Heritage vs base REAR springs - HE & 2020 base owners, could use your help

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

bloc

SILVER Star
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Threads
142
Messages
15,045
Location
Central Texas
Hello all,

You may have noticed some discussion on the rear of 2020 HE 200s seeming a bit higher than their base siblings. At first people assumed this was due to the removal of the third row and necessary hardware (3 seatbelts, folded seat anchors, etc), but @Eric Sarjeant eventually confirmed with side-by-side measurements that the coils are actually different in this post: How low can you go on a BP-51 suspension?

Stock 2020 base coils measure 18" on the bench, HE 18-7/8".

Here are the part numbers:
HE SPRINGS - 48231-60E50 RH 48231-60E40 LH
Base 48231-60A20 RH 48231-60B11 LH

So it's not just the weight. Then, someone I'd like to give credit to but can't find the post, noticed in a picture that there might be extra coil wraps on those springs.

My question is whether these HE springs are just taller, or maybe higher, or even lower, spring rate.

I requested someone measure the wrap count and wire diameter and @LBridges came through with numbers from his Heritage. 16.3mm and 6 coils. Thanks.. but part of why I'm tagging you here is I need more info.

ALSO good catch on noticing that the HE coils are used overseas on 200s with the aux fuel tank. I know people might assume this also makes them heavier duty, but we haven't established whether maybe aux tank trucks don't have a third row, and technically an aux tank would be lighter than a third row full of passengers.

I got under my 2013 and took some measurements.. my stock coils are 17.5mm, and depending on how you count them I have 4.25 wraps "free". That's a key distinction.. the only part of a coil spring wrap that counts is one that isn't supported by either another coil hitting it, or the spring perch.

That got me thinking even if we get the wire and coil specs, we need height numbers, and conditions when we measure that. I'm not sure my 2013 with likely sagged coils is a good benchmark for "base" model.. so the following is what we need from a new stock unloaded 2020 base (preferably minus the third row), and a 2020 HE

-Wire diameter
-Number of unsupported coil wraps.. count down from the last place the top open coil is supported. To the nearest .25 is good enough.
-Average of left and right distance from the axle tube to the bump stop on the frame. I'll attach a picture. We need to average this to account for potential KDSS lean. I believe this to be the best spot to measure ride height.. as going to the fender lip is difficult to nail down due to the shape.

With these we should be able to determine whether the HE coil is actually higher rate or just longer.



Thanks for any help people

Take your axle tube to bump stop measurement as seen on the right of this photo:
FAA57740-5D9B-4EB3-A8CB-3AA44650887D.jpeg


These pictures are up the spring, first showing the top seat and last point of contact at about 1oclock. The second is the whole spring, showing 4.25 wraps (roughly) counting down from that last point.

D59A51C7-D80E-417B-9DB1-70CB1920C860.jpeg


1E4F41AF-C1EC-412B-8A61-1F8308186679.jpeg
 
Last edited:
One additional thought, though it is a bit of an ask. Rear axle weight would be really useful for this comparison.

Also I just did a little digging in the EPC to satisfy some curiosity.

When comparing rear spring part numbers between my 2013 and a 2019 (latest model year in my program).. the Right rear spring changed part numbers (2013: 48231-60F31, 2019: 48231-60A20), but the Left rear didn't! (48231-60B11)

Did the Right side of the vehicle get lighter/heavier but the left stayed the same? or maybe this is an improvement to account for increased sag?
 
Do we have cases of early LC200 sagging on its own weight due to aging weak springs ?? Is this a problem with earlier LCs?
 
Do we have cases of early LC200 sagging on its own weight due to aging weak springs ?? Is this a problem with earlier LCs?

I haven’t heard much about 200s specifically but older coil spring toyota SUVs had a habit of doing it, and with Toyota’s standards even if it’s minor I could imagine them tweaking things through a vehicle generation’s life cycle.
 
I haven’t heard much about 200s specifically but older coil spring toyota SUVs had a habit of doing it, and with Toyota’s standards even if it’s minor I could imagine them tweaking things through a vehicle generation’s life cycle.

Yeah, i heard that a lot with 4runners...just wondering about LCs.
 
So are you just looking to upgrade your springs? Why wouldn’t you just order some aftermarket springs that have the height and spring rate readily available? My HE OEM springs are in a landfill somewhere so I’m no help. Just trying to figure what you are looking to accomplish.
 
So are you just looking to upgrade your springs? Why wouldn’t you just order some aftermarket springs that have the height and spring rate readily available? My HE OEM springs are in a landfill somewhere so I’m no help. Just trying to figure what you are looking to accomplish.

I am looking to give people options. I haven’t priced aftermarket springs but OE aren’t very expensive, and could potentially be offered very cheap as people upgrade their HE models.

Also I believe toyota makes a higher quality product than any of the aftermarket vendors.

At the end of the day these may offer people another unique option of rate and height.. this thread is an attempt to figure out if that is the case.
 
Subscribed and looking for a set of HE springs, I like the idea of getting a little extra height in the rear to accommodate for aux tank sag.
 
Also looking for a set HE springs.

My plan is adding the benefit of the OE spacer up front and HE springs in the rear and keeping stock goodness.

Already sourced the front spacer and just started soaking the KDSS valves hoping to break them loose.

Any other recommendations for a suspension “refresh” for my 2013?
 
You guys still have your third rows?

I'm thinking we should figure out whether the HE springs are actually a higher rate before we go throwing them into vehicles that might have the weight of passengers over the rear axle.

At least so far base springs are a thicker diameter wire, as well as less wraps, which would suggest they are higher rate.

This is also making me realize the rear sway bar might not be the same either.

Any Heritage owners able to get us that diameter? @LBridges maybe?
 
For me, after thinking about it (and since i like to keep stock suspension), i will pass on HE springs. I just see Toyota doing everything for a reason. Mixing and matching even among stock vehicle of different configuration may not be wisest IF you like stock ride/handling/safety etc.. That's just my conservative self though.
 
You guys still have your third rows?

I'm thinking we should figure out whether the HE springs are actually a higher rate before we go throwing them into vehicles that might have the weight of passengers over the rear axle.

At least so far base springs are a thicker diameter wire, as well as less wraps, which would suggest they are higher rate.

This is also making me realize the rear sway bar might not be the same either.

Any Heritage owners able to get us that diameter? @LBridges maybe?

I just came back in from measuring with my cheapo Harbor Freight digital caliper: Springs: 16.4mm; rear sway bar 26.1mm.

However, my HF caliper is now on it's way to caliper heaven (Brevard County landfill) so I wouldn't bet the house on my numbers.

Without a lift it's pretty hard to get a good look at the springs. But with wheels on ground and a full tank of gas I'd say I have about 4-1/4 spring coils that are not touching a perch, or bound with each other at the perch.

Edit for 3rd row: Based on a search of an Australian LC forum (LCOOL.org) it seems the VX model, post 2010, had the optional tank but only with a 3rd row. However, the GX model, which (I think) doesn't have a 3rd row also has the optional tank. I have looked on toyodiy.com and can't figure out how to properly cross reference models to see how the part numbers Eric provided fit in the scheme.
 
Last edited:
No 3rd row here. If HE springs aren’t higher rate then I could do new base springs possibly with trim packer in the rear to maintain rake.
 
Just checked with my (one of the best gifts I've ever been given) Mitutoyo solar calipers.. 2013 base coils are definitely 17.5, and the sway bar is 25.2

So with similar wraps but a thicker wire, it would appear base model coils are actually higher spring rate than HE rears. We should probably get someone with a 2020 base to confirm.. but at least one of their coils should be the same as mine.

Which I think rules out HE coils for my use.. as I'm finding stock coils to be a bit soft for my setup. Though I'm not sure how much of that is from 7 years and 150k miles.



2019 base model sway bar is the same part number (48805-60110) as my 2013.. so at least for 2019 base models they have a thinner bar than you are measuring @LBridges

Maybe @Eric Sarjeant can do a little digging and determine whether the HE has a different rear bar part number than a base model? He did say he was getting some new in box base and HE coils to compare dimensions on the bench.
 
I forget your load configuration, but for me, the OME 2721 have been an awesome upgrade from factory stock (~$200)
 
I forget your load configuration, but for me, the OME 2721 have been an awesome upgrade from factory stock (~$200)

That was the initial choice if I go to king 2.5s.. but I haven't done a lot of digging on that yet.
 
Okay... whoo, tired but trying to help with limited time.

Swapped some HE springs into a stock ‘18 and it dropped the rear end down about 1/5”. I think HE springs are lighter for not having the rear seats in from the factory.

I didn’t have Bud’s calipers at the time and had to switch back so I didn’t get measurements. But I have another HE coming in a week or two and can measure.

For the, non scientific method. Every time I get a HE in, they look lower. Where non-HEs look more rear end up. Also, the older the 200, the more rear end up look it has. ‘18 and newer looks very low in the rear compared to a stock 2008-2011s. And I know, I know there’s only been a few part number changes. But as 200s get newer, they get more of a difference of height between the rear left and right springs heights.

This is only what I’ve noticed from pulling springs with various age and mileage on them. So take this with a grain of salt.
 
Last edited:
Came across this thread researching solutions for my kdss lean on my 2014. No additional weight with the 3rd row the drivers side was sitting 1.5” lower than passenger side. I added a 15mm spacer from cruiser outfitters which obviously raised it 1/2” but it’s still pretty noticeable. I’m curious if the passenger side spring is a little taller than the drivers side. If so I’m thinking maybe adding a passenger spring with the spacer would get me into spec. Can anyone confirm the passenger side is a taller spring?
 
I can't say unequivocally, but I recall reading the passenger/driver rear springs are different.

Also, spring sag is a legit thing. We see it in the autocross stuff often. Super competitive people will specifically look for high mileage used springs which are sagged and give better instant turn in/camber. That said, 1.5" is a lot. If you bought this used, I would be going over everything with a microscope - any worn out bushings, anything replaced and not tightened down or installed properly, etc
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom