Regadless of what jeep owners may say (I d.d. a MJ and the wife drives a ZJ

) the 93 Cruiser was the first real vehicle that deserved the title Rubicon. Selectable lockers took till when to come on a heep? And how long before the Wrangler had coils on all four corners (97) when cruisers started in 90-91?? Oh wait they did have the ZJ in 93 with coils all around but they forgot one small thing.....a FRAME. I tell my boss who is a die hard jeep fanatic with a tj that you take ANY jeep they made in 94 and put it up against my stock 80 and I will win hands down. FZJ80's FTW
You know, Jeep people are not obsessed about claiming how they are better than Toyotas the way Toyota people are obsessed with claiming superiority with Jeeps. Some are of course, but Toyota people seem obsessed with being better than Jeeps. Who cares?
People need to stop saying that stock 80's will outperform all Jeeps. The sole reason the 80 performs so well with moderate modifications is because it has dual lockers if you are lucky enough to have that option. It isn't because it is built better, it isn't because of coil springs, it isn't because of Toyota. It is because of factory dual lockers.
If you take any of the XJ/ZJ/WJ family and upgrade the axles for strength and with dual ARBs you will go
anywhere a similarly modified 80 series Land Cruiser will go. And a lot of places it won't due to size and weight issues, and you won't be dragging around a ridiculously low hanging frame the entire time, either.
The only thing you have to do to the Jeep unibody subframe mount structures is reinforce a few of the mounts, and you get all the benefits of major extra clearance. Everytime you hear that nice slamming of metal underbody on rocks, think about how lucky you are to have that 80 series frame and it's low hanging rear control arm mounts.
I ran Spike in an XJ on 31's with nothing but a useless factory limited slip. In my 80, I needed both lockers on in some of the same really step climb spots because it is so heavy, and this was on 35's with much lower gearing.
Now, I love my 80. The 80 is a far superior dual purpose rig to any Jeep SUV. It doesn't have wimpy axles or a crappy chain driven transfer case, and it is remarkably competent for its size as a rock crawler. You can put on 35's without wearing out all of the front end components every six months, add a small lift, gear it, and wheel it. You can also do this in a Jeep, but outside of the jk's, you are going to be forklift upgrading your axles and probably your transfer case, and it still won't be as dual purpose balanced as an 80.
The problem I have with these threads is by the "heeps suck" logic, 100% of other Toyotas are also junk, because if you don't dual lock them you can forget about having a serious trail rig (they can be good, but dual locked is always the game changer). Take any Land Cruiser with open diffs on a hardcore trail and they are going to suck. 60's and 40's break all the time, when I am on runs with them I try to ensure I am ahead of them because you know it's coming.
Enjoy your truck, the 80 is such a solid platform. It doesn't have to be better than everything else as some silly badge of honor. It just has to be right for you.