Been trying to find more information on the toyota 5L engine which, I've been told, does not receive turbos well due to it's "high-compression cylinders."

That's a direct quote from a guy whose quote-worthiness I question, mainly b/c it seems like a vague statement: I mean, the cylinders themselves, the pistons, the...what exactly is the meaning there? Anybody have much experience with these engines or know someone they can question a little? I'm counting on you guys in Oz and those of you in Africa especially.
For non-tarmac performance the change is huge over the 2LTE and therefore most (nearly all) of my general usage, plus the added bonus of a completely mechanical setup for ease of upkeep. I would rate performance as vastly better than the 2LTE...more than the numbers would indicate.
The only fact that may lend credence to the statement about the "cylinders" seems to be the fact that I don't know that Toyota ever added a Turbo to it. Even more, when they designed their first 3.0 L turbo...they went to the KZ. So, whaddya all think?
Thanks all,
Jason

That's a direct quote from a guy whose quote-worthiness I question, mainly b/c it seems like a vague statement: I mean, the cylinders themselves, the pistons, the...what exactly is the meaning there? Anybody have much experience with these engines or know someone they can question a little? I'm counting on you guys in Oz and those of you in Africa especially.
For non-tarmac performance the change is huge over the 2LTE and therefore most (nearly all) of my general usage, plus the added bonus of a completely mechanical setup for ease of upkeep. I would rate performance as vastly better than the 2LTE...more than the numbers would indicate.
The only fact that may lend credence to the statement about the "cylinders" seems to be the fact that I don't know that Toyota ever added a Turbo to it. Even more, when they designed their first 3.0 L turbo...they went to the KZ. So, whaddya all think?
Thanks all,
Jason
