80s were around 40k new. That's ~90k today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
That’s fair. I too found the 4Runner and Tacoma to be unsightly at first both inside and out. But like many other times before I’ve warmed up to the styling. Now I think the 6th Gen just looks like a modern take on the classic 4Runner. Oddly enough while the 550 is an improvement in regards to Lexus styling I’ve grown cold on the front and rear end.
We had a Quick Look at a ‘25 4R today at a local dealer. Back seat is smaller than the 250s, and the rear cargo area on the 4R (ORP Hybrid) was ridiculous. I thought the 250 was low in the back with the battery, but the 4R is about 4-5” lower. My dogs couldn’t even stand up back there. I did Iike the styling a bit better seeing it standing still, but I’m still 100% happy to have bought the 1958.250 with round headlights is the quintessential retro/modern look which I think will age well.
I’ve had my share of those things too. K5s with 305 4 speed, Sub with 350/350, Broncos with 351m, F250 with 300 straight 6 and 5 speed, countless 7.3 (all flavors) and 7.5s both ZF5 and E4OD, Cummins both stick and auto. All of them great trucks in their own ways, and nightmares in others. It is now, and always will be the nature of the beasts. Unless you do a total custom that combines the best of all worlds. My current project (aside from the old Taco and Sequoia daily drivers) is a ‘94 Bronco with a 302. It’s close…Very true. But even a Suburban was around 10 seconds 0-60 and a Blazer was around 8.5. IIRC my old '71 Suburban was still significantly faster just by memory of the 350/TH350 combo in around a 4k lb vehicle of that era. Looking back at that era is so interesting now. The Suburban had 9 different gas engine options. Including some really oddball stuff like a big block v6. Almost 5 liters displacement at the same time they also had a 4.8L inline 6 and a 5.0L v8. Why did that make sense?
I did have an F250 way back with the 6.9 IDI diesel. For the unfamiliar - that's a NON-turbo diesel and my god was it slow. Cranked out a bone crushing 170hp. Probably right on par with an JF80 in a drag race. Haha. And it was so loud that you had to turn it off at a drive through to order. And then cross your fingers that it would start again. Not sure much has changed in 40 years about that second part.
My 1972 C10 (rig I drove in high school) and the 350/5.7L with 8.5:1 compression, 175 horsepower, and 290 ft/lbs of torque! It was pretty gutless stock but became a lot better with a cam, aluminum intake, and headers on it. Still, I am pretty sure my 2UZ-FE makes way more power than it ever did. The 350 stayed pretty gutless all the way up until the 255 hp Vortecs came out in 1996, which were known as the "fast" truck in my high school parking lot (especially the SWB, standard cab models with the 5.7 Vortec and a 5-speed manual). But even Vortec 350 power was basically the same as a VVTI 2UZ-FE.Very true. But even a Suburban was around 10 seconds 0-60 and a Blazer was around 8.5. IIRC my old '71 Suburban was still significantly faster just by memory of the 350/TH350 combo in around a 4k lb vehicle of that era. Looking back at that era is so interesting now. The Suburban had 9 different gas engine options. Including some really oddball stuff like a big block v6. Almost 5 liters displacement at the same time they also had a 4.8L inline 6 and a 5.0L v8. Why did that make sense?
I did have an F250 way back with the 6.9 IDI diesel. For the unfamiliar - that's a NON-turbo diesel and my god was it slow. Cranked out a bone crushing 170hp. Probably right on par with an JF80 in a drag race. Haha. And it was so loud that you had to turn it off at a drive through to order. And then cross your fingers that it would start again. Not sure much has changed in 40 years about that second part.
80s were around 40k new. That's ~90k today.
What I loved about my 5th gen 4R and would also fit the 6th and LC250 is the range of functions. It's something you can jump in and do 1,000 mile highway trip to some cool place and still tackle 90% of the offroad range of the side by side or LC40, with heated seats, confidence going out alone, and ability to have a conversation with your passengers. And can haul enough gear to camp a few days. None of my other toys I've had can do that. My Tundra can't really either because it's not so great on the trails.
The side by side is fun in its own way, but it's small, has short range, isn't really for camping. It's just a day trip toy. Fun for sure and really is remarkably agile and capable in certain terrain like soft bottomless mud and going fast over bowling ball size boulders. But it also is just not a very fun place to spend a lot of time. I have tried to fix it, but can't seem to ever make a real dent in the overall interior noise levels regardless of how much dynamat and foam I add. Its not comfortable in winter. I have full cab enclosure with doors, but it's still worse than even my old CJ5 was in winter. It's also full of dust in the summer. Nothing seals up, so the dust permeates everything in summer. It doesn't do great on big stuff - big rocks, big rivers, etc. Being so close to the ground makes everything feel huge.
The FJ40 has it's own set of downsides. It's old, needs a trailer to go very far from home, probably less reliable with the old carb engine and basic ignition. Mine still has a 2F and hasn't been super reliable. Needs a re-power. And a diet.![]()