JL,
I have a plan, and this is up to you to try and figure out.
In the FSM, there are resistance values to check the primary rack position sensor. There is a specified range that is acceptable. Since this is an external test, it only gives the resistance value for when the rack is in the fully closed (engine off) position.
Can you please check the same pins, but slide the rack through its range and report the changes in resistance? I am curious if one of them is an on/off switch or closed/open or not, and how the values change throughout the travel (linear or not)
We can't simply move the sensor within the housing to change the values, since it would effect the low load fueling.
But we might be able to add some resistors in parallel/series to the sensor outputs, fooling the ECU into thinking the rack has not traveled as far as it actually has, giving a higher max fuel capability.
See attached picture...
I have a plan, and this is up to you to try and figure out.
In the FSM, there are resistance values to check the primary rack position sensor. There is a specified range that is acceptable. Since this is an external test, it only gives the resistance value for when the rack is in the fully closed (engine off) position.
Can you please check the same pins, but slide the rack through its range and report the changes in resistance? I am curious if one of them is an on/off switch or closed/open or not, and how the values change throughout the travel (linear or not)
We can't simply move the sensor within the housing to change the values, since it would effect the low load fueling.
But we might be able to add some resistors in parallel/series to the sensor outputs, fooling the ECU into thinking the rack has not traveled as far as it actually has, giving a higher max fuel capability.
See attached picture...