semlin
curmudgeon
I personally don't believe that the VC engages around corners. The reason I don't believe this is because you can remove a DS (just one) and when you hit the gas, the vehicle won't move for a few seconds. It will the slowly start to move until it builds up some speed, then will drive like normal. (Until you let off the gas, that is.)
Since all the power is going to the disconnected side, that's a lot of rotational difference that is required to engage the VC. You're talking about basically a 100% rotational difference (one side spinning, the other side not at all).
the vc is not an aussie locker and is not supposed to be able to transfer enough power to one axle to start the vehicle from a standing stop or allow it to drive normally on only one axle. the only way it might be able to do that is if the vc oil was red hot. i would think that your experiment would burn out a vc pronto.
as i understand it, the vc is designed to "limit the slip" not "stop the slip" (e.g. lock the diff). and it is a gradual engagement. in normal operation it will quickly get you 10 or 20% more power and torque to the non slipping axle but no more. enough to hopefully temporarily maintain traction where you otherwise might lose it, but without creating the stresses caused by locked axles.
ebag said:Now the rotational difference required to start engaging the VC is likely far south of 100%, otherwise folks wouldn't see the VC locked up from "normal" driving.
exactly. it's nowhere near 100%. the question is how much more slippage is allowed for before the vc engages over and above plus the normal slip from turning. it makes sense that it is not very much given toyota's warning not to use mismatched tires.
ebag said:Additionally, Toyota would not want the VC to lock while turning.
but it does not lock: it just limits the slip. and there is no way to prevent it activating more often when turning than on the straights, because the turn itself will cause some baseline wheel slippage that will count towards whatever the vc threshold engagement is. the vc has no way of distinguishing normal cornering slip from traction slip.
ebag said:Toyota introduced ABS at the same time as the VC, but they aren't tied together. It's believed that the VC was introduced primarily to help reduce the clunk and slop in the drive train, the better handling on slick surfaces was a bonus that made it worth while.
But the two systems aren't connected in any way, shape, or form.
i agree they are not physically connected but the abs system works based on monitoring the rotational speed of the wheels. there may be an abs related design reason that toyota used a vc when it introduced the abs. if the abs is calibrated to expect a vc to be helping limit wheel spin differential then it may apply more brake force than the engineers thought would be safe for that level of difference with no vc in place. remember that the abs system was introduced in 1993 which is early days for abs.
and, as i said, i do not know if it impacts on abs, i just suspect it.