Thought I would add my thoughts to the IFS debate you folks seem to be having. First the pic above of the desert racer is application specific and works well in that enviroment, but not as well in rockcrawling.
IFS in stock form (or even in that desert racing form) doesn't lend itself well in highly articluated situations. Its because of the design the traction is less in high articluation as the arms try to keep the tire in its camber. IFS would do well in straight or v climbs tho, but not substantially better than solid axle.
Do I think that IFS could do well in rockcrawling...Maybe in some situations, but not in others as noted in my comments. I have had thoughts of trying to address the concern with being able to change camber live and may someday play with that.
You may see more IFS in the future as rockcawlers try to lower CG and the axles start preventing that, but it will take a highly modifies arm system to be effective.
IFS in stock form (or even in that desert racing form) doesn't lend itself well in highly articluated situations. Its because of the design the traction is less in high articluation as the arms try to keep the tire in its camber. IFS would do well in straight or v climbs tho, but not substantially better than solid axle.
Do I think that IFS could do well in rockcrawling...Maybe in some situations, but not in others as noted in my comments. I have had thoughts of trying to address the concern with being able to change camber live and may someday play with that.
You may see more IFS in the future as rockcawlers try to lower CG and the axles start preventing that, but it will take a highly modifies arm system to be effective.