Looks like Kong jizzed all over that poor 62.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Wonder what a set of mini boggers runs these days?This is so bad ass!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hztQMrcvZOA
This is so bad ass!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hztQMrcvZOA
This is so bad ass!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hztQMrcvZOA
Bossman,Not to get too heavy here but... Did anyone else find it odd that last week, on the 150th remembrance of this historic address, our President barely made mention of the event? And, when he did, he felt entitled to edit the text to leave out the words "under God"?
I would have thought our first black president would shout these famous ten sentences from the highest hill! Personally, I imagine that the entire last sentence sticks in his craw...
"It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this Nation under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Bossman,
Thanks for bringing this up. Not only was it conspicuous that he - the self-proclaimed reincarnate of Lincoln - left those words out of his "reinactment," but he did it in such a way as to provide himself needed political cover. He had to play to his radical base, while remaining "arguably" correct.
There are several copies of the Gettysburg address known to exist, and surprisingly, one or two (can't remember) don't have the words "under God" in them (I suppose Lincoln is the only one who knows why). That being said, the ObaMao White House responded to claims of revisionist history by saying he was reading from the "original document." Technically, he was, but eyewitness accounts claim the version given at Gettysburg by Lincoln 150 years ago included the words, "under God"........so who do YOU believe is right.
They DO NOT know their history.
I'm working from memory here but I believe I am correct in saying that there are six known copies of the address in Lincoln's own hand. Two are believed to have been written before the speach and the remaining four were written afterward. I believe I am correct in saying that both the original "rough draft" and the "Bliss" copy (the accepted text of the actual speach) each contain the text in question. I do know that one or more of the copies written after differ quite a bit from the actual text presented.
I'll do a little more reading and see what I can find.