I am trying to find out if the 2016 cruiser has bigger front calipers and rotors like the 2016 Tundra.
The 2016 LC has the same size rotors as the 2007-2015 Tundra, according to Centric. I'm not sure if the 2016 Tundra is the same or not.
The parts number appeared to be different for both cruiser and Tundra.
Yes even the 2015 Tundra and the 2016 LC rotors are different part #'s. I don't know why since they're the same size. Maybe there's some infintessimally small difference between them?
The rear caliper for 2016 200 and Tundra both have different part number but same rotor as previous year model, so possible more powerful rear caliper as well perhaps bigger piston?
Both the front and the rear calipers are different part #'s starting in 2016, but the front pads are the same as 2015 (I haven't checked the rears).
If I can find a Toyota dealer who has both front calipers in stock in their parts dept (2015 LC and 2016 LC) I would compare them and take photos. I suspect there's a slight difference due to the increased rotor size but not a significant change since the pads are the same part number.
For 2016 cruiser owner who upgrade from pre-2016 cruiser, do you feel improvement in braking?
I'm curious about this as well. Most likely the answer is yes if for no other reason than the owner would have gone from brakes with mileage on them to a new vehicle with less (or no) mileage on them.
One thing
@bjowett noted is that the brake lines on the LC don't fit the Tundra calipers without some modification. Given the 2016 LC front rotors are larger, when I need to upgrade my 2013 brakes (I'm at 60k now on what I believe are the original pads and rotors) I will likely buy the 2016 LC parts (rotors, calipers, and splash shield) and swap them over unless someone else uses other components (e.g 2016 Tundra) successfully first and claims there's a significant difference.