I switch off daily driving a 2004 LS430 and a stock 2004 100 series. I prefer the Land Cruiser. Enough said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
What is the stock tire size of a LC100, if you don't mind me asking?
Is there a certain year of LC100 that I need to watch out for (like on the 4th gen 4runners the 2005+ had the VVTi which meant more HP, or on the 3rd 1999-2000 have the best features before the new/strange ABS setup)?
For the size and weight, the 100 series can handle surprisingly well at speed with the right aftermarket suspension setup. I was shocked. Even the LX470 stock, with AHC.I've had experience with a ton of Toyotas (I think I've had somewhere north of 40 at this point).
The LC100 is by no means "nimble" or what I would call "fun" on the road to drive in comparison to, say, even our 2017 Prius V or a 1998 Camry. Physics is physics and the LC100 is a big vehicle with a lot of weight to throw around. I could drive the Prius V through the twisty's much faster than our LX470 (and I do have quite a bit of auto-x experience). Asking how it handles, from a perspective of nimbleness, compared to a 4 Runner is like asking if I prefer a bicycle or heavy machinery for 1/4 mile fun - neither are the right tool for the job.
With that said, we were expecting to get a 4 Runner in the past (almost) year or so. I owned an 86 T4R a decade+ ago and it was an ok vehicle, small and "nimble" on the spectrum of truck type vehicles. As of recent, having the 100 series and then test driving 4 runners didn't feel like a step back, it felt like 10 steps back.
On our search for a T4R (because I wanted something 'simpler' to have, work on, and teach our kids some basics - all in a "cheaper" package) - we ultimately purchased a 60 series landcruiser because it fit all of those same notches and, well, was a Land Cruiser and not a T4R.
For the size and weight, the 100 series can handle surprisingly well at speed with the right aftermarket suspension setup. I was shocked. Even the LX470 stock, with AHC.
but it would still get outhandled (driver ability the same in both vehicles) by a prius or a camry, on pavement, on a windy road. Wouldn't hold a candle against something "fun" like a manual IS300 or an MR2.
No s***. Literally no one is making that comparison. But it handles better than other similarly sized large SUVs do.but it would still get outhandled (driver ability the same in both vehicles) by a prius or a camry, on pavement, on a windy road. Wouldn't hold a candle against something "fun" like a manual IS300 or an MR2.
No s***. Literally no one is making that comparison. But it handles better than other similarly sized large SUVs do.
No s***. Literally no one is making that comparison. But it handles better than other similarly sized large SUVs do.
Maybe you should learn to how to read s***, instead of state "no s***" as the OP specifically stated/asked:
"How "fun" is it to drive? I'm worried that with the extra weight and size it will not even be somewhat nimble."
So, when I say:
"The LC100 is by no means "nimble" or what I would call "fun" on the road to drive in comparison to, say, even our 2017 Prius V or a 1998 Camry. Physics is physics and the LC100 is a big vehicle with a lot of weight to throw around. "
....is a fair assessment/statement to what the OP stated/asked - and those 2 vehicles I would not consider "fun" nor "nimble" on the spectrum of fun/nimble vehicles.
Again, I have an 01 LX, for a short bit had a 00 LX, a 93 3x locked 80 series, have a 60 series, an 86 T4R, two 40 series, a manual IS300, 13 first gen MR2's, tercel, camry, multiple corollas.. to name some of the Toyotas.... have track time in many vehicles from very small/powerful to even large crossovers.
I was providing an opinion of my assessment of "fun and nimble" in regards to the 100 series.
Learn to read s***.
Maybe you should learn to how to read s***, instead of state "no s***" as the OP specifically stated/asked:
"How "fun" is it to drive? I'm worried that with the extra weight and size it will not even be somewhat nimble."
So, when I say:
"The LC100 is by no means "nimble" or what I would call "fun" on the road to drive in comparison to, say, even our 2017 Prius V or a 1998 Camry. Physics is physics and the LC100 is a big vehicle with a lot of weight to throw around. "
....is a fair assessment/statement to what the OP stated/asked - and those 2 vehicles I would not consider "fun" nor "nimble" on the spectrum of fun/nimble vehicles.
Again, I have an 01 LX, for a short bit had a 00 LX, a 93 3x locked 80 series, have a 60 series, an 86 T4R, two 40 series, a manual IS300, 13 first gen MR2's, tercel, camry, multiple corollas.. to name some of the Toyotas.... have track time in many vehicles from very small/powerful to even large crossovers.
I was providing an opinion of my assessment of "fun and nimble" in regards to the 100 series.
Learn to read s***.
Maybe you should learn to how to read s***, instead of state "no s***" as the OP specifically stated/asked:
"How "fun" is it to drive? I'm worried that with the extra weight and size it will not even be somewhat nimble."
So, when I say:
"The LC100 is by no means "nimble" or what I would call "fun" on the road to drive in comparison to, say, even our 2017 Prius V or a 1998 Camry. Physics is physics and the LC100 is a big vehicle with a lot of weight to throw around. "
....is a fair assessment/statement to what the OP stated/asked - and those 2 vehicles I would not consider "fun" nor "nimble" on the spectrum of fun/nimble vehicles.
Again, I have an 01 LX, for a short bit had a 00 LX, a 93 3x locked 80 series, have a 60 series, an 86 T4R, two 40 series, a manual IS300, 13 first gen MR2's, tercel, camry, multiple corollas.. to name some of the Toyotas.... have track time in many vehicles from very small/powerful to even large crossovers.
I was providing an opinion of my assessment of "fun and nimble" in regards to the 100 series.
Learn to read s***.
Seem a little late to the party, but Ive owned a 3rd gen 4Runner, a 4th gen V8 4Runner and a 100 LC.
The 3rd gen is good for what it is, the 3.4 is decent if you don't push it, its a bit small and cramped, doesn't really compare to the other 2 trucks at all.
The V8 4Runner is probably my favorite, I know this is the 100 forum...
It does 80mph at 2000rpm will cruise all day long, its as quiet as a 100LC and manages to get about 17-18 mpg. Not as big, but not cramped either. The seating position is a bit low, but i find the seats to be very comfortable. The 4th gen with some good springs and shocks rides as good as an LC. Kills off road with the full time 4WD and the Torsen center diff. Fitting 285s is a bit of a struggle as you need an aftermarket UCA. The 4th gen 4Runner is an extremely capable, very solid built truck. I love it. Basically a mini land cruiser as the drivetrain is pretty much the same.
100 Series great, built like a tank, I sold it and bought the 4th gen if that tells you anything. Phenomenal car in everyway but just overkill for my needs. It also got 11-12 mpg so that was a struggle as I was in college at thee time so I couldn't really afford to drive it anywhere. The aftermarket off road support is greatest here. Sometimes I miss the storage space and 3rd row seats, but really nothing else.
Edit: Maybe go drive a GX470