are mainly due to large size. It's primarily my wifes vehicle, I only drive on weekends. We have a 4-yr old and one more on the way in January, so don't really need the huge amount of room (which was one of original reasons for purchasing). I know the 'Cruiser won't be any better on fuel around town, and only slightly so on the highway.
My primary concern with te LC would be mileage, especially on the tranny.
Thanks for your opinions...