Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
rockyklg said:hey all,
gas is just over 3.20 a gallon here in the SF bay area and i just wanted to share a few links i found.
first what seems to be an original of sorts. of course he died before his time. crudely written but i cant find any problems with the plans.
http://www.hasslberger.com/tecno/hydrogen.html
second someone trying to make a buck on the same basic principal.
http://www.savefuel.ca/
granted the corrosion is a problem and i am thinking there is a good way to setup a bifuel system using cella's basic plans ( redundency, simplicity, and mainetenance) instead of going all stainless and pure hydrogen.
i for one, am going to find out, and hopefully others will too...
oh and just as a preemptive to any conservation of energy nay sayers: (from http://www.able2know.com/forums/about26695-0-asc-20.html )
The problem is discussing this subject is that most of us get so wound up in our underlying belief systems that we fail to observe the obvious or check the science.
Beliefs such as "if it were true, scientists would have proved it so" or "free energy must exist" or "you can't get more out than you put in so it can't exist, conservation of energy and all that......"
Fact No.1 By definition "Free energy" is an energy source where man puts in less energy into a system than he gets out, usually by tapping into a cycle of nature.
Fact No.2 The conservation of energy does state that energy change from one form to another. The energy in the wood you burn on a fire gets converted to heat. The wood does not get recycled back into wood, seedlings or any other form of wood derivative. All you get is carbon and heat. Once the heat is used, you can't get it back. All you have is a bit a small amount of carbon dust. This is called using it up.
Fact No.3 You may recall of a man called Archie Blue. He built a device to extract hydrogen and oxygen from water through electrolysis, an process we did as experiments at high school.
Fact No.4 He demonstrated to the British Royal Auto Club on the Island of Guernsey in 1977. the BRAC attested to the fact that he there was no sleight of hand or trick, and that it did work and that he was getting approximately 100mpg on water, from a current of 2 or 3 amps from a car battery.
Fact No.5 I have tried various experiments myself and had actually met Archie and discussed his invention.
Fact No.6 The concept that a water/hydrogen powered car could not work because of conservation of energy is bollocks. This would only not work if you were expecting all the water and electricity back that you used to create the oxygen and hydrogen in the first place.
For every litre of water that went into Archie's device and engine, less than a litre of water came out the exhaust pipe. Why ? Because the energy contained in the missing water went into heat, just as the burnt wood went into heat.
Fact No. 7 Water is a source of energy, just like the coal in the ground, or the timber in the trees. Man taps into a cycle of nature and puts in less energy than he gets out. And scientists tell you that there is enough energy in a glass of water to power the Queen Mary across the Atlantic.
Take petrol for example. If we apply the same flawed argument about the water energy to petrol, we wouldn't have a petrol engine. Why ?
Well to drill for oil, transport oil, and refine oil, we need ...... guess what ? Oil, diesel, and petrol.......shyte...
Blind use of "Conservation of energy" dictates that we never get out more than we put in, so it will take more oil and diesel & petrol to run the oil rigs, refinerys, ocean going oil tankers, and delivery tankers than we could ever get out by burning the fuel. But clearly this does take place.
Oil has latent energy in it, so does wood, and water and so on. All we are doing is using it.
Fact No.8 Using Fact No.1 definition, Coal, wood, and oil are all examples of "Free Energy", but the biggest source of free energy is Hydro-electricity. Every time we turn on a light switch we are tapping into nature.
Fact No.9 Just because something is "Free Energy" does not mean it will cost nothing. Someone has to dig it up, process, or put it into a commercial form, the only problems occur when a particular group want to keep a monopoly on a particular energy production and therefore allow ideas to be circulated that prevent alternative or competitive forms of energy being promoted.
have at it.![]()
Advent said:Frankly, with the way most countries have fxxxed around the oil companies, I wouldn't be surprised if they're secretly the biggest champions of alternative fuels.
I've noticed that the largest fleet of alternative fuel vehicles in this state are owned by the oil companies, for what it's worth.
rockyklg said:is that your educated and experienced opinion, or just cause you say so>?
NocalFJ60 said:http://www.savefuel.ca/
This site is nothing but a scam..and yes this is my educated and experienced opinion.![]()
But please don't believe me and order up and kit and show me how good of mileage you get once you order it and install it. Looks like they have a money back guarantee so you should be safe? right?
Yes there is some truth to using hydrogen to power a car but with a system like this using electrolysis you will get no usable amount of hydrogen to improve performance.
Goodluck
roscoFJ73 said:is that your educated and experienced opinion, or just cause you say so>?
Seriously ,do you think its all part of a conspiracy to stop us having cheap affordable power by the carmakers and oil corporations?
The facts 1-9 that you listed are your beliefs and not that factual.
This is particuarly true with number 9
Are there Matrix style agents going around killing off inventions before they reach the public?
Please get a working example into prototype stage and come back and show it to us and dont tell anyone else![]()