Custom fuel system makes me want to cry

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Threads
10
Messages
105
Location
Rocky Ford Co.
I am finishing up my instalation of a tuned port injected 350 SBC in my 1967 FJ40. The fuel system has left me scratching my head. At first I thought that a Chevy S-10 Blazer fuel tank was the right option. So I purchased a 91 Camaro fuel pump and grafted it into the Blazer sender. Now that I have done a dry fit of the tank and I am not satisfied with the fit. I just dont know if I can live with the sacraficed ground clearance, and in addition a tank mounted under the rear of my rig throws a wrench in my plans of a future four link rear and extended wheel base. So I have a hundred or so bucks invested in a fuel setup I dont want and I am trying to divise a way to use this submergible pump. Does any one have any experience modifying their oe tank to accept a mid 90s style GM sender and fuel pump assy. If so, were the factory baffles in the Toyota tank sufficient enough for a high pressure GM submergible pump. The TPI pump like I am using puts out in the ball park of 50 psi while the TBI pump only puts out around 12 PSI. Any ideas or advise would be appreciated.
Brad @ Rubens Body Shop
 
:bang::bang::bang::bang:
 
hey Gimmie Green the only way i have seen it done is with that baffle and pump set up that tanks sells (i listed in the last post) so i dont know if the factory set up would keep fuel to the pump in a corner etc. like i mention you may end up going two pumps one low pressure to a surge tank and high pressure from surge tank to fuel rail. that is how i did it and if you search tune port injection or tpi you will find a lot of links to sites with ideas. one picture i posted a while back had a surge tank made out of water filter housing using the high pressure pump that you have and mounting it in the engine bay. when i get home i could repost the pics and article.
 
What's wrong with a stock tank and an external pump, besides the money spent.

the external pumps push not pull so they will have to be underneath the tank . they also tend to get hot and burn up because there no submerged in fuel and subjected to the heat of the undercarriage . plus they are out there in the elements .

a in tank set-up is ideal . a external pump is generally what is done .

i would adapt it by cutting the bung out of the gm tank and welding or soldering it into a fj tank . my buddys 96 gm tank has basically no baffles just a tray at the bottom about 2" high that the pump sits in . i would think if you could get it to sit in the bottom dimple of the tank that would be about perfect .
 
Yeah Lone gunman that would be great and a h#)) of a lot easier that cuting up my oe tank. I was digging around in my shop and found a brand new Carter P61295S that would work perfect for the transfer pump. Do i run my return from my fuel rail back to the main tank or the surge tank? perhaps you could help with a few of the minor details
 
Not that I know that much about modern external pumps( self priming), they should be able to be installed some amount above the tank. Are you sure craptabulous? I do understand about the whole cooling thing. With a submerged pump if you run low or out of gas the fuel pump burns up. Been there, done that.
 
Last edited:
i cant find the link to the surge tank using the water filter housing but i included a pic of it and i found it originally by googeling fuel surge tank so you might try it. good luck!
surge tank assembled small.webp
surge tank labels.webp
SurgeTank1.webp
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom